Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I just don’t think there is enough votes left. We lost.
NYT still gives ossoff 91% chance to win.
Anonymous wrote:I just don’t think there is enough votes left. We lost.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:CNN sounds a lot more pessimistic for the Dems, unless I'm misunderstanding.
The actual reported votes are still in toss-up territory, but the final predictions are squarely in the Democrats' favor, because precincts still tallying votes are Democratic strongholds.
This is why you see such a big difference between CNN numbers (current vote tallies) and the NYT needle (final predictions), for instance.
I just switched to CNN. They are shockingly more pessimistic. I have been watching the NYT needle all night and feeling great but John King was acting like there aren’t enough votes out there for ossoff to catch up. I think/hope he’s wrong but it’s weird.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Ha ha ha.
Just think of McConnell right now.
4 years hating Trump yet forced to follow his every whim. Then not saying a word in defense of our elections and our institutions. All for nothing, because now he'll be in the minority.
Every whim? Trump said send the $2k - Mitch said no. Nail in coffin was that meaningless $600 check to the plebs.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:CNN sounds a lot more pessimistic for the Dems, unless I'm misunderstanding.
The actual reported votes are still in toss-up territory, but the final predictions are squarely in the Democrats' favor, because precincts still tallying votes are Democratic strongholds.
This is why you see such a big difference between CNN numbers (current vote tallies) and the NYT needle (final predictions), for instance.
I just switched to CNN. They are shockingly more pessimistic. I have been watching the NYT needle all night and feeling great but John King was acting like there aren’t enough votes out there for ossoff to catch up. I think/hope he’s wrong but it’s weird.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:CNN sounds a lot more pessimistic for the Dems, unless I'm misunderstanding.
The actual reported votes are still in toss-up territory, but the final predictions are squarely in the Democrats' favor, because precincts still tallying votes are Democratic strongholds.
This is why you see such a big difference between CNN numbers (current vote tallies) and the NYT needle (final predictions), for instance.
Anonymous wrote:CNN sounds a lot more pessimistic for the Dems, unless I'm misunderstanding.
Anonymous wrote:https://twitter.com/only4rm/status/1324736537339301891
Someone’s happy