Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It is not witch hunting. The name of the family that hosted the party and the person that bought the alcohol should be published just the same as the driver's name was published.
In my opinion, these people are even more guilty.
For them to be guilty, they first have to be charged with something.
If/when they are charged with something, it will be in the news. Then your desires for punishment can begin to be satisfied.
The police and media had no problem publishing the name of the driver and saying it was alcohol related, but not who supplied the booze or where the party was at. This makes me sick.
Those adults who bought the booze and allowed this to go on their home are the reason we have teen drinking issues.
You're wrong on multiple levels. But, whatever: Off with their heads!!
Please explain yourself...? How are the kids getting the alcohol, if not from adults?
I am not the PP but...
Fresh and Soph: Steal liquor from their house, the house they baby sit/house sit/grandma/aunts/etc, etc. It does not take a lot of liquor to get drunk at this age and between 10 friends, it takes parents until Soph year to figure it out, then they lock it up or stop buying it but still they seem to be able to get it. You think that parents are buy liquor?
After that: friends that are 21 that are not parents and older siblings.
A friend that is 21 is an adult and if they provide alcohol to those under 21, it is a big problem.
Anonymous wrote:The Sherwood kid plead guilty.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/local/education/teen-driver-was-going-119-mph-in-crash-that-killed-sherwood-high-student/2015/07/17/38e8728e-2c1b-11e5-bd33-395c05608059_story.html
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It is not witch hunting. The name of the family that hosted the party and the person that bought the alcohol should be published just the same as the driver's name was published.
In my opinion, these people are even more guilty.
For them to be guilty, they first have to be charged with something.
If/when they are charged with something, it will be in the news. Then your desires for punishment can begin to be satisfied.
The police and media had no problem publishing the name of the driver and saying it was alcohol related, but not who supplied the booze or where the party was at. This makes me sick.
Those adults who bought the booze and allowed this to go on their home are the reason we have teen drinking issues.
You're wrong on multiple levels. But, whatever: Off with their heads!!
Please explain yourself...? How are the kids getting the alcohol, if not from adults?
I am not the PP but...
Fresh and Soph: Steal liquor from their house, the house they baby sit/house sit/grandma/aunts/etc, etc. It does not take a lot of liquor to get drunk at this age and between 10 friends, it takes parents until Soph year to figure it out, then they lock it up or stop buying it but still they seem to be able to get it. You think that parents are buy liquor?
After that: friends that are 21 that are not parents and older siblings.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It is not witch hunting. The name of the family that hosted the party and the person that bought the alcohol should be published just the same as the driver's name was published.
In my opinion, these people are even more guilty.
For them to be guilty, they first have to be charged with something.
If/when they are charged with something, it will be in the news. Then your desires for punishment can begin to be satisfied.
The police and media had no problem publishing the name of the driver and saying it was alcohol related, but not who supplied the booze or where the party was at. This makes me sick.
Those adults who bought the booze and allowed this to go on their home are the reason we have teen drinking issues.
You're wrong on multiple levels. But, whatever: Off with their heads!!
Please explain yourself...? How are the kids getting the alcohol, if not from adults?
I am not the PP but...
Fresh and Soph: Steal liquor from their house, the house they baby sit/house sit/grandma/aunts/etc, etc. It does not take a lot of liquor to get drunk at this age and between 10 friends, it takes parents until Soph year to figure it out, then they lock it up or stop buying it but still they seem to be able to get it. You think that parents are buy liquor?
After that: friends that are 21 that are not parents and older siblings.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It is not witch hunting. The name of the family that hosted the party and the person that bought the alcohol should be published just the same as the driver's name was published.
In my opinion, these people are even more guilty.
For them to be guilty, they first have to be charged with something.
If/when they are charged with something, it will be in the news. Then your desires for punishment can begin to be satisfied.
The police and media had no problem publishing the name of the driver and saying it was alcohol related, but not who supplied the booze or where the party was at. This makes me sick.
Those adults who bought the booze and allowed this to go on their home are the reason we have teen drinking issues.
You're wrong on multiple levels. But, whatever: Off with their heads!!
Please explain yourself...? How are the kids getting the alcohol, if not from adults?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It is not witch hunting. The name of the family that hosted the party and the person that bought the alcohol should be published just the same as the driver's name was published.
In my opinion, these people are even more guilty.
For them to be guilty, they first have to be charged with something.
If/when they are charged with something, it will be in the news. Then your desires for punishment can begin to be satisfied.
The police and media had no problem publishing the name of the driver and saying it was alcohol related, but not who supplied the booze or where the party was at. This makes me sick.
Those adults who bought the booze and allowed this to go on their home are the reason we have teen drinking issues.
You're wrong on multiple levels. But, whatever: Off with their heads!!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It is not witch hunting. The name of the family that hosted the party and the person that bought the alcohol should be published just the same as the driver's name was published.
In my opinion, these people are even more guilty.
For them to be guilty, they first have to be charged with something.
If/when they are charged with something, it will be in the news. Then your desires for punishment can begin to be satisfied.
The police and media had no problem publishing the name of the driver and saying it was alcohol related, but not who supplied the booze or where the party was at. This makes me sick.
Those adults who bought the booze and allowed this to go on their home are the reason we have teen drinking issues.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What surprise evidence might still be lurking in the woods, at this point? Yes, let's be wildly imaginative.
I don't know exactly what they are looking for, but the road was blocked off late this morning and police were clearly analyzing the scene.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It is not witch hunting. The name of the family that hosted the party and the person that bought the alcohol should be published just the same as the driver's name was published.
In my opinion, these people are even more guilty.
For them to be guilty, they first have to be charged with something.
If/when they are charged with something, it will be in the news. Then your desires for punishment can begin to be satisfied.
The police and media had no problem publishing the name of the driver and saying it was alcohol related, but not who supplied the booze or where the party was at. This makes me sick.
Those adults who bought the booze and allowed this to go on their home are the reason we have teen drinking issues.
Absolutely agree!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It is not witch hunting. The name of the family that hosted the party and the person that bought the alcohol should be published just the same as the driver's name was published.
In my opinion, these people are even more guilty.
For them to be guilty, they first have to be charged with something.
If/when they are charged with something, it will be in the news. Then your desires for punishment can begin to be satisfied.
The police and media had no problem publishing the name of the driver and saying it was alcohol related, but not who supplied the booze or where the party was at. This makes me sick.
Those adults who bought the booze and allowed this to go on their home are the reason we have teen drinking issues.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It is not witch hunting. The name of the family that hosted the party and the person that bought the alcohol should be published just the same as the driver's name was published.
In my opinion, these people are even more guilty.
For them to be guilty, they first have to be charged with something.
If/when they are charged with something, it will be in the news. Then your desires for punishment can begin to be satisfied.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What surprise evidence might still be lurking in the woods, at this point? Yes, let's be wildly imaginative.
I don't know exactly what they are looking for, but the road was blocked off late this morning and police were clearly analyzing the scene.