Will this get bogged down and buried in the Senate?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
Please note that if Trump really wants to release the Epstein files, he can do that by himself without Congress.

So all this is a farce.

He will not veto but Bondi will say the files cannot be released because of ongoing investigation of Bill Clinton and other Democrats.

This past summer, didn’t the DOJ put out a statement saying they had thoroughly reviewed the files and they contained nothing that would warrant any prosecutions?

Yes DOJ did that in July. https://www.justice.gov/opa/media/1407001/dl?inline

Anonymous wrote:I can't believe Jim Jordan dared to say he wants to protect victims.

So sad that he didn't want to protect the wrestling team at Ohio State!

A 427-1 vote.

How is Mike Johnson still the Speaker?

He's been carrying Trump's garbage for a long time. Even denying newly elected off year Representatives to get sworn in so that Republicans could avoid voting on this.

And he gets rewarded for his trouble with a 427-1 vote. Mike Johnson is the most Beta man on the planet. And this is what Republicans choose as their leader.

Pathetic.

Anonymous wrote:If this is just a farce and hoax and bad for the Dems then why all the drama?

exactly!

Anonymous wrote:I want to ask you democrats why you did not do a damn thing about the Epstein files while Biden was president?

Republicans would not allow it. Look at how Ghislaine Maxwell has gotten special treatment since Trump has gotten back in. Look at how only 4 republicans signed the discharge petition.

Republicans and Trump are full involved in stopping any information coming out.

I can't believe Jim Jordan dared to say he wants to protect victims.

Anonymous wrote:427 yes
1 no

Holy holy holy! UN-BE-EFFING-LIEVABJE!

If only they could pass an appropriation bill as easily!

Anonymous wrote:427 yes
1 no

Holy holy holy! UN-BE-EFFING-LIEVABJE!

Only person who voted against was clay Higgins from Louisiana who is quite an unpleasant individual if you have time to look at his Wikipedia page.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:so...they lied?

Who?

The DOJ when they said nothing in the files warranted further investigation.

Now, lo and behold they want to investigate more.

So they lied, or were incompetent, or both.

It’s a democrats plot.

The democrats control Pam Bondi? Do explain.

If this is just a farce and hoax and bad for the Dems then why all the drama?

Now that Trump is seemingly ok with it I just don't trust that what is to be released is all of the original 'files'.

I bet the Saudi prince is holding his mise because Trump had just had a huge blowout and his diaper needs changing! With a bit of luck trump's carotid artery could burst.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:My other post got blocked so I am re-posting here. If you search “Clarence” in the House Epstein files collection the most disturbing email comes up. I’ve been searching names that I think might appear and this one is shocking. I haven’t seen it reported in the news anywhere.

It is definitely NSFW

What does it say??

https://journaliststudio.google.com/pinpoint/document-view?collection=092314e384a58618&utm_source=collection_share_link&p=1&docid=a148ed629b5d0077_092314e384a58618_0&dapvm=2

Wow. So basically it's an acknowledgement that Anita Hill's accusations about Justice Thomas were in fact true and Thomas laughed about it with others - and then lied under oath during his confirmation hearing.

No surprise there. Several women women wanted to testify in the Thomas hearings to corroborate Anita Hill’s testimony. They were not called to speak by the Senate Judiciary Committee. Every woman that I know believed Anita Hill. We still do.

Well, you don't know me.
When I found out that Anita Hill had continued to be friendly with Thomas after the "incidents" she described, I figured it was a set up.

Biden orchestrated the whole thing.

If she worked with him, she had to get along with him.

+ I think many of the younger set would be surprised about what women had to put up with in the workplace.

The younger set should watch “Mad Men” to get a little taste of what it was like for women in the workplace in the 60s and 70s.

Heck, just watch the female reporter being told “Quiet, piggy” by Trump the other day, after she brought up the Epstein files.

I read the transcript that was posted from Substack, and my first thought was how much it sounded like the way he spoke to Katie Johnson throughout her testimony.

Absolutely. Everything we know about Trump and his character today is exactly the same as Katie Johnson” account in 2016.

Her recruiter “Tiffany” corroborated her back then:

https://www.courthousenews.com/rape-allegations-refiled-against-trump/

If these two women were to have the best lawyers and the best security today that would absolutely be the end of Trump. But everyone seems to be afraid…

427 yes
1 no

Holy holy holy! UN-BE-EFFING-LIEVABJE!