Anonymous wrote:Wow. Did any of you actually watch the cold case documentary? The parents and Burke did not do this. The case is bizarre but it’s not the parents. I feel like it’s eye opening in the same way as the Menendez case is now. Earlier opinions tainted by smearing and leaks intended to paint these folks as killers. Watch it and then follow up. John wasn’t paid for it, didn’t ask for edit of it and was very cooperative.
The experts didn’t all conclude it was family! Actually the best FBI profilers and most experienced investigators like Lou Smit and John Douglas concluded it’s an intruder. Hopefully more sophisticated DNA tests will be taken and some previously investigated suspects could be tied in with that to find out who did this.
Anonymous wrote:Has anyone listened to this podcast?
https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/a-normal-family-the-jonbenet-ramsey-case-revisited/id1595257813
I was firmly in the “Burke did it” camp until I listened to this. They convinced me that Patsy did it.
Anonymous wrote:Has anyone listened to this podcast?
https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/a-normal-family-the-jonbenet-ramsey-case-revisited/id1595257813
I was firmly in the “Burke did it” camp until I listened to this. They convinced me that Patsy did it.
Anonymous wrote:As in any case, I trust the grand jury most of all. And they wanted to charge the parents.
Anonymous wrote:As in any case, I trust the grand jury most of all. And they wanted to charge the parents.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The garrote is what bothers me. How would Burke or Patsy know how to make that?
Another big one. John did, and the knots.
So John did this and Patsy found out, thought “great idea! can I play?” And wrote a fake ransom note instead of just calling the cops on her monster husband who just killed her beloved daughter. Another dud of a theory.
The only thing that makes sense is covering up for Burke.
And even that theory has a ton of holes in it.
I don’t think anyone disagrees. But it is also quite clear that most experts that reviewed all of the evidence in the case that we have thus far concluded it was patsy that STAGED much of the scene.
This is why:
No prints on the pineapple bowl other than hers and Burkes
No prints on the note the note pad the pen other than hers
Wearing the same outfit as the night before, looked like she had been up all night
Fibers from her jacket on every item used for the staging including gloves
Loose duct tape on mouth applied after death same with ties
The wiping of the body
The opening of a present of underwear and the placing of new clean underwear from that package that were much too large for JB on JB
Many of the phrases in the ransom note and the overall tone
You don’t stage a bludgeoning and strangulation. That is what happened. Staging is like taking a body where someone drowned and put a gun in their hand to make it look like they shot themselves.
Yeah, so, nobody said that. What was staged appears to be: the underwear and the wiping down, the duct tape applied after death, the loose hand ties, the note that served no purpose given the fact that the girl was dead.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The garrote is what bothers me. How would Burke or Patsy know how to make that?
Another big one. John did, and the knots.
So John did this and Patsy found out, thought “great idea! can I play?” And wrote a fake ransom note instead of just calling the cops on her monster husband who just killed her beloved daughter. Another dud of a theory.
The only thing that makes sense is covering up for Burke.
And even that theory has a ton of holes in it.
I don’t think anyone disagrees. But it is also quite clear that most experts that reviewed all of the evidence in the case that we have thus far concluded it was patsy that STAGED much of the scene.
This is why:
No prints on the pineapple bowl other than hers and Burkes
No prints on the note the note pad the pen other than hers
Wearing the same outfit as the night before, looked like she had been up all night
Fibers from her jacket on every item used for the staging including gloves
Loose duct tape on mouth applied after death same with ties
The wiping of the body
The opening of a present of underwear and the placing of new clean underwear from that package that were much too large for JB on JB
Many of the phrases in the ransom note and the overall tone
You don’t stage a bludgeoning and strangulation. That is what happened. Staging is like taking a body where someone drowned and put a gun in their hand to make it look like they shot themselves.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The garrote is what bothers me. How would Burke or Patsy know how to make that?
Another big one. John did, and the knots.
So John did this and Patsy found out, thought “great idea! can I play?” And wrote a fake ransom note instead of just calling the cops on her monster husband who just killed her beloved daughter. Another dud of a theory.
The only thing that makes sense is covering up for Burke.
And even that theory has a ton of holes in it.
I don’t think anyone disagrees. But it is also quite clear that most experts that reviewed all of the evidence in the case that we have thus far concluded it was patsy that STAGED much of the scene.
This is why:
No prints on the pineapple bowl other than hers and Burkes
No prints on the note the note pad the pen other than hers
Wearing the same outfit as the night before, looked like she had been up all night
Fibers from her jacket on every item used for the staging including gloves
Loose duct tape on mouth applied after death same with ties
The wiping of the body
The opening of a present of underwear and the placing of new clean underwear from that package that were much too large for JB on JB
Many of the phrases in the ransom note and the overall tone
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The garrote is what bothers me. How would Burke or Patsy know how to make that?
Another big one. John did, and the knots.
So John did this and Patsy found out, thought “great idea! can I play?” And wrote a fake ransom note instead of just calling the cops on her monster husband who just killed her beloved daughter. Another dud of a theory.
The only thing that makes sense is covering up for Burke.
And even that theory has a ton of holes in it.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The garrote is what bothers me. How would Burke or Patsy know how to make that?
Another big one. John did, and the knots.
So John did this and Patsy found out, thought “great idea! can I play?” And wrote a fake ransom note instead of just calling the cops on her monster husband who just killed her beloved daughter. Another dud of a theory.
The only thing that makes sense is covering up for Burke.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The garrote is what bothers me. How would Burke or Patsy know how to make that?
Another big one. John did, and the knots.
So John did this and Patsy found out, thought “great idea! can I play?” And wrote a fake ransom note instead of just calling the cops on her monster husband who just killed her beloved daughter. Another dud of a theory.