Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anyone know did Kamala agree to this yet?

He’s doing his usual nonsense. Harris has said she’ll consider more after he shows up for the first debate.

He already showed up for the first debate.

He posted lies about the fox debate. That one is trump debating himself. It has nothing to do with Harris

Trump showed up to the Biden debate that you said he wouldn’t show up to- the result was Biden being exposed, the DNC being exposed, etc.

I guess dem strategy is to say Trump isn’t going to show up? Meanwhile Trump has proposed three debates that Kamala won’t commit to doing.

Donald can propose whatever he wants. Doesn’t mean Harris has to agree to it. Same as if she declared a debate unilaterally and expected him to show up for it. Harris has said she’ll consider other debates after he shows up for the first one.

She’s scared to debate.

We’ll see. 😁

We’ve already seen. Harris has refused to show up at a debate Trump proposed and won’t comment on or commit to the other debates Trump has proposed. What’s stopping her? She’s so fearless and tough but ducking even addressing debates?

Why would she show up? Ignore the bully. That is the best way to deal with trump.

A fearless and tough former prosecutor who has stated repeatedly she is well equipped to deal with her opponent would do more than talk about it. She’d actually walk the talk.

She is but why bother giving that weirdo a platform to tell more of his lies.

Because the American people deserve to hear directly from presidential candidates in the historically accepted debate format. It’s not about what the candidates want, it’s their obligation to the American voter in the election process.

Historically accepted? Obligation to voters? Trump blew up electoral norms years ago. He will look like a moron if he talks about historically accepted formats and obligations to voters.

Trump showed up to the previously scheduled Biden debate and has proposed more debates with Harris. She is the candidate who has decided to not engage with her opponent and schedule more debates in front of American voters. She will not allow her campaign to schedule any further debates. She hasn’t given any interviews either. That’s got nothing to do with Trump.

He seems to have unilaterally arranged a debate on Fox and tries to act as if she is obligated to show up. She is not an idiot and is not interested in his bull crap and neither are her supporters.

Have trump debate the empty chair on fox if you think that will be great for him.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anyone know did Kamala agree to this yet?

Of course she hasn't. She is a coward.
Trump has said he will show up for all of them even if she doesn't.
Hope they have an empty chair at the debates she chickens out of.

She has no obligation to let Trump dictate terms. She’s the Vice President. He’s a weird whiny loser. He’ll show up to the debate that she told him to on September 10.

No, that was a debate scheduled and agreed upon by the Biden campaign before Joe dropped out. Harris hasn’t done a single thing to schedule any other debates, despite Trump proposing many more debates.

Again, he doesn’t know when to let go. He has backed down once already and looks pathetic, don’t you think?

Again, Trump proposing debate dates, venues, rules, and Harris and her campaign refusing to respond is not Trump backing down. It’s the Harris campaign refusing to engage and negotiate additional debates.

Trump is groveling. He looks like a child asking his mother for a cookie and she keeps telling him “no Donnie” it’s almost bedtime.

Trump’s campaign is giving the Harris campaign opportunities to schedule debates and the Harris campaign is stalling at the very least, refusing outright at the very worst.

Proposing debates is not groveling. Refusing to engage and schedule debates looks very weak on the part of the Harris campaign.

We need to agree to disagree. Harris looks weak if she involves herself in his cons and nonsense. She is doing great and should keep doing what she is doing. Don't respond to his con games.

Harris will look weak if she refuses to only debate her opponent one time. Presidential debates are not “con games.”

Anonymous wrote:

Trump is groveling. He looks like a child asking his mother for a cookie and she keeps telling him “no Donnie” it’s almost bedtime.

Donnie's mother never told him no to anything.

Apparently this is what we will get instead of debates.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anyone know did Kamala agree to this yet?

Of course she hasn't. She is a coward.
Trump has said he will show up for all of them even if she doesn't.
Hope they have an empty chair at the debates she chickens out of.

She has no obligation to let Trump dictate terms. She’s the Vice President. He’s a weird whiny loser. He’ll show up to the debate that she told him to on September 10.

No, that was a debate scheduled and agreed upon by the Biden campaign before Joe dropped out. Harris hasn’t done a single thing to schedule any other debates, despite Trump proposing many more debates.

Again, he doesn’t know when to let go. He has backed down once already and looks pathetic, don’t you think?

Again, Trump proposing debate dates, venues, rules, and Harris and her campaign refusing to respond is not Trump backing down. It’s the Harris campaign refusing to engage and negotiate additional debates.

Trump is groveling. He looks like a child asking his mother for a cookie and she keeps telling him “no Donnie” it’s almost bedtime.

Trump’s campaign is giving the Harris campaign opportunities to schedule debates and the Harris campaign is stalling at the very least, refusing outright at the very worst.

