Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Democrat Melanie Stansbury on CNN:“We’ve all seen the photographs of Donald Trump with underage girls sitting on his lap.”
I’m sorry what? Where are these pictures? Or are we just saying things now?
Apparently they're out there, and they've been mentioned for decades. But she's lying when she says we've all seen them.
Meanwhile Epstein fed Democrat Rep. Stacey Plaskett questions during a congressional hearing in 2019.
This has been a hoax from the beginning.
Democrats conspired with the pedophile himself against President Trump.
I would love to learn everything about the relationship between Plaskett and Epstein. Also, everything about the relationship between Trump and Epstein, which seems like it might be a longer story.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Nothing screams “Trump was all up in Epstein’s sick world and lovin’ it” louder than ordering DOJ to start digging up the names of Democrats also on the island.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2025/11/14/trump-justice-epstein-democrats/?itid=hp-mv-top-stories_top-table-main_p001_f001
Sure, we care, very much so, we need the full list of participants, dead and alive, but the big problem the country needs to address is the current POTUS right here, right now in 2025. Should he be in prison and on the sex offender list for the rest of his pathetic life? That’s the pressing question.
Clinton being involved isn’t going to make Trump any less guilty. He can throw the ball, but why oh why would we follow. He’s the POTUS, and a POTUS well-known for being an perv. And he’s been abusing this country and its people and their tax dollars since he stepped back in the Oval office. Many of us, including MAGA, would still want him impeached and removed (along with all the gold crap); Clinton’s involvement isn’t going to change that one bit.
Dinner convo last night: Trump releases Clinton files, do you think Clinton is going to sit there without also bringing Trump down? With Trump’s dementia the possibility for a bad calm is infinite.
Anonymous wrote:
FOUR: that’s the number of years Biden was in office & could have released whatever he wanted.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
What are you getting at? They seem to be talking about some other criminal case. The "Reid" they refer to is most likely Reid Weingarten. White collar criminal defense attorney at Steptoe. Also, one of Epstein's lawyers.
Reid Hoffman. He's a liberal tech bro.
A bit of web searching and AI.
information from the web page provides a much more specific and definitive interpretation of that September 19, 2014, email between Kathryn Ruemmler and Jeffrey Epstein:
The "Reid" referenced is most likely Reid H. Weingarten, a defense attorney [1.14].
"Reid's guy" is John G. Rowland, the former Republican Governor of Connecticut [1.8].
"Went down on all 7 counts" refers to Rowland's conviction by a federal jury on all seven felony counts (conspiracy, obstruction of justice, and falsifying records) on that specific day in 2014 [1.8].
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:For the 1000th time, we Dems don't give a sh*t if the Epstein files implicate Dems. RELEASE THE FILES and let's hold ALL those involved accountable.
Why are Republicans so chickensh*t to do the same?
Drop the games. You are protecting pedophiles. We are not.
The Democratic Party will protect their own while trying to make the republicans be the ones to take the blame.
And the republicans will protect their own while trying to make democrats take the blame.
I trust none of them.
Just stop. Bill Clinton WANTS the files released. Go ahead and investigate him. It won’t stop the investigation because leaks are coming from outside the house.
Bondi will play all the Trump games making them look guilty as hell. May 2025 Pam Bondi informed Trump that his name appears multiple times in the Epstein files. Trump lied when a reporter questioned him about Bondi confirming his name appeared the files.
Trump knew nothing about it.
Republicans and “Christian” extremists are sexually assaulting children in staggering numbers, covering for the pervert’steins and Orthodox Jews. Unredacted documents are easily accessible. Only victims names are redacted and/or pseudonyms.
Case 1:16-cv-07673-UA Document 4-1
Brace yourselves.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
What are you getting at? They seem to be talking about some other criminal case. The "Reid" they refer to is most likely Reid Weingarten. White collar criminal defense attorney at Steptoe. Also, one of Epstein's lawyers.
Reid Hoffman. He's a liberal tech bro.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Look, for the ten-thousandth time:
Anything about Democrats involved is an AND, not a BUT. Someone from my party did something awful, or even shady? Then take them down, too.
It's an "and." add it to the list. Prosecute.
However, it's no excuse for anyone else. You shouldn't take it as exculpatory for anyone in your party. You should be joining me -- as an "and" for any new evidence -- to take them all down.
MAGA are hopeless. They cannot view this as anything other than a political team sport, with one side winning and ther other losing. On Twitter, they are going on about the Dems release of emails "backfiring" because Dems are tied up in it.
