Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:You gotta hand it to this fan boi, he loves him some Usha.

Oh no, that dress is HORRIBLE. Why, Usha, why????

I agree. UGLY!!

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She’s got great arms. And I love that lipstick shade on her.

+1
There don’t seem to be any clear pictures of them, but even with her eyes closed in this picture, she looks stunning.

She’s a very attractive woman but stunning? No. This is a nice, blurry photo. She has a lovely smile. She looks happiest next to her sleazy husband, which is kind of tragic.

Look, I get that your political hangups prevent you from simply discussing fashion/beauty, but maybe grow up and leave your political sniping on the political forum.

She does indeed look stunning.

Contrary to your opinion it’s possible for multiple thoughts to exist in one’s head at the same time. I think she’s a fascist but she is a reasonably attractive woman. She usually dresses pretty poorly but was nicely coiffed at this event. No, she’s not “stunning.” You can feel free to think so and I can feel free to disagree.

I think she looks really pretty in the picture but not in an "exotic" way. The lipstick and the wide smile also go a long way here.

I've said it before and I'll say it again. Older white women think she's "stunning" because she's different. They're the same type of people that 30-40 years ago would tell me my South Asian mom she was "exotic".

You have a lot of baggage around your ethnicity. I am not an "older white woman" and I think she's beautiful. I guess you're going to just have to deal with people genuinely finding her very pretty, even stunning. Her race/ethnicity has zero to do with it.

She is pretty but stunning seems like a really really big stretch 😂

100% I don't know why but there is one person here that goes on and on about how she's stunning, and it's so weird. She's pretty, absolutely, but she's no Bollywood beauty.

JFC. No one ever made that claim. You people are too much. To say someone looks stunning at a certain event is completely normal. Her hair and makeup did indeed look stunning and I’d love to know who did both.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:You gotta hand it to this fan boi, he loves him some Usha.

Lol. I actually like that outfit a lot. It's vaguely Kate Middleton-ish.

I like it too. Twist front is very flattering.

Not with the pattern, it does weird things to her breasts. It's awful.

Disagree. It’s got a cool pattern and aesthetic.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:You gotta hand it to this fan boi, he loves him some Usha.

Oh no, that dress is HORRIBLE. Why, Usha, why????

I like it. But not with the flats. I would have worn either tall boots or heels. Either way, I like the dress.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She’s got great arms. And I love that lipstick shade on her.

+1
There don’t seem to be any clear pictures of them, but even with her eyes closed in this picture, she looks stunning.

She’s a very attractive woman but stunning? No. This is a nice, blurry photo. She has a lovely smile. She looks happiest next to her sleazy husband, which is kind of tragic.

Look, I get that your political hangups prevent you from simply discussing fashion/beauty, but maybe grow up and leave your political sniping on the political forum.

She does indeed look stunning.

Contrary to your opinion it’s possible for multiple thoughts to exist in one’s head at the same time. I think she’s a fascist but she is a reasonably attractive woman. She usually dresses pretty poorly but was nicely coiffed at this event. No, she’s not “stunning.” You can feel free to think so and I can feel free to disagree.

I think she looks really pretty in the picture but not in an "exotic" way. The lipstick and the wide smile also go a long way here.

I've said it before and I'll say it again. Older white women think she's "stunning" because she's different. They're the same type of people that 30-40 years ago would tell me my South Asian mom she was "exotic".

You have a lot of baggage around your ethnicity. I am not an "older white woman" and I think she's beautiful. I guess you're going to just have to deal with people genuinely finding her very pretty, even stunning. Her race/ethnicity has zero to do with it.

She is pretty but stunning seems like a really really big stretch 😂

I’m that poster and I said she LOOKED stunning in that photo - which she absolutely did.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:You gotta hand it to this fan boi, he loves him some Usha.

Lol. I actually like that outfit a lot. It's vaguely Kate Middleton-ish.

I like it too. Twist front is very flattering.

Not with the pattern, it does weird things to her breasts. It's awful.