Proposing debates is not groveling. Refusing to engage and schedule debates looks very weak on the part of the Harris campaign.

We need to agree to disagree. Harris looks weak if she involves herself in his cons and nonsense. She is doing great and should keep doing what she is doing. Don't respond to his con games.

Has a debate been scheduled between Vance and Walz? Walz said that he wants to debate. Maybe that one comes first?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anyone know did Kamala agree to this yet?

He’s doing his usual nonsense. Harris has said she’ll consider more after he shows up for the first debate.

He already showed up for the first debate.

He posted lies about the fox debate. That one is trump debating himself. It has nothing to do with Harris

Trump showed up to the Biden debate that you said he wouldn’t show up to- the result was Biden being exposed, the DNC being exposed, etc.

I guess dem strategy is to say Trump isn’t going to show up? Meanwhile Trump has proposed three debates that Kamala won’t commit to doing.

Donald can propose whatever he wants. Doesn’t mean Harris has to agree to it. Same as if she declared a debate unilaterally and expected him to show up for it. Harris has said she’ll consider other debates after he shows up for the first one.

She’s scared to debate.

We’ll see. 😁

We’ve already seen. Harris has refused to show up at a debate Trump proposed and won’t comment on or commit to the other debates Trump has proposed. What’s stopping her? She’s so fearless and tough but ducking even addressing debates?

Why would she show up? Ignore the bully. That is the best way to deal with trump.

A fearless and tough former prosecutor who has stated repeatedly she is well equipped to deal with her opponent would do more than talk about it. She’d actually walk the talk.

She is but why bother giving that weirdo a platform to tell more of his lies.

Because the American people deserve to hear directly from presidential candidates in the historically accepted debate format. It’s not about what the candidates want, it’s their obligation to the American voter in the election process.

Historically accepted? Obligation to voters? Trump blew up electoral norms years ago. He will look like a moron if he talks about historically accepted formats and obligations to voters.

Trump showed up to the previously scheduled Biden debate and has proposed more debates with Harris. She is the candidate who has decided to not engage with her opponent and schedule more debates in front of American voters. She will not allow her campaign to schedule any further debates. She hasn’t given any interviews either. That’s got nothing to do with Trump.

Trump is groveling. He looks like a child asking his mother for a cookie and she keeps telling him “no Donnie” it’s almost bedtime.

Donnie's mother never told him no to anything.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anyone know did Kamala agree to this yet?

Of course she hasn't. She is a coward.
Trump has said he will show up for all of them even if she doesn't.
Hope they have an empty chair at the debates she chickens out of.

She has no obligation to let Trump dictate terms. She’s the Vice President. He’s a weird whiny loser. He’ll show up to the debate that she told him to on September 10.

No, that was a debate scheduled and agreed upon by the Biden campaign before Joe dropped out. Harris hasn’t done a single thing to schedule any other debates, despite Trump proposing many more debates.

Again, he doesn’t know when to let go. He has backed down once already and looks pathetic, don’t you think?

Again, Trump proposing debate dates, venues, rules, and Harris and her campaign refusing to respond is not Trump backing down. It’s the Harris campaign refusing to engage and negotiate additional debates.

Trump is groveling. He looks like a child asking his mother for a cookie and she keeps telling him “no Donnie” it’s almost bedtime.

Trump’s campaign is giving the Harris campaign opportunities to schedule debates and the Harris campaign is stalling at the very least, refusing outright at the very worst.

Proposing debates is not groveling. Refusing to engage and schedule debates looks very weak on the part of the Harris campaign.

The only way a viable debate will happen is if a third party (NPR/League of Women Voters) comes up with a plan. They either agree to that plan or not. They don't get FOX or ABC. No privately owned media.

Back in the day the League of Women Voters ran the debates. The debates will not be accepted if they are not run by a third party.

In our area there is a list of questions that are given to each candidate and the candidate writes the answers and they are published. Can we start there? If people need more information, maybe we move to the debate run by a mutually acceptable (to the American people) organization.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anyone know did Kamala agree to this yet?

He’s doing his usual nonsense. Harris has said she’ll consider more after he shows up for the first debate.

He already showed up for the first debate.

He posted lies about the fox debate. That one is trump debating himself. It has nothing to do with Harris

Trump showed up to the Biden debate that you said he wouldn’t show up to- the result was Biden being exposed, the DNC being exposed, etc.

I guess dem strategy is to say Trump isn’t going to show up? Meanwhile Trump has proposed three debates that Kamala won’t commit to doing.

Donald can propose whatever he wants. Doesn’t mean Harris has to agree to it. Same as if she declared a debate unilaterally and expected him to show up for it. Harris has said she’ll consider other debates after he shows up for the first one.

