Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Yes? Because normal people recognize that Trump and Vance are both weird.
But weird is good, right? We’ve been pre-programmed to respect and recognise outliers and weird creeps for so many years that now weird have a positive connotation.
People understand there is a difference between quirky/harmless kind of odd and creepy weird. The former might stop to smell the roses or wear mismatched socks while the latter locks women up in the basement. Without being explicitly told, we all understand which one Trump/Vance are.
Can you provide the link to when either Trump or Vance locked women in a basement? Otherwise, they are rose-smelling weird.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Yes? Because normal people recognize that Trump and Vance are both weird.
But weird is good, right? We’ve been pre-programmed to respect and recognise outliers and weird creeps for so many years that now weird have a positive connotation.
People understand there is a difference between quirky/harmless kind of odd and creepy weird. The former might stop to smell the roses or wear mismatched socks while the latter locks women up in the basement. Without being explicitly told, we all understand which one Trump/Vance are.
Can you provide the link to when either Trump or Vance locked women in a basement? Otherwise, they are rose-smelling weird.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Yes? Because normal people recognize that Trump and Vance are both weird.
But weird is good, right? We’ve been pre-programmed to respect and recognise outliers and weird creeps for so many years that now weird have a positive connotation.
No, "nerds" and "geeks" have come to have positive connotations. "Weird" is still the kid who always says something awkward/inappropriate and doesn't know how to behave appropriately in social settings.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Yes? Because normal people recognize that Trump and Vance are both weird.
But weird is good, right? We’ve been pre-programmed to respect and recognise outliers and weird creeps for so many years that now weird have a positive connotation.
People understand there is a difference between quirky/harmless kind of odd and creepy weird. The former might stop to smell the roses or wear mismatched socks while the latter locks women up in the basement. Without being explicitly told, we all understand which one Trump/Vance are.
Anonymous wrote:NP. Both parties need to understand how different the online echo chamber is versus the average swing state voter. For the purposes of this discussion, the left-leaning terminally online crowd loves the “weird” narrative. But I don’t think it will resonate as well with the non-terminally online swing state voters, especially coming from some of the unquestionably weird Democrats. I think it’s actually likely to fall a little flat. This is red meat for the already-committed Democrat voters, but that’s not who the Democrats need to reach.
The same is true in reverse for other messaging from the Republicans, but that’s not the subject of this thread.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Yes? Because normal people recognize that Trump and Vance are both weird.
But weird is good, right? We’ve been pre-programmed to respect and recognise outliers and weird creeps for so many years that now weird have a positive connotation.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Yes? Because normal people recognize that Trump and Vance are both weird.
But weird is good, right? We’ve been pre-programmed to respect and recognise outliers and weird creeps for so many years that now weird have a positive connotation.
This isn’t interesting or quirky weird.
The GOP is creepy couch f-ing controlling women’s bodies weird.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Yes? Because normal people recognize that Trump and Vance are both weird.
But weird is good, right? We’ve been pre-programmed to respect and recognise outliers and weird creeps for so many years that now weird have a positive connotation.
Anonymous wrote:NP. Both parties need to understand how different the online echo chamber is versus the average swing state voter. For the purposes of this discussion, the left-leaning terminally online crowd loves the “weird” narrative. But I don’t think it will resonate as well with the non-terminally online swing state voters, especially coming from some of the unquestionably weird Democrats. I think it’s actually likely to fall a little flat. This is red meat for the already-committed Democrat voters, but that’s not who the Democrats need to reach.
The same is true in reverse for other messaging from the Republicans, but that’s not the subject of this thread.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Yes? Because normal people recognize that Trump and Vance are both weird.
But weird is good, right? We’ve been pre-programmed to respect and recognise outliers and weird creeps for so many years that now weird have a positive connotation.