Agree. It creates a dizzying spiral effect that wouldn't happen in a solid or perhaps other print.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She’s got great arms. And I love that lipstick shade on her.

+1
There don’t seem to be any clear pictures of them, but even with her eyes closed in this picture, she looks stunning.

She’s a very attractive woman but stunning? No. This is a nice, blurry photo. She has a lovely smile. She looks happiest next to her sleazy husband, which is kind of tragic.

Look, I get that your political hangups prevent you from simply discussing fashion/beauty, but maybe grow up and leave your political sniping on the political forum.

She does indeed look stunning.

Contrary to your opinion it’s possible for multiple thoughts to exist in one’s head at the same time. I think she’s a fascist but she is a reasonably attractive woman. She usually dresses pretty poorly but was nicely coiffed at this event. No, she’s not “stunning.” You can feel free to think so and I can feel free to disagree.

I think she looks really pretty in the picture but not in an "exotic" way. The lipstick and the wide smile also go a long way here.

I've said it before and I'll say it again. Older white women think she's "stunning" because she's different. They're the same type of people that 30-40 years ago would tell me my South Asian mom she was "exotic".

You have a lot of baggage around your ethnicity. I am not an "older white woman" and I think she's beautiful. I guess you're going to just have to deal with people genuinely finding her very pretty, even stunning. Her race/ethnicity has zero to do with it.

Huh? Not the poster you’re replying to but people here say she’s cute all the time. Just not stunning.

Ok? And anytime someone dares to call her beautiful or even stunning, the lady with the baggage about her mother pipes up to insist that we couldn’t possibly find her stunning and that we only say that because of her ethnicity. It’s truly bizarre. We can have our own opinions without anyone lecturing us as to why we should or should not feel a certain way.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She’s got great arms. And I love that lipstick shade on her.

+1
There don’t seem to be any clear pictures of them, but even with her eyes closed in this picture, she looks stunning.

She’s a very attractive woman but stunning? No. This is a nice, blurry photo. She has a lovely smile. She looks happiest next to her sleazy husband, which is kind of tragic.

Look, I get that your political hangups prevent you from simply discussing fashion/beauty, but maybe grow up and leave your political sniping on the political forum.

She does indeed look stunning.

Contrary to your opinion it’s possible for multiple thoughts to exist in one’s head at the same time. I think she’s a fascist but she is a reasonably attractive woman. She usually dresses pretty poorly but was nicely coiffed at this event. No, she’s not “stunning.” You can feel free to think so and I can feel free to disagree.

I think she looks really pretty in the picture but not in an "exotic" way. The lipstick and the wide smile also go a long way here.

I've said it before and I'll say it again. Older white women think she's "stunning" because she's different. They're the same type of people that 30-40 years ago would tell me my South Asian mom she was "exotic".

You have a lot of baggage around your ethnicity. I am not an "older white woman" and I think she's beautiful. I guess you're going to just have to deal with people genuinely finding her very pretty, even stunning. Her race/ethnicity has zero to do with it.

She is pretty but stunning seems like a really really big stretch 😂

100% I don't know why but there is one person here that goes on and on about how she's stunning, and it's so weird. She's pretty, absolutely, but she's no Bollywood beauty.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:You gotta hand it to this fan boi, he loves him some Usha.

Lol. I actually like that outfit a lot. It's vaguely Kate Middleton-ish.

I like it too. Twist front is very flattering.

Not with the pattern, it does weird things to her breasts. It's awful.

Anonymous wrote:You gotta hand it to this fan boi, he loves him some Usha.

Oh no, that dress is HORRIBLE. Why, Usha, why????

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She’s got great arms. And I love that lipstick shade on her.

+1
There don’t seem to be any clear pictures of them, but even with her eyes closed in this picture, she looks stunning.

She’s a very attractive woman but stunning? No. This is a nice, blurry photo. She has a lovely smile. She looks happiest next to her sleazy husband, which is kind of tragic.

Look, I get that your political hangups prevent you from simply discussing fashion/beauty, but maybe grow up and leave your political sniping on the political forum.