She’s scared to debate.

We’ll see. 😁

We’ve already seen. Harris has refused to show up at a debate Trump proposed and won’t comment on or commit to the other debates Trump has proposed. What’s stopping her? She’s so fearless and tough but ducking even addressing debates?

Why would she show up? Ignore the bully. That is the best way to deal with trump.

A fearless and tough former prosecutor who has stated repeatedly she is well equipped to deal with her opponent would do more than talk about it. She’d actually walk the talk.

She is but why bother giving that weirdo a platform to tell more of his lies.

Because the American people deserve to hear directly from presidential candidates in the historically accepted debate format. It’s not about what the candidates want, it’s their obligation to the American voter in the election process.

Historically accepted? Obligation to voters? Trump blew up electoral norms years ago. He will look like a moron if he talks about historically accepted formats and obligations to voters.

The only way a viable debate will happen is if a third party (NPR/League of Women Voters) comes up with a plan. They either agree to that plan or not. They don't get FOX or ABC. No privately owned media.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anyone know did Kamala agree to this yet?

Of course she hasn't. She is a coward.
Trump has said he will show up for all of them even if she doesn't.
Hope they have an empty chair at the debates she chickens out of.

She has no obligation to let Trump dictate terms. She’s the Vice President. He’s a weird whiny loser. He’ll show up to the debate that she told him to on September 10.

No, that was a debate scheduled and agreed upon by the Biden campaign before Joe dropped out. Harris hasn’t done a single thing to schedule any other debates, despite Trump proposing many more debates.

Again, he doesn’t know when to let go. He has backed down once already and looks pathetic, don’t you think?

Again, Trump proposing debate dates, venues, rules, and Harris and her campaign refusing to respond is not Trump backing down. It’s the Harris campaign refusing to engage and negotiate additional debates.

Trump is groveling. He looks like a child asking his mother for a cookie and she keeps telling him “no Donnie” it’s almost bedtime.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anyone know did Kamala agree to this yet?

He’s doing his usual nonsense. Harris has said she’ll consider more after he shows up for the first debate.

He already showed up for the first debate.

He posted lies about the fox debate. That one is trump debating himself. It has nothing to do with Harris

Trump showed up to the Biden debate that you said he wouldn’t show up to- the result was Biden being exposed, the DNC being exposed, etc.

I guess dem strategy is to say Trump isn’t going to show up? Meanwhile Trump has proposed three debates that Kamala won’t commit to doing.

Donald can propose whatever he wants. Doesn’t mean Harris has to agree to it. Same as if she declared a debate unilaterally and expected him to show up for it. Harris has said she’ll consider other debates after he shows up for the first one.

She’s scared to debate.

We’ll see. 😁

We’ve already seen. Harris has refused to show up at a debate Trump proposed and won’t comment on or commit to the other debates Trump has proposed. What’s stopping her? She’s so fearless and tough but ducking even addressing debates?

Why would she show up? Ignore the bully. That is the best way to deal with trump.

A fearless and tough former prosecutor who has stated repeatedly she is well equipped to deal with her opponent would do more than talk about it. She’d actually walk the talk.

She is but why bother giving that weirdo a platform to tell more of his lies.

Because the American people deserve to hear directly from presidential candidates in the historically accepted debate format. It’s not about what the candidates want, it’s their obligation to the American voter in the election process.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anyone know did Kamala agree to this yet?

Of course she hasn't. She is a coward.
Trump has said he will show up for all of them even if she doesn't.
Hope they have an empty chair at the debates she chickens out of.

She has no obligation to let Trump dictate terms. She’s the Vice President. He’s a weird whiny loser. He’ll show up to the debate that she told him to on September 10.

Neither campaign has an obligation to dictate rules, the campaigns work together to find debate venues, dates, and rules acceptable to both candidates.

So far the Harris campaign has refused to do any of that work. They simply don’t have any interest in scheduling debates is the only logical explanation.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anyone know did Kamala agree to this yet?

Of course she hasn't. She is a coward.
Trump has said he will show up for all of them even if she doesn't.
Hope they have an empty chair at the debates she chickens out of.

She has no obligation to let Trump dictate terms. She’s the Vice President. He’s a weird whiny loser. He’ll show up to the debate that she told him to on September 10.

No, that was a debate scheduled and agreed upon by the Biden campaign before Joe dropped out. Harris hasn’t done a single thing to schedule any other debates, despite Trump proposing many more debates.

Again, he doesn’t know when to let go. He has backed down once already and looks pathetic, don’t you think?

Again, Trump proposing debate dates, venues, rules, and Harris and her campaign refusing to respond is not Trump backing down. It’s the Harris campaign refusing to engage and negotiate additional debates.