Guardianship is different as there is so much history of guardians taking advantage. She is a parent who is going through a divorce with a control freak so completely different but thank you

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Are the courts allowed to hold her accountable so she only spends the money on the children? The prenup should have ensured that nothing went to this awful woman, she needs to get a job.

No. Do you know how many judges, court officers, and admin people we would need in this country to verify how child support is spent?

They should make people accountable over a certain amount per child. When I was a legal guardian to an adult I had to account for every penny spent and show receipts and file paperwork yearly or my guardianship would have been terminated. Luckily I wasn't dealing with much money so it wasn't a big deal.

What was her career before they married? Did she ever have a career?

Anonymous wrote:What did her handbag designing career entail? I've never seen any of them, just read this repeatedly about her, with no details. Did she work for someone else or have her own line?

I suspect this career was greatly exaggerated as much Hollywood PR is and then the statement gets repeated over and over.

Anyone know?

Here's an article from 2005...
https://www.denverpost.com/2005/10/18/cat-bags-laptop-cases-replace-geek-with-chic/

Interesting! Thank you. I found one article that said she designed a laptop bag in 2005, Kevin encouraged her and it was for sale in Aspen, where she was described as a resident. Sounds like a sometime hobby.

PP 18:50 and here’s what I found about her handbags:

She is the owner of the handbag line 'Cat Bag Couture', which is a collection of carefully designed highly functional carrier bags that are also very fashionable. In 2005, some of her daytime purses were featured on the opening episode of 'Desperate Housewives' and were carried by leading actresses. Her products are available online, as well as in specialty stores like Hidden Jewel in Aspen

Anonymous wrote:What did her handbag designing career entail? I've never seen any of them, just read this repeatedly about her, with no details. Did she work for someone else or have her own line?

I suspect this career was greatly exaggerated as much Hollywood PR is and then the statement gets repeated over and over.

Anyone know?

I think handbag designer = decorator=designer. Basically a hobby that she thinks she is monetizing.

With that logic, I am happy to announce that I am a photo stylist.

What did her handbag designing career entail? I've never seen any of them, just read this repeatedly about her, with no details. Did she work for someone else or have her own line?

I suspect this career was greatly exaggerated as much Hollywood PR is and then the statement gets repeated over and over.

Anyone know?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think the people in Hollywood with influence would side with Kevin. The men can imagine their spouse trying to break the prenup and they don't like that; and the women that work in the industry would not be very sympathetic to Christine. Outside of being a mom, she should have developed some type of pet project over the past 18 years.

Hollywood will always side with the more powerful member of the couple. When Clint Eastwood dumped Sondra Locke she was quickly dropped by Maria Shriver and several other women she had considered her close friends.

Eastwood is a good comparison because he too is a d1ckhead cheater with numerous children, not all even acknowledged. The difference between Locke and CB is that Locke had a career in Hollywood and got blackballed.

She was an adult who made her own choices. Locke was estranged from her whole family so she came into that relationship with issues.

Clint Eastwood, Tiger Woods, and Kevin Costner are also adults who made their own choices as to which women to be with and how to treat them....obviously they have issues, too.

Never said they didn't. But this idea that a smart, educated, attractive woman with talent needs to stay with a wealthy male star is ridiculous.

Part of the problem is that these women aren't necessarily smart and educated with talent. Attractive, yes.

I was referring primarily to Locke but the others aren't airheads, either.

PP here. I don't disagree with you, but I doubt they could come close to the lifestyle that came with dating/living with/married to any of those three men.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think the people in Hollywood with influence would side with Kevin. The men can imagine their spouse trying to break the prenup and they don't like that; and the women that work in the industry would not be very sympathetic to Christine. Outside of being a mom, she should have developed some type of pet project over the past 18 years.

Hollywood will always side with the more powerful member of the couple. When Clint Eastwood dumped Sondra Locke she was quickly dropped by Maria Shriver and several other women she had considered her close friends.

Eastwood is a good comparison because he too is a d1ckhead cheater with numerous children, not all even acknowledged. The difference between Locke and CB is that Locke had a career in Hollywood and got blackballed.

She was an adult who made her own choices. Locke was estranged from her whole family so she came into that relationship with issues.

Clint Eastwood, Tiger Woods, and Kevin Costner are also adults who made their own choices as to which women to be with and how to treat them....obviously they have issues, too.

Never said they didn't. But this idea that a smart, educated, attractive woman with talent needs to stay with a wealthy male star is ridiculous.

