Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why did the Wapo story even report that he kissed an 18 year old? I can understand that it would be appropriate if he slept with the 14 year old (which apparently he did not), but kissing an 18 year old? That's what makes it sounds like a hit piece to me. We all know how much the Wapo detests his brand of conservatism.

If they only reported the 14-year-old’s story, you all would have said that it’s only one claim and uncorroborated. So they found 30 sources backing up similar claims by four women and you still find a way to bitch and moan about it.

Wait, wait, corroborate what exactly? That he went on a date with an 18 year old? I didn't realize it was criminal now for 32 year olds to ask 18 year olds out on dates in Alabama.

"Gloria Thacker Deason says she was an 18-year-old cheerleader when Moore began taking her on dates that included bottles of Mateus Rosé wine. The legal drinking age in Alabama was 19. "

Stop being obtuse. If they'd only reported he'd whipped out his dick for a 14 year to rub you'd have said prove it.

And you think it's okay for a 30 something to start propositioning a 16 year old and then
start dating her and giving her alcohol when she turned 18? I hope you don't have daughters.

Obtuse really applies to the Wapo and everyone who wants to read nefarious, evil, perverted intent into a grown man wooing a grown woman.

I still say prove it with the 14 year old, which has nothing to do with whether he bought *gasp* an 18 year old alcohol.

Our society, or certain segments of it rather, are becoming rather puritanical as of late. Hard to believe normal, healthy behavior of being attracted to and trying to date a fully grown woman is suddenly a scandal. I weep for the future and our society's critical reasoning abilities.

Have you forgotten that we’re discussing someone who’s been called the Ayatollah of Alabama? Puritanical? Nah. Neanderthal

I am still failing to see the problem with a 32 year old asking an 18 year old woman out. It's as if his political opponents want this to be seen in the same light as Harvey Weinstein raping actresses in his hotel room. Society is becoming a Starr Chamber.

Fabulous movie reference. Huge points, PP! You are correct - the liberals have seen the success outing Hollywood slime and said "Look, this works...let's do this to conservatives", forgetting that the liberals like Weinstein and Spacey are actually checking themselves into sex rehab clinics, and with other liberals like Weiner, there are photos and texts.

In other words these Democrats (none of whom is running for office) have admired their guilt and are paying the price. Apparently Republicans don't have to when they do the same slimey things?

They actually admitted their guilt, but no doubt they admired it as well. The key here is ADMITTED as in, yes, they are saying they DID do it.

Apparently the key to have Republicans believe you is not to admit your guilt. Doesn't matter if a number of others corroborated the victim's account.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Stephen Colbert: Roy Moore's actions are so disgusting that voters will either remove him from the ballot or make him President.

Liberal voters did that with Clinton. Colbert must be confused.

Clinton molested a 14 year old???

Do you know for a fact that Moore did? Proof? Please provide photos, texts, etc.

Anonymous wrote:Nice to see different standards for Weinstein and Pig Moore. GOP values in action!

Anonymous wrote:The GOP spent three decades turning baseless accusations against the Clintons — Bill, Hillary and Chelsea — into fact, without “due process.” It’s an industry for the likes of Rush and Hannity. So cry me a river.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why did the Wapo story even report that he kissed an 18 year old? I can understand that it would be appropriate if he slept with the 14 year old (which apparently he did not), but kissing an 18 year old? That's what makes it sounds like a hit piece to me. We all know how much the Wapo detests his brand of conservatism.

If they only reported the 14-year-old’s story, you all would have said that it’s only one claim and uncorroborated. So they found 30 sources backing up similar claims by four women and you still find a way to bitch and moan about it.

Wait, wait, corroborate what exactly? That he went on a date with an 18 year old? I didn't realize it was criminal now for 32 year olds to ask 18 year olds out on dates in Alabama.

"Gloria Thacker Deason says she was an 18-year-old cheerleader when Moore began taking her on dates that included bottles of Mateus Rosé wine. The legal drinking age in Alabama was 19. "

Stop being obtuse. If they'd only reported he'd whipped out his dick for a 14 year to rub you'd have said prove it.

And you think it's okay for a 30 something to start propositioning a 16 year old and then
start dating her and giving her alcohol when she turned 18? I hope you don't have daughters.

