Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Having them housed and not on the street is beneficial to the citizens.
Knowing where they are makes it easier for the court to process ( and likely deport) them
Putting them on a bus to Mexico is even more beneficial
Cool. So how do you keep them out?
The wall falls over in the breeze?
What do you want Trump to do to keep them from coming?
Biden has invited anyone and everyone to come. What else do you need to know?
Biden has not invited them. They are still coming.
So what do you want Trump to do to stop them from coming?
We've gone over this 100 times before. Please refer to prior threads. No asylum claims heard for anyone inside the US to start.
There is a massive backlog for hearings because Republicans refuse to provide the funding for more judges and officials to examine asylum claims. Over 80% are not legitimate asylum claims. Nor will they reform the visa program to allow needed workers to legally come and live here and work here on the books.
Why won't Republicans provide the funding to expedite, staff up and expel the 80% that are illegitimately here, or help solve any of the other problems? It's almost as though they are going out of their way to worsen the crisis.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Having them housed and not on the street is beneficial to the citizens.
Knowing where they are makes it easier for the court to process ( and likely deport) them
Putting them on a bus to Mexico is even more beneficial
Cool. So how do you keep them out?
The wall falls over in the breeze?
What do you want Trump to do to keep them from coming?
Biden has invited anyone and everyone to come. What else do you need to know?
Biden has not invited them. They are still coming.
So what do you want Trump to do to stop them from coming?
We've gone over this 100 times before. Please refer to prior threads. No asylum claims heard for anyone inside the US to start.
There is a massive backlog for hearings because Republicans refuse to provide the funding for more judges and officials to examine asylum claims. Over 80% are not legitimate asylum claims. Nor will they reform the visa program to allow needed workers to legally come and live here and work here on the books.
Why won't Republicans provide the funding to expedite, staff up and expel the 80% that are illegitimately here, or help solve any of the other problems? It's almost as though they are going out of their way to worsen the crisis.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Having them housed and not on the street is beneficial to the citizens.
Knowing where they are makes it easier for the court to process ( and likely deport) them
Putting them on a bus to Mexico is even more beneficial
Cool. So how do you keep them out?
The wall falls over in the breeze?
What do you want Trump to do to keep them from coming?
Biden has invited anyone and everyone to come. What else do you need to know?
Biden has not invited them. They are still coming.
So what do you want Trump to do to stop them from coming?
We've gone over this 100 times before. Please refer to prior threads. No asylum claims heard for anyone inside the US to start.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Having them housed and not on the street is beneficial to the citizens.
Knowing where they are makes it easier for the court to process ( and likely deport) them
Putting them on a bus to Mexico is even more beneficial
Cool. So how do you keep them out?
The wall falls over in the breeze?
What do you want Trump to do to keep them from coming?
It is not a stretch to say that Trump did a much more effective job than Biden on this issue.
I have no doubt he can do it again. He will begin by enforcing our current immigration laws. And, supporting border patrol.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:People need to understand that although the US is obligated by law to hear all the asylum claims, expanding the infrastructure is just inviting more people.
Reinstalling Remain in Mexico and expanding it to those with kids would help though, along with diminishing the number of immigration courts here in the US. Arrange for field hearings in Mexico and make them swift and send people back except for those who meet the definition of asylum seekers to a t. No gang violence should fly.
The word will spread like it did by the end of Trump’s presidency. There won’t be an abrupt stop but it will cease in time.
All the money spent on shelters and whatnot should be spent on setting up facilities in Mexico.
Mexico is not going to build any facilities. They do not want them there. 80% of the current wave are from Venezuela, with the second largest # coming from Ecuador. Mexico wants the migrants to pass through. If they stay in Mexico, they will be stuck there and the MX gov't will have to deal with it. Better to let them move north to the US.
Unfortunately, we have given 500K Venezuelan migrants TPS, which sucks becuase now they'll be here forever. We have no way of conducting background checks on these individuals, and VZ currently has the highest murder and crime rates in all of Latin America. This absolutely sucks.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:NYC is a sanctuary city. I don’t understand how this could be an emergency.
because a bunch were dumped on them by another state who had no authority to do that. Those governors lied to the people and were basically human traffickers for a political stunt.
But weren’t those unlawful immigrants dumped in those other states by a federal govt that isn’t enforcing security at the border because doing so is unpopular with the political class in those states now doing the complaining?
So you think small, under resourced towns in rural Texas should absorb the massive costs of dealing with a huge influx of people who shouldn’t be here, but draw the line when a few hundred show up in NYC?
And see, this is my point exactly. I am a democrat that thinks we have a responsibility to help many, many more people coming to the US. At the same time, it is not ethical to expect ONLY the states that share a border with Mexico to be the ones to bear the burden. It must fall on all of us. There are humans who need our help. We all must help financially, physically, etc.
Seriously- how do you defend that?
Anonymous wrote:
A 34-year-old migrant man molested a 7-year-old girl at knifepoint at a Queens hotel housing asylum seekers after he lured the child and her twin sister to his room there, police sources said Thursday.
The sisters, asylum seekers staying at the Hotel Mint JFK Airport in Far Rockaway with their family, were playing in the hallway around 9:30 p.m. Wednesday when the sicko convinced them to follow him to a room on the second floor, according to the sources.
He then placed a knife against the neck of one of the girls and touched her private area, the sources said.
When the twins’ mother knocked on the door, the perv jumped out the window, the sources said.
The creep then walked back into the building through the lobby, where he was confronted by the young victim’s older brother — and a fight ensued.
Cops broke up the brawl and arrested the alleged child molester, according to the sources. Charges against him were pending Thursday. His name was not released by the NYPD.
Anonymous wrote:People need to understand that although the US is obligated by law to hear all the asylum claims, expanding the infrastructure is just inviting more people.
Reinstalling Remain in Mexico and expanding it to those with kids would help though, along with diminishing the number of immigration courts here in the US. Arrange for field hearings in Mexico and make them swift and send people back except for those who meet the definition of asylum seekers to a t. No gang violence should fly.
The word will spread like it did by the end of Trump’s presidency. There won’t be an abrupt stop but it will cease in time.
All the money spent on shelters and whatnot should be spent on setting up facilities in Mexico.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This is not an emergency. The plan is to flood the country to the point of collapse. Yes, this the uncomfortable part. But don’t worry, things will be swell when globalism comes to the rescue. The people in Brussels know what is best for you and your family.
+ 1,000 - Do Democrats understated this???
Oh, some do now. They are talking to each other with open mouths saying “how did this HAPPEN?” Then they go to the ballot box and vote for more. Rinse. Repeat.
+1
The very definition of insanity.
DP
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This is not an emergency. The plan is to flood the country to the point of collapse. Yes, this the uncomfortable part. But don’t worry, things will be swell when globalism comes to the rescue. The people in Brussels know what is best for you and your family.
+ 1,000 - Do Democrats understated this???
Oh, some do now. They are talking to each other with open mouths saying “how did this HAPPEN?” Then they go to the ballot box and vote for more. Rinse. Repeat.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Having them housed and not on the street is beneficial to the citizens.
Knowing where they are makes it easier for the court to process ( and likely deport) them
Putting them on a bus to Mexico is even more beneficial
Cool. So how do you keep them out?
The wall falls over in the breeze?
What do you want Trump to do to keep them from coming?
Biden has invited anyone and everyone to come. What else do you need to know?
Biden has not invited them. They are still coming.
So what do you want Trump to do to stop them from coming?
We've gone over this 100 times before. Please refer to prior threads. No asylum claims heard for anyone inside the US to start.