Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:^^ why would they? They have no affordable housing near them. They are used to the status quo - which is them being untouched. If rhetoric really heats up about the west end of Columbia Pike being shifted to Yorktown, I'm sure we'll hear from 22207.
So which is it? The accusations that Yorktown parents "are fighting against FARMS kids being moved to their school" or that they are complacent so unbothered by the whole thing?
There are so many blind prejudices on APS threads.
Anonymous wrote:^^ why would they? They have no affordable housing near them. They are used to the status quo - which is them being untouched. If rhetoric really heats up about the west end of Columbia Pike being shifted to Yorktown, I'm sure we'll hear from 22207.
Anonymous wrote:^^ why would they? They have no affordable housing near them. They are used to the status quo - which is them being untouched. If rhetoric really heats up about the west end of Columbia Pike being shifted to Yorktown, I'm sure we'll hear from 22207.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Just curious - are most of the posters here worried about how it is going to affect them personally and within their neighborhood (in other words, families who reside in the planning units that may get reassigned)? Or is there also a lot of concern coming from families who reside in planning units that are not going to get reassigned, but are nevertheless worried about how decisions based on demographics might impact the school their child attends?
We're assigned to W-L, and our PU is not in play. I wouldn't necessarily mind a shift in the school's demographics, but I think things are pretty good as they stand. Not all lilywhite rich kids, not all kids who need extra attention to make up for any shortcomings of their past experiences at home or school.
I am very concerned that Yorktown families are going to dig in their heels and fight any effort to bring more economically disadvantaged kids their school. I am dubious as to their commitment to the needs of the community as a whole.
Anonymous wrote:Just curious - are most of the posters here worried about how it is going to affect them personally and within their neighborhood (in other words, families who reside in the planning units that may get reassigned)? Or is there also a lot of concern coming from families who reside in planning units that are not going to get reassigned, but are nevertheless worried about how decisions based on demographics might impact the school their child attends?
Anonymous wrote:Just curious - are most of the posters here worried about how it is going to affect them personally and within their neighborhood (in other words, families who reside in the planning units that may get reassigned)? Or is there also a lot of concern coming from families who reside in planning units that are not going to get reassigned, but are nevertheless worried about how decisions based on demographics might impact the school their child attends?
Anonymous wrote:Just curious - are most of the posters here worried about how it is going to affect them personally and within their neighborhood (in other words, families who reside in the planning units that may get reassigned)? Or is there also a lot of concern coming from families who reside in planning units that are not going to get reassigned, but are nevertheless worried about how decisions based on demographics might impact the school their child attends?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Don't assume PP is a troll. It is an interesting point. For everyone on here calling for the importance of diversity and the benefit to the disadvantaged kids at Wakefield, have you already submitting the transfer request to have your child attend Wakefield even though you are zoned for Yorktown or W-L? There is capacity, so your transfer request would be approved. It's very easy to be a liberal in far north Arlington and talk about the importance of diversity, but very hypocritical to not then live it when the opportunity exists.
Arlington county as a whole is about 30% economically disadvantaged, and so is W-L.
Wakefield is about 46%.
Yorktown is about 14%.
Can you see where the problem is?
Totally see it, got it, agree with you. My point, that I pulled out of the PP's post is that considering the number of people on this site saying don't put the western Pike units down at Wakefield, balancing enrollment diversity-wise is important, I'm assuming all those families are lining up to send their kids to Wakefield to help provide some balance there. Otherwise, all the commentary is classic NIMBY - "I want your kids to go there, but not mine" to solve this problem.
Anonymous wrote:
Comments like this are a huge turn off and strengthen the divide. People who would like to work towards a solution to these problems turn away at the mudslinging. You handicap the cause that you claim to care about.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
The real problem is that there are six elementary schools over 50% and six elementary schools under 5%.
They're both real problems. There is no limit to the numbers of real problems Arlington can have (most of them live in 22207)
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
The real problem is that there are six elementary schools over 50% and six elementary schools under 5%.
They're both real problems. There is no limit to the numbers of real problems Arlington can have (most of them live in 22207)
Anonymous wrote:
The real problem is that there are six elementary schools over 50% and six elementary schools under 5%.