Obtuse really applies to the Wapo and everyone who wants to read nefarious, evil, perverted intent into a grown man wooing a grown woman.

I still say prove it with the 14 year old, which has nothing to do with whether he bought *gasp* an 18 year old alcohol.

Our society, or certain segments of it rather, are becoming rather puritanical as of late. Hard to believe normal, healthy behavior of being attracted to and trying to date a fully grown woman is suddenly a scandal. I weep for the future and our society's critical reasoning abilities.

Have you forgotten that we’re discussing someone who’s been called the Ayatollah of Alabama? Puritanical? Nah. Neanderthal

I am still failing to see the problem with a 32 year old asking an 18 year old woman out. It's as if his political opponents want this to be seen in the same light as Harvey Weinstein raping actresses in his hotel room. Society is becoming a Starr Chamber.

Fabulous movie reference. Huge points, PP! You are correct - the liberals have seen the success outing Hollywood slime and said "Look, this works...let's do this to conservatives", forgetting that the liberals like Weinstein and Spacey are actually checking themselves into sex rehab clinics, and with other liberals like Weiner, there are photos and texts.

In other words these Democrats (none of whom is running for office) have admired their guilt and are paying the price. Apparently Republicans don't have to when they do the same slimey things?

They actually admitted their guilt, but no doubt they admired it as well. The key here is ADMITTED as in, yes, they are saying they DID do it.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So, no blanket condemnation of Moore from the right?

Underaged girls aren't off limits?

Of course they are. Ask Anthony Weiner, Ed Murray, Jacob Schwartz, Robert Menendez, and of course - Jeffrey Epstein, just to name a few Democrats involved in underage sex scandals.

So, no blanket condemnation of all these men from the left?

JFC, I condemn ALL pediphiles and predators. Don't you? Or does it depend on their political affiliation? That's pretty crazy.

Of course. But it's always useful to remind Democrats of their own politicians' sex scandals. To hear you people talk about Republicans, one would think you guys are free of scandal. Right?

No. Humans are flawed, party aside. Plenty of democratic scumbags. Democrats, imo, don't compound their sins for the most part by also being hypocrites. They dont usually run on a platform of "family values" and "moral clarity" or whatever.

What is astonishing here (and with the Trump gross tapes) is that people are defending him, slandering the victim etc. I would have thought that you would rather be represented by a democrat than a pedophile but it's not the way the good people of Alabama seem to think.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why did the Wapo story even report that he kissed an 18 year old? I can understand that it would be appropriate if he slept with the 14 year old (which apparently he did not), but kissing an 18 year old? That's what makes it sounds like a hit piece to me. We all know how much the Wapo detests his brand of conservatism.

If they only reported the 14-year-old’s story, you all would have said that it’s only one claim and uncorroborated. So they found 30 sources backing up similar claims by four women and you still find a way to bitch and moan about it.

Wait, wait, corroborate what exactly? That he went on a date with an 18 year old? I didn't realize it was criminal now for 32 year olds to ask 18 year olds out on dates in Alabama.

"Gloria Thacker Deason says she was an 18-year-old cheerleader when Moore began taking her on dates that included bottles of Mateus Rosé wine. The legal drinking age in Alabama was 19. "

Stop being obtuse. If they'd only reported he'd whipped out his dick for a 14 year to rub you'd have said prove it.

And you think it's okay for a 30 something to start propositioning a 16 year old and then
start dating her and giving her alcohol when she turned 18? I hope you don't have daughters.

Obtuse really applies to the Wapo and everyone who wants to read nefarious, evil, perverted intent into a grown man wooing a grown woman.

I still say prove it with the 14 year old, which has nothing to do with whether he bought *gasp* an 18 year old alcohol.

Our society, or certain segments of it rather, are becoming rather puritanical as of late. Hard to believe normal, healthy behavior of being attracted to and trying to date a fully grown woman is suddenly a scandal. I weep for the future and our society's critical reasoning abilities.

Have you forgotten that we’re discussing someone who’s been called the Ayatollah of Alabama? Puritanical? Nah. Neanderthal

I am still failing to see the problem with a 32 year old asking an 18 year old woman out. It's as if his political opponents want this to be seen in the same light as Harvey Weinstein raping actresses in his hotel room. Society is becoming a Starr Chamber.

