Anonymous wrote:Most of the offensive plays are initiated in the midfield - not sure why you say that about the attack or any 5th or 7th grade player - who are you? Both teams have good players and attackmen.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The previous poster must have been referring to the 2024 or 2026 teams. 24 won top gun tournament and the 26 team made the finals. Every other year the teams are good. 25 and 27 struggled.
25 and 27 struggled because neither of them has an attack that’s worth a sh*t and they can’t score points.
Anonymous wrote:No, the point is you are a psychopath for calling out 12 year olds.
Most of the offensive plays are initiated in the midfield - not sure why you say that about the attack or any 5th or 7th grade player - who are you? Both teams have good players and attackmen.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The previous poster must have been referring to the 2024 or 2026 teams. 24 won top gun tournament and the 26 team made the finals. Every other year the teams are good. 25 and 27 struggled.
25 and 27 struggled because neither of them has an attack that’s worth a sh*t and they can’t score points.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The previous poster must have been referring to the 2024 or 2026 teams. 24 won top gun tournament and the 26 team made the finals. Every other year the teams are good. 25 and 27 struggled.
25 and 27 struggled because neither of them has an attack that’s worth a sh*t and they can’t score points.
Dude, you are talking about 5th and 7th graders. I don’t care who you root for or support, you sound like an absolute fool for this comment. A lot better ways to get your point across. Please don’t breed in the future.
Um, dude, the 5th and 7th graders they played against had attack that could score goals (many, many of them) so it is obviously possible for teams that age to have an attack that does not suck, you damned fool.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The previous poster must have been referring to the 2024 or 2026 teams. 24 won top gun tournament and the 26 team made the finals. Every other year the teams are good. 25 and 27 struggled.
25 and 27 struggled because neither of them has an attack that’s worth a sh*t and they can’t score points.
Dude, you are talking about 5th and 7th graders. I don’t care who you root for or support, you sound like an absolute fool for this comment. A lot better ways to get your point across. Please don’t breed in the future.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The previous poster must have been referring to the 2024 or 2026 teams. 24 won top gun tournament and the 26 team made the finals. Every other year the teams are good. 25 and 27 struggled.
25 and 27 struggled because neither of them has an attack that’s worth a sh*t and they can’t score points.
Anonymous wrote:The previous poster must have been referring to the 2024 or 2026 teams. 24 won top gun tournament and the 26 team made the finals. Every other year the teams are good. 25 and 27 struggled.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Say what you want about VLC, but their teams are heating up and making waves, especially the younger teams. I think they had a bit of a stumble in performance being one of that last upper level clubs to reach into middle school and elementary school aged kids. Now that they have been doing so for a few years the dividends are starting to show. It's nice to see that solid practices and fundamentals still can yield results and all of the kids (there may be one or two somewhere) seem to be age appropriate. Can't say the same for some of these teams that have kids driving themselves to the 2023 games.
So lame. I love the superlative "all of the kids..." statement with the sheepish "but VLC does have some too" in parentheses.
Anonymous wrote:Say what you want about VLC, but their teams are heating up and making waves, especially the younger teams. I think they had a bit of a stumble in performance being one of that last upper level clubs to reach into middle school and elementary school aged kids. Now that they have been doing so for a few years the dividends are starting to show. It's nice to see that solid practices and fundamentals still can yield results and all of the kids (there may be one or two somewhere) seem to be age appropriate. Can't say the same for some of these teams that have kids driving themselves to the 2023 games.
Anonymous wrote:Say what you want about VLC, but their teams are heating up and making waves, especially the younger teams. I think they had a bit of a stumble in performance being one of that last upper level clubs to reach into middle school and elementary school aged kids. Now that they have been doing so for a few years the dividends are starting to show. It's nice to see that solid practices and fundamentals still can yield results and all of the kids (there may be one or two somewhere) seem to be age appropriate. Can't say the same for some of these teams that have kids driving themselves to the 2023 games.
Anonymous wrote:After 42 pages of “feedback on VLC” lacrosse the summary is check linked in profiles at Tufts and UVA? That is some forward thinking. How about the club itself? How is the lacrosse?