Anonymous wrote:LOL - Democrats now want to fire all the VA Supreme Court justices and replace them to get the decision they want.
You can't make this S up.
Everyone keep chanting democrazy.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Jim Clyburn had this right...all of these southern gerrymandered districts assume MAGA is still popular. But if we are really going to see a +13 to the left shift, then the GOP will not hold on to any of them.
But that also requires a lot of work on the ground to register voters and get out the vote.
But if gas is over $5 for a sustained period and diesel is over 7/8, people will be desperate for changes.
And running inconvenient candidates who can win in those districts . People like Joe Manchin who the hard core liberals chose to drive out of the Party rather than accept that West Virginia isn't Alexandria.
Anonymous wrote:Jim Clyburn had this right...all of these southern gerrymandered districts assume MAGA is still popular. But if we are really going to see a +13 to the left shift, then the GOP will not hold on to any of them.
But that also requires a lot of work on the ground to register voters and get out the vote.
But if gas is over $5 for a sustained period and diesel is over 7/8, people will be desperate for changes.
Anonymous wrote:Ok, if they want to play that game the blue states can, too. California can pick up, what, seven?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The California map was also passed in violation of the state Constitution. Virginia's judges went with the Constitution, and California's judges have so far ignored it.
There is a rule that laws have to be presented to the public for 30 days before passage.
Democrats took an existing bill and replaced it with this amendment, claiming that this provision is met by having the public see the number of the bill for 30 days.
The Ohio and Florida constitutions ban partisan gerrymandering. Republicans did it anyway. Tennessee law bans mid-cycle redistricting. Republicans did it anyway.
Tennessee repealed the law prohibiting mid-cycle redistricting. And they redistricted in response to the SCOTUS decision prohibiting districting based on race.
Anonymous wrote:Everyone who is OK iwth what happened in VA and isn't also criticizing the substance and manner in which deep south states (as well as MO, OH, TN) are gerrymandering mid-cycle is a F'ing hypocrite and hack.
F all of you.
I don't think it can be argue this district was made based on race. It is very compact, unlike Louisiana.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The California map was also passed in violation of the state Constitution. Virginia's judges went with the Constitution, and California's judges have so far ignored it.
There is a rule that laws have to be presented to the public for 30 days before passage.
Democrats took an existing bill and replaced it with this amendment, claiming that this provision is met by having the public see the number of the bill for 30 days.
The Ohio and Florida constitutions ban partisan gerrymandering. Republicans did it anyway. Tennessee law bans mid-cycle redistricting. Republicans did it anyway.
Tennessee repealed the law prohibiting mid-cycle redistricting. And they redistricted in response to the SCOTUS decision prohibiting districting based on race.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The California map was also passed in violation of the state Constitution. Virginia's judges went with the Constitution, and California's judges have so far ignored it.
There is a rule that laws have to be presented to the public for 30 days before passage.
Democrats took an existing bill and replaced it with this amendment, claiming that this provision is met by having the public see the number of the bill for 30 days.
The Ohio and Florida constitutions ban partisan gerrymandering. Republicans did it anyway. Tennessee law bans mid-cycle redistricting. Republicans did it anyway.
Anonymous wrote:The virginia supreme court has set a precedent that it is ok to cancel an election after it has taken place.
Anonymous wrote:The California map was also passed in violation of the state Constitution. Virginia's judges went with the Constitution, and California's judges have so far ignored it.
There is a rule that laws have to be presented to the public for 30 days before passage.
Democrats took an existing bill and replaced it with this amendment, claiming that this provision is met by having the public see the number of the bill for 30 days.