Fabulous movie reference. Huge points, PP! You are correct - the liberals have seen the success outing Hollywood slime and said "Look, this works...let's do this to conservatives", forgetting that the liberals like Weinstein and Spacey are actually checking themselves into sex rehab clinics, and with other liberals like Weiner, there are photos and texts.

In other words these Democrats (none of whom is running for office) have admired their guilt and are paying the price. Apparently Republicans don't have to when they do the same slimey things?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It is dumbfounding that we are at the point where people are rationalizing a 30 year old sexually molesting/touching a 14 year old girl.

Weinsten is a pig and he has no allegations of pedophilia.
Weiner is a pig, and he was texting, no allegations of touching.

But this is an Assistant DA who was luring and touching a 14 year old girl, and yet people are defending it.

Wake up.

You have absolutely no proof that this occurred besides the word of people who were approached by a newspaper who endorsed the accused opponent.

Why would so many people lie? Why would a 71 year old Republican mother lie?

How do you know she's a republican? Because she told the press?

Why did Brawley lie? Why did the UVA chick lie?

Is every woman who accuses a man a Tanya Brawley then in your mind?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So, no blanket condemnation of Moore from the right?

Underaged girls aren't off limits?

Of course they are. Ask Anthony Weiner, Ed Murray, Jacob Schwartz, Robert Menendez, and of course - Jeffrey Epstein, just to name a few Democrats involved in underage sex scandals.

So, no blanket condemnation of all these men from the left?

JFC, I condemn ALL pediphiles and predators. Don't you? Or does it depend on their political affiliation? That's pretty crazy.

Of course. But it's always useful to remind Democrats of their own politicians' sex scandals. To hear you people talk about Republicans, one would think you guys are free of scandal. Right?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Stephen Colbert: Roy Moore's actions are so disgusting that voters will either remove him from the ballot or make him President.

Liberal voters did that with Clinton. Colbert must be confused.

Clinton molested a 14 year old???

Do you know for a fact that Moore did? Proof? Please provide photos, texts, etc.

Do you demand that of every accuser?

I believe a woman who told others at the time and her mother some years later. They've confirmed it. Why do you believe all these people are lying? Where's YOUR proof?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It is dumbfounding that we are at the point where people are rationalizing a 30 year old sexually molesting/touching a 14 year old girl.

Weinsten is a pig and he has no allegations of pedophilia.
Weiner is a pig, and he was texting, no allegations of touching.

But this is an Assistant DA who was luring and touching a 14 year old girl, and yet people are defending it.

Wake up.

You have absolutely no proof that this occurred besides the word of people who were approached by a newspaper who endorsed the accused opponent.

Why would so many people lie? Why would a 71 year old Republican mother lie?

How do you know she's a republican? Because she told the press?

Why did Brawley lie? Why did the UVA chick lie?

Is every woman who accuses a man a Tanya Brawley then in your mind?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It is dumbfounding that we are at the point where people are rationalizing a 30 year old sexually molesting/touching a 14 year old girl.

Weinsten is a pig and he has no allegations of pedophilia.
Weiner is a pig, and he was texting, no allegations of touching.

But this is an Assistant DA who was luring and touching a 14 year old girl, and yet people are defending it.

Wake up.

You have absolutely no proof that this occurred besides the word of people who were approached by a newspaper who endorsed the accused opponent.

Why would so many people lie? Why would a 71 year old Republican mother lie?

How do you know she's a republican? Because she told the press?

Why did Brawley lie? Why did the UVA chick lie?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It is dumbfounding that we are at the point where people are rationalizing a 30 year old sexually molesting/touching a 14 year old girl.

Weinsten is a pig and he has no allegations of pedophilia.
Weiner is a pig, and he was texting, no allegations of touching.

But this is an Assistant DA who was luring and touching a 14 year old girl, and yet people are defending it.

Wake up.

You have absolutely no proof that this occurred besides the word of people who were approached by a newspaper who endorsed the accused opponent.

Why would so many people lie? Why would a 71 year old Republican mother lie?

How do you know she's a republican? Because she told the press?

Why did Brawley lie? Why did the UVA chick lie?