She does indeed look stunning.

Contrary to your opinion it’s possible for multiple thoughts to exist in one’s head at the same time. I think she’s a fascist but she is a reasonably attractive woman. She usually dresses pretty poorly but was nicely coiffed at this event. No, she’s not “stunning.” You can feel free to think so and I can feel free to disagree.

I think she looks really pretty in the picture but not in an "exotic" way. The lipstick and the wide smile also go a long way here.

I've said it before and I'll say it again. Older white women think she's "stunning" because she's different. They're the same type of people that 30-40 years ago would tell me my South Asian mom she was "exotic".

You have a lot of baggage around your ethnicity. I am not an "older white woman" and I think she's beautiful. I guess you're going to just have to deal with people genuinely finding her very pretty, even stunning. Her race/ethnicity has zero to do with it.

She is pretty but stunning seems like a really really big stretch 😂

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She’s got great arms. And I love that lipstick shade on her.

+1
There don’t seem to be any clear pictures of them, but even with her eyes closed in this picture, she looks stunning.

She’s a very attractive woman but stunning? No. This is a nice, blurry photo. She has a lovely smile. She looks happiest next to her sleazy husband, which is kind of tragic.

Look, I get that your political hangups prevent you from simply discussing fashion/beauty, but maybe grow up and leave your political sniping on the political forum.

She does indeed look stunning.

Contrary to your opinion it’s possible for multiple thoughts to exist in one’s head at the same time. I think she’s a fascist but she is a reasonably attractive woman. She usually dresses pretty poorly but was nicely coiffed at this event. No, she’s not “stunning.” You can feel free to think so and I can feel free to disagree.

I think she looks really pretty in the picture but not in an "exotic" way. The lipstick and the wide smile also go a long way here.

I've said it before and I'll say it again. Older white women think she's "stunning" because she's different. They're the same type of people that 30-40 years ago would tell me my South Asian mom she was "exotic".

You have a lot of baggage around your ethnicity. I am not an "older white woman" and I think she's beautiful. I guess you're going to just have to deal with people genuinely finding her very pretty, even stunning. Her race/ethnicity has zero to do with it.

Huh? Not the poster you’re replying to but people here say she’s cute all the time. Just not stunning.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

I’m glad to hear that’s vintage! I saw it and thought cute but looks very late 80s early 90s. If it’s vintage that makes sense.

Yes, it does have a vintage look, and I kind of like it, not gonna lie. Reminds me of early 90s prom dresses.

I really like it. And she has a killer figure, so it looks particularly good on her.

Kind of has an Ivanna era look. Missing the updo, though!

I bet it’s her mother’s dress. She has worn Ivana’s Macki dresses before.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She’s got great arms. And I love that lipstick shade on her.

+1
There don’t seem to be any clear pictures of them, but even with her eyes closed in this picture, she looks stunning.

She’s a very attractive woman but stunning? No. This is a nice, blurry photo. She has a lovely smile. She looks happiest next to her sleazy husband, which is kind of tragic.

Look, I get that your political hangups prevent you from simply discussing fashion/beauty, but maybe grow up and leave your political sniping on the political forum.

She does indeed look stunning.

Contrary to your opinion it’s possible for multiple thoughts to exist in one’s head at the same time. I think she’s a fascist but she is a reasonably attractive woman. She usually dresses pretty poorly but was nicely coiffed at this event. No, she’s not “stunning.” You can feel free to think so and I can feel free to disagree.

I think she looks really pretty in the picture but not in an "exotic" way. The lipstick and the wide smile also go a long way here.

I've said it before and I'll say it again. Older white women think she's "stunning" because she's different. They're the same type of people that 30-40 years ago would tell me my South Asian mom she was "exotic".

You have a lot of baggage around your ethnicity. I am not an "older white woman" and I think she's beautiful. I guess you're going to just have to deal with people genuinely finding her very pretty, even stunning. Her race/ethnicity has zero to do with it.

Because the pattern does one direction it creates an illusion of mismatched breasts (I'd say boobs but I detest that word)