Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Aren’t alternate electors legal?
Fake ones aren't.
Anonymous wrote:Aren’t alternate electors legal?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Andy McCarthy, who likely thinks Trump is guilty, says RICO charge is invalid. because there is no criminal enterprise.
That’s stupid.
What is the enterprise?
It is a criminal conspiracy to commit numerous coordinated fraudulent acts for the purpose of illegally overturning the election of the presidential electors in Georgia and pressuring state officials to appoint their unelected fraudulent electors in place of the elected electors. That’s a criminal enterprise. Do you think they have to incorporate as an LLC to qualify as an enterprise?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Andy McCarthy, who likely thinks Trump is guilty, says RICO charge is invalid. because there is no criminal enterprise.
That’s stupid.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Andy McCarthy, who likely thinks Trump is guilty, says RICO charge is invalid. because there is no criminal enterprise.
That’s stupid.
What is the enterprise?
It is a criminal conspiracy to commit numerous coordinated fraudulent acts for the purpose of illegally overturning the election of the presidential electors in Georgia and pressuring state officials to appoint their unelected fraudulent electors in place of the elected electors. That’s a criminal enterprise. Do you think they have to incorporate as an LLC to qualify as an enterprise?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Andy McCarthy, who likely thinks Trump is guilty, says RICO charge is invalid. because there is no criminal enterprise.
That’s stupid.
What is the enterprise?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Andy McCarthy, who likely thinks Trump is guilty, says RICO charge is invalid. because there is no criminal enterprise.
That’s stupid.
Anonymous wrote:Andy McCarthy, who likely thinks Trump is guilty, says RICO charge is invalid. because there is no criminal enterprise.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
What dumb move? This isn't a political trial. It's a criminal trial. They take as long as they take.
Except it won’t ever happen if he gets elected again.
That is uncharted waters. No one really seems to know the answer to whether a sitting president can be tried in state court for crimes committed prior to becoming the president.
This is America. If it isn’t prohibited, it is allowed. It isn’t prohibited.
Spiro Agnew was Vice President and convicted of tax evasion while in office. He has the same constitutional standing as the President. The whole notion that you "can't" prosecute a sitting president is bs.
There is a DOJ opinion but it is hardly persuasive. Read it yourself. https://www.justice.gov/olc/opinion/sitting-president%E2%80%99s-amenability-indictment-and-criminal-prosecution.
NOt same standing. VP isn't even in the same branch of government.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
What dumb move? This isn't a political trial. It's a criminal trial. They take as long as they take.
Except it won’t ever happen if he gets elected again.
That is uncharted waters. No one really seems to know the answer to whether a sitting president can be tried in state court for crimes committed prior to becoming the president.
This is America. If it isn’t prohibited, it is allowed. It isn’t prohibited.
Spiro Agnew was Vice President and convicted of tax evasion while in office. He has the same constitutional standing as the President. The whole notion that you "can't" prosecute a sitting president is bs.
There is a DOJ opinion but it is hardly persuasive. Read it yourself. https://www.justice.gov/olc/opinion/sitting-president%E2%80%99s-amenability-indictment-and-criminal-prosecution.
What makes anyone think Trump would submit to any court if he got power again? He’s going to be a petty dictator if he gets back in office.
Anonymous wrote:Seth Abramson has taken a crack at the list of unindicted conspirators:
#1: TOM FITTON
#2: GA “elector”
#3: BORIS EPSHTEYN
#4: ROBERT SINNERS
#5: DAN SCAVINO *or* MOLLY MICHAEL
#6: PHIL WALDRON
#7: ?
#8: BURT JONES
#9–19: GA “electors”
#20: MICHAEL FLYNN *or* PATRICK BYRNE
#21/#22: TODD SANDERS
#21/#22: CONAN HAYES
#23: Called by HARRISON FLOYD, 1/3/21
#24–29: Coffee County plotters
#30: Powell-linked lawyer
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
What dumb move? This isn't a political trial. It's a criminal trial. They take as long as they take.
Except it won’t ever happen if he gets elected again.
That is uncharted waters. No one really seems to know the answer to whether a sitting president can be tried in state court for crimes committed prior to becoming the president.
This is America. If it isn’t prohibited, it is allowed. It isn’t prohibited.
Spiro Agnew was Vice President and convicted of tax evasion while in office. He has the same constitutional standing as the President. The whole notion that you "can't" prosecute a sitting president is bs.
There is a DOJ opinion but it is hardly persuasive. Read it yourself. https://www.justice.gov/olc/opinion/sitting-president%E2%80%99s-amenability-indictment-and-criminal-prosecution.