Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:If the Russians wanted to influence the American presidential election, they did not need Donny Trump. At the time of the June 2016 meeting, they apparently already had the DNC emails and had no problems getting them in the public domain over the summer thanks to the dutiful mainstream media that will report on just about any leak.
The meeting with the Russian lawyer seems more likely designed to cultivate a relationship with the Trump family but it did not work. Jared apparently walked out of the meeting after 5-10 minutes. And Donny Trump did not follow up on the alleged evidence adverse to Hillary or her campaign. Where's the scandal?
The scandal is that Donny Jr. accepted a meeting with a foreign representative who he admits promised him dirt on his father's opponent and that's exactly why he met with her. That's against the law. Just that he accepted and met with this person.
And the other scandal is people like you, purported "Americans" (MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN) who have no problem with this behavior. You have become what you say you hate. Swamp thing.
Name the maw or regulation broken please. I want the specifics.
More to the post by, no "dirt" was exchanged.
Again, if you get caught soliciting a prostitute, it doesn't matter if you actually get your willy wet.
False equivalence. Soliciting sex is a crime, talking to someone from Russia not. Try again
Soliciting information and other in-kind exchanges from a foreign entity during a campaign - whether or not you actually receive them - is against the law. Opposition research has a monetary value - consulting firms charge hundreds of thousands and more for that work.
Doesn't matter that Donnie Jr. didn't get "good" info. He said he wanted it. He knew it was from a source tied to the Kremlin. The fact that you are defending this reflects your tribalism, not the law. Or patriotism for that matter.
Wrong..
The FEC website clearly states foreign nationals can volunteer. DJT didn't solicit information. And what law, point to the law or regulations broken, no one can.
Furthermore, the source isn't tied to the Kremlin, you have no evidence of that.
I truly hope this is sarcasm, because if it's not, it's the most unhinged claim I have seen on here in quite a while. You really think it's okay for Russian agents to influence a U.S. election if they are not on the campaign payroll? They are on the Kremlin payroll for goodness sakes.
DJT2 did solicit information. The Russian lawyer said he was begging for it.
People, have posted repeatedly on here all the laws that may have been broken. Hint: there are many. Scroll back and see for yourself, I'm not doing the work for such an uninformed and lazy argument.