It's beyond them to understand the horrors of human trafficking and sexual exploitation and the desire for justice.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:For the 1000th time, we Dems don't give a sh*t if the Epstein files implicate Dems. RELEASE THE FILES and let's hold ALL those involved accountable.
Why are Republicans so chickensh*t to do the same?
Drop the games. You are protecting pedophiles. We are not.
FOUR: that’s the number of years Biden was in office & could have released whatever he wanted.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Remember, Leavitt’s husband was 47 when she was 15, so she may not have the clearest vision about how wrong this operation was.
(Not saying they knew each other at that time, but pointing out that she may not share our disgust about older men who get off on sex with MUCH younger women)
Karoline worked for Trump during college, in his first administration. She gave birth to a baby at 25 during the 2024 campaign. When the baby was 7 months old she married a man 33 years her senior despite no history of any romance between them. Her husband is a real estate millionaire and Trump acolyte. It makes no sense that a rich man would want his wife working and traveling when “their” child is in tender years. Trump waxes about her beauty and her lips. Who is the real father?
You sound like a foreign troll.
FYSA: “Tender age” is how ICE refers to its concentration camps for kids under 5.
https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/tender-age-shelters/story?id=56028638
I agree that “Homeland Security” has always sounded like a term imported from someplace else.
“Homeland” has always sounded Nazi to me.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:For the 1000th time, we Dems don't give a sh*t if the Epstein files implicate Dems. RELEASE THE FILES and let's hold ALL those involved accountable.
Why are Republicans so chickensh*t to do the same?
Drop the games. You are protecting pedophiles. We are not.
FOUR: that’s the number of years Biden was in office & could have released whatever he wanted.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:For the 1000th time, we Dems don't give a sh*t if the Epstein files implicate Dems. RELEASE THE FILES and let's hold ALL those involved accountable.
Why are Republicans so chickensh*t to do the same?
Drop the games. You are protecting pedophiles. We are not.
The Democratic Party will protect their own while trying to make the republicans be the ones to take the blame.
And the republicans will protect their own while trying to make democrats take the blame.
I trust none of them.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:We do not know whose name was redacted.
Republicans have stated that it was a victim who has stated that Mr. Trump did nothing inappropriate. This helps Mr. Trump if, in fact, that was the name which was redacted.
A real concern regarding the Epstein files is whether or not it contains allegations and details of money laundering for Russia. This concern was raised recently by a prominent Democrat strategist on a major cable news network a couple of days ago.
That’s far from the only real concern. Who knows what’s in there but there is obviously stuff in there that Trump is desperate to keep hidden.
To me, to strangest rumor going around (based on the emails) has to do with a possible sexual relationship between Trump and “bubba,” who people assume is exactly who you think it is.
There is allegedly an email between the brothers epstein where the one who wasn't a convicted pedo asks the other if "Putin has the photo of trump blowing bubba"
I don't believe it. The emails are now publicly available. You can post any of them here. Do so.
Searchable database:
https://couriernewsroom.com/news/we-created-a-searchable-database-with-all-20000-files-from-epsteins-estate/
It’s true.
The reference to the movie "Get Hard" can be taken two ways:
1. Trump did blow bubba
2. Trump did something illegal and might go to prison, referencing this movie about a white man turning to a black man to help him get ready to go to prison
https://www.imdb.com/title/tt2561572/
"the photo" It seems beyond belief the donnie tee would blow anyone, much less bubba (charismatic as he was) but trump has done so much unbelievable sh it in public at his rallies, pressers and on twitter. I think he did blow bubba and there is a picture of it somewhere.
I took the statement as sarcasm joke. Like is trump done sucking off Clinton, yet?
Well, I don't have a penis and I tend to take dick "jokes" literally.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:For the 1000th time, we Dems don't give a sh*t if the Epstein files implicate Dems. RELEASE THE FILES and let's hold ALL those involved accountable.
Why are Republicans so chickensh*t to do the same?
Drop the games. You are protecting pedophiles. We are not.
FOUR: that’s the number of years Biden was in office & could have released whatever he wanted.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:For the 1000th time, we Dems don't give a sh*t if the Epstein files implicate Dems. RELEASE THE FILES and let's hold ALL those involved accountable.
Why are Republicans so chickensh*t to do the same?
Drop the games. You are protecting pedophiles. We are not.
FOUR: that’s the number of years Biden was in office & could have released whatever he wanted.