Former Nixon White House Counsel John Dean tells CNN's @DonLemon that during Michael Cohen's testimony the Republican members of the House Oversight Committee "didn't defend the President. What they did is attack the witness. That shows a certain weakness"
Like Cohen, Dean was a member of the president’s inner circle. He also turned on his onetime boss and cooperated with prosecutors.
Republicans questioning Cohen “had nothing to offer in defense of the president’s character,” Dean said.
Last year, he noted another similarity between himself and Cohen.
“When I became a witness, there was a huge effort to discredit me,” Dean said at the time. “It was just my word against Nixon’s until the tape came out, and they worked mightily to try to discredit me.”
Anonymous wrote:Distract distract distract... this is all the left has and Potus paying his private attorney while in office isnt illegal.
Anonymous wrote:
I believe most people, even supporters of the current administration, know the President to be an unsavory, prejudiced bully who has probably operated his entire life evading taxes and using threats to get what he wants professionally and privately.
Is any of it going to oust him from the Presidency or cause him grief afterward? Maybe not.
A. None of it may rise to crimes committed by the President himself.
B. None of it may be impeachable. Sadly, the President's party is still convinced it needs to support him to get elected.
We just have to face this reality and move on.
Anonymous wrote:
I believe most people, even supporters of the current administration, know the President to be an unsavory, prejudiced bully who has probably operated his entire life evading taxes and using threats to get what he wants professionally and privately.
Is any of it going to oust him from the Presidency or cause him grief afterward? Maybe not.
A. None of it may rise to crimes committed by the President himself.
B. None of it may be impeachable. Sadly, the President's party is still convinced it needs to support him to get elected.
We just have to face this reality and move on.
Anonymous wrote:
I believe most people, even supporters of the current administration, know the President to be an unsavory, prejudiced bully who has probably operated his entire life evading taxes and using threats to get what he wants professionally and privately.
Is any of it going to oust him from the Presidency or cause him grief afterward? Maybe not.
A. None of it may rise to crimes committed by the President himself.
B. None of it may be impeachable. Sadly, the President's party is still convinced it needs to support him to get elected.
We just have to face this reality and move on.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Trump is so f#cked.
So is the GOP.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Just a reminder -
Michael Cohen never went to Prague.
Love how you believe the parts of his testimony that serve your narrative.
Kind of blows the whole dossier narrative, eh?
No, that means that one detail in the dossier might be wrong.
Which makes a lot more of it wrong.
Maybe, maybe not. It is raw intelligence. It's what spies send in from the field before the analysts in Washington assess it, verify it, and form a narrative. Which is what Mueller is doing right now.
See...and that is a problem.
The information in the dossier was used in a FISA warrant request, or several of them. When making such a request, those who sign are saying the information is true and verified. But, you can see it wasn't.
And, it is not Mueller's job to do that..... it should have been done long ago.
Now you are starting to understand why this whole Russian investigation should have never been opened.
Sounds like you don’t want the truth exposed. What are you afraid of?
The truth?
The truth is that this whole RUSSIA investigation was opened for one reason. And, it wasn't because the Trump campaign was colluding with Russia.
There were a few people in leadership positions who were upset at the outcome of the election.
I expect the leadership of the FBI to know the law and follow the law. Is that too much to ask?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Can we get back to analyzing Farah - the curling iron lady???
Haha yes I'm the OP of Farrah. Anyone know who she is? She was over the top in first half testimony...laughing, nodding, crying.
Dena Grayson, twitter personality extraordinare and former Congressional candidate.
https://mobile.twitter.com/DrDenaGrayson
Thank you DCUM friend. Tragicomedy![]()
Anonymous wrote:Trump is so f#cked.