Anonymous wrote:Taking your husband's name in marriage offers a harmonious blend of tradition, practicality, and symbolism, outweighing the potential drawbacks for many couples. This choice, as exemplified by influential women like Hillary Clinton and Melinda Gates, demonstrates that adopting your husband's surname doesn't hinder professional growth or personal identity; rather, it can complement and enrich them.
One of the standout advantages is the ease it brings to international travel, particularly in customs and immigration processes. Families sharing the same surname often experience smoother and quicker procedures, a significant benefit in today's globalized world. This commonality in the family name simplifies the identification process, especially useful when traveling with children.
In daily life, having the same surname as your spouse and children can streamline administrative tasks related to schooling, medical care, and legal matters. It removes the need for additional documentation to prove family relationships, making these often routine yet crucial tasks more straightforward.
Beyond practicalities, adopting your husband's surname symbolizes the unity and commitment within a marriage. It fosters a strong sense of family identity and belonging, reinforcing the familial bonds. This symbolic gesture is a powerful expression of the new life and journey you embark on together as a family.
In essence, the benefits of taking your husband's name — from smoother travel experiences and simplified daily logistics to the symbolic representation of family unity — significantly outweigh the cons. It's a choice that seamlessly blends tradition with modernity, allowing women to maintain their professional and personal identities while celebrating their marital bond and family unity.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Rather than asking why women change their names I decided to ask myself why should I change mine. I didn't find a reason that would justify going though all that annoying paperwork.
I changed it because I didn't want to have a last name different from my children. It was worth it even if the paperwork was a PITA.
Why didn’t you give them yours?
It's easier giving them the father's. I don't think my husband would've been to happy with it and hyphenated names are a pain when it comes to paperwork.
So you kowtow to him because he's a man? Oh heaven forbid fred doesnt get met with a martini and his dinner right at 6!!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I changed my name because I wanted us to be a family and not someone who's git the foot out of the door. Yes, my husband wouldn't have changed his, but we're not the same and we show love in different ways. Women who keep their nane because "men do too" simply don't get that.
Sounds like your husband isnt as committed to your family if he wasnt willing to give up something as dumb as a name. Guess he must already have one foot out the door. Poor you.
He is, but as I said, men and women show commitment differently. He provides for the family which is a big responsibility.
Ugh what an awful life for him, just a cog in that capitalist machine. Too bad you literally couldn't survive without him doing so. Why are you such a hypocrite?
This is the dumbest statement I’ve read in awhile. You clearly don’t know what the words “literally” or “survive” mean.
Yes dear, the very survival of this woman (and I suppose the entire human race) is literally dependent upon middle managers and powerpoint presentations. LOL
LOLOLOLOL where the f do you think the pay check comes from? How does he keep the lights on and food on the table? Oh right, those f-ing powerpoint presentations. GMAFB.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Rather than asking why women change their names I decided to ask myself why should I change mine. I didn't find a reason that would justify going though all that annoying paperwork.
I changed it because I didn't want to have a last name different from my children. It was worth it even if the paperwork was a PITA.
Why didn’t you give them yours?
It's easier giving them the father's. I don't think my husband would've been to happy with it and hyphenated names are a pain when it comes to paperwork.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I changed my name because I wanted us to be a family and not someone who's git the foot out of the door. Yes, my husband wouldn't have changed his, but we're not the same and we show love in different ways. Women who keep their nane because "men do too" simply don't get that.
Sounds like your husband isnt as committed to your family if he wasnt willing to give up something as dumb as a name. Guess he must already have one foot out the door. Poor you.
He is, but as I said, men and women show commitment differently. He provides for the family which is a big responsibility.
Ugh what an awful life for him, just a cog in that capitalist machine. Too bad you literally couldn't survive without him doing so. Why are you such a hypocrite?
This is the dumbest statement I’ve read in awhile. You clearly don’t know what the words “literally” or “survive” mean.
Yes dear, the very survival of this woman (and I suppose the entire human race) is literally dependent upon middle managers and powerpoint presentations. LOL
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:As the title says: I'm getting married in a few days in it hasn't crossed my mind to keep my surname. We're going to start a family and I'd love all of us to have the same surname, as we're playing for the same team. My soon to be husband is ecstatic as well that I'm taking his surname. I was aware that women with fancy careers or with research published under their names kept their surnames at higher rates as they had build a name under their maiden surname. However, I started noticing a similar trend among women with less public careers and even homemakers who I know for a fact are married. I can't imagine having a different surname than my children, but it looks like some women see nothing wrong with this. Is there a reason for this? Doesn't it cause problems the road? Just asking out of curiosity.
The horror. Women should be required to present a list of their professional accomplishments before they're allowed to keep their name.
Anonymous wrote:As the title says: I'm getting married in a few days in it hasn't crossed my mind to keep my surname. We're going to start a family and I'd love all of us to have the same surname, as we're playing for the same team. My soon to be husband is ecstatic as well that I'm taking his surname. I was aware that women with fancy careers or with research published under their names kept their surnames at higher rates as they had build a name under their maiden surname. However, I started noticing a similar trend among women with less public careers and even homemakers who I know for a fact are married. I can't imagine having a different surname than my children, but it looks like some women see nothing wrong with this. Is there a reason for this? Doesn't it cause problems the road? Just asking out of curiosity.
Anonymous wrote:There are many understandable reasons for a woman to keep her maiden name after marriage. However, I’m not sure it’s “fighting the patriarchy” to choose your dad’s surname over your husband’s surname. They are both men.
Anonymous wrote:There are many understandable reasons for a woman to keep her maiden name after marriage. However, I’m not sure it’s “fighting the patriarchy” to choose your dad’s surname over your husband’s surname. They are both men.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Rather than asking why women change their names I decided to ask myself why should I change mine. I didn't find a reason that would justify going though all that annoying paperwork.
I changed it because I didn't want to have a last name different from my children. It was worth it even if the paperwork was a PITA.
Why didn’t you give them yours?
It's easier giving them the father's. I don't think my husband would've been to happy with it and hyphenated names are a pain when it comes to paperwork.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Rather than asking why women change their names I decided to ask myself why should I change mine. I didn't find a reason that would justify going though all that annoying paperwork.
I changed it because I didn't want to have a last name different from my children. It was worth it even if the paperwork was a PITA.
Why didn’t you give them yours?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Rather than asking why women change their names I decided to ask myself why should I change mine. I didn't find a reason that would justify going though all that annoying paperwork.
I changed it because I didn't want to have a last name different from my children. It was worth it even if the paperwork was a PITA.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I changed my name because I wanted us to be a family and not someone who's git the foot out of the door. Yes, my husband wouldn't have changed his, but we're not the same and we show love in different ways. Women who keep their nane because "men do too" simply don't get that.
Sounds like your husband isnt as committed to your family if he wasnt willing to give up something as dumb as a name. Guess he must already have one foot out the door. Poor you.
He is, but as I said, men and women show commitment differently. He provides for the family which is a big responsibility.
Ugh what an awful life for him, just a cog in that capitalist machine. Too bad you literally couldn't survive without him doing so. Why are you such a hypocrite?
This is the dumbest statement I’ve read in awhile. You clearly don’t know what the words “literally” or “survive” mean.
Yes dear, the very survival of this woman (and I suppose the entire human race) is literally dependent upon middle managers and powerpoint presentations. LOL