Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
You have this all so backwards. What about the young gentleman who now stands accused of this so-called crime?
Why wasn’t he provided with wrap around services? Why should his life be ruined now too??
I hope this is sarcasm. Hard to tell on this board.
Lol, that it is.
Wrap around services do not compel participation. They are voluntary. A feature of mental illness and addiction for many is to not understand that you have a problem. For a person who shot one father in the head (still hanging on) and killed another father of 2 young girls WHO HAD HANDED OVER HIS KEYS, which voluntary services would have made him Mr. Rogers, PP. Please enlighten us all. And what if he was not mentally ill but just someone who did not value human life? What services for that issue?
The genuflecting to "services" seems to be part of the new religion, despite the lack of grounding in the reality of the human condition. DC spends a staggering sum on "services" without much of a payoff thus far. Of course the NGOs are all feeding at the trough and making sure problems do not improve, as they have in Baltimore.
Those wraparound services are not compelling. If they were, people would jump at the chance to have them. This is a failure of the government to provide the services that people want and need.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Downtown restaurants, or Clydes in Chevy Chase > violence breaks out unexpectedly. Was not always like this. Is NOT like this most places