Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I was thinking back to the time a college kid got busted in the Philippines for vandalism and he wound up getting his ass caned. Maybe they ought to do the same for Lochte
I think that was Singapore.
I don’t agree that caning is an appropriate punishment for this particular “crime.”
Effective because no more Americans go to Singapore and vandalize stuff.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Bentz has given his version of events. He says no one entered the bathroom. They did urinate outside the back of the building and Lochte pulled off a loosely anchored ad. So while there was some damage, they did not trash the restroom as the Brazilians described. Hope someone investigates that fantastical tale by the authorities.
But, if they never entered the bathroom, how did they damage the precious soap dispenser?!?
They didn't, the bathrooms were locked which is why they had to pee outside .
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The swimmers paid over $400 at gunpoint for a broken door and soap dispenser. Yes, sounds like they got robbed.
http://www.nbcnewyork.com/news/sports/Rio-Police-to-Question-3-US-Swimmers-on-Robbery--390539131.html
Because you know how much it cost to replace a commercial door and soap dispenser including labor--not to mention the fact that they would have done jail time in America for such a crime.
I'd say they got off easy.
I'm assuming you don't live in DC, PP. No one here is doing hard time for knocking down a door.![]()
Anonymous wrote:Hopefully they think long and hard before allowing another 3rd world country to host the games in the future.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The swimmers paid over $400 at gunpoint for a broken door and soap dispenser. Yes, sounds like they got robbed.
http://www.nbcnewyork.com/news/sports/Rio-Police-to-Question-3-US-Swimmers-on-Robbery--390539131.html
Because you know how much it cost to replace a commercial door and soap dispenser including labor--not to mention the fact that they would have done jail time in America for such a crime.
I'd say they got off easy.
I'm assuming you don't live in DC, PP. No one here is doing hard time for knocking down a door.![]()
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The swimmers paid over $400 at gunpoint for a broken door and soap dispenser. Yes, sounds like they got robbed.
http://www.nbcnewyork.com/news/sports/Rio-Police-to-Question-3-US-Swimmers-on-Robbery--390539131.html
Because you know how much it cost to replace a commercial door and soap dispenser including labor--not to mention the fact that they would have done jail time in America for such a crime.
I'd say they got off easy.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why the heck didn't they immediately explain what really happened, instead of concocting a crazy story and then sticking by it?
Eh I've been to Colombia and been subjected to a similar extortion. And no I didn't destroy any property.
Is there really a difference between being robbed and being extorted at gunpoint?
Anonymous wrote:Why the heck didn't they immediately explain what really happened, instead of concocting a crazy story and then sticking by it?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Bentz has given his version of events. He says no one entered the bathroom. They did urinate outside the back of the building and Lochte pulled off a loosely anchored ad. So while there was some damage, they did not trash the restroom as the Brazilians described. Hope someone investigates that fantastical tale by the authorities.
But, if they never entered the bathroom, how did they damage the precious soap dispenser?!?
Anonymous wrote:Bentz has given his version of events. He says no one entered the bathroom. They did urinate outside the back of the building and Lochte pulled off a loosely anchored ad. So while there was some damage, they did not trash the restroom as the Brazilians described. Hope someone investigates that fantastical tale by the authorities.