Part of the problem is that these women aren't necessarily smart and educated with talent. Attractive, yes.

I was referring primarily to Locke but the others aren't airheads, either.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think the people in Hollywood with influence would side with Kevin. The men can imagine their spouse trying to break the prenup and they don't like that; and the women that work in the industry would not be very sympathetic to Christine. Outside of being a mom, she should have developed some type of pet project over the past 18 years.

He reminds me of Tiger Woods. Uses women.

Costner's WIFE FILED FOR DIVORCE, you nitwits. She presumably did so because she wanted out while she could still tap child support for 3 teens and still cite Yellowstone income. Had she waited another year it would only be 2 teens in the house and his income for 2023 is presumably going to be quite low.

Elin Nordegren filed for divorce from Tiger Woods for valid reasons. He uses women.

Bo
Nordegren walked off with $100 million though.

She had a lot of suitors when Tiger came along and has started a family with her new partner. Her net worth is estimated at $200m.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think the people in Hollywood with influence would side with Kevin. The men can imagine their spouse trying to break the prenup and they don't like that; and the women that work in the industry would not be very sympathetic to Christine. Outside of being a mom, she should have developed some type of pet project over the past 18 years.

He reminds me of Tiger Woods. Uses women.

Costner's WIFE FILED FOR DIVORCE, you nitwits. She presumably did so because she wanted out while she could still tap child support for 3 teens and still cite Yellowstone income. Had she waited another year it would only be 2 teens in the house and his income for 2023 is presumably going to be quite low.

Elin Nordegren filed for divorce from Tiger Woods for valid reasons. He uses women.

Bo
Nordegren walked off with $100 million though.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think the people in Hollywood with influence would side with Kevin. The men can imagine their spouse trying to break the prenup and they don't like that; and the women that work in the industry would not be very sympathetic to Christine. Outside of being a mom, she should have developed some type of pet project over the past 18 years.

Hollywood will always side with the more powerful member of the couple. When Clint Eastwood dumped Sondra Locke she was quickly dropped by Maria Shriver and several other women she had considered her close friends.

Eastwood is a good comparison because he too is a d1ckhead cheater with numerous children, not all even acknowledged. The difference between Locke and CB is that Locke had a career in Hollywood and got blackballed.

She was an adult who made her own choices. Locke was estranged from her whole family so she came into that relationship with issues.

Clint Eastwood, Tiger Woods, and Kevin Costner are also adults who made their own choices as to which women to be with and how to treat them....obviously they have issues, too.

Never said they didn't. But this idea that a smart, educated, attractive woman with talent needs to stay with a wealthy male star is ridiculous.

Part of the problem is that these women aren't necessarily smart and educated with talent. Attractive, yes.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think the people in Hollywood with influence would side with Kevin. The men can imagine their spouse trying to break the prenup and they don't like that; and the women that work in the industry would not be very sympathetic to Christine. Outside of being a mom, she should have developed some type of pet project over the past 18 years.

Hollywood will always side with the more powerful member of the couple. When Clint Eastwood dumped Sondra Locke she was quickly dropped by Maria Shriver and several other women she had considered her close friends.

Eastwood is a good comparison because he too is a d1ckhead cheater with numerous children, not all even acknowledged. The difference between Locke and CB is that Locke had a career in Hollywood and got blackballed.

She was an adult who made her own choices. Locke was estranged from her whole family so she came into that relationship with issues.

Clint Eastwood, Tiger Woods, and Kevin Costner are also adults who made their own choices as to which women to be with and how to treat them....obviously they have issues, too.

Never said they didn't. But this idea that a smart, educated, attractive woman with talent needs to stay with a wealthy male star is ridiculous.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think the people in Hollywood with influence would side with Kevin. The men can imagine their spouse trying to break the prenup and they don't like that; and the women that work in the industry would not be very sympathetic to Christine. Outside of being a mom, she should have developed some type of pet project over the past 18 years.

Hollywood will always side with the more powerful member of the couple. When Clint Eastwood dumped Sondra Locke she was quickly dropped by Maria Shriver and several other women she had considered her close friends.

Eastwood is a good comparison because he too is a d1ckhead cheater with numerous children, not all even acknowledged. The difference between Locke and CB is that Locke had a career in Hollywood and got blackballed.

She was an adult who made her own choices. Locke was estranged from her whole family so she came into that relationship with issues.

Clint Eastwood, Tiger Woods, and Kevin Costner are also adults who made their own choices as to which women to be with and how to treat them....obviously they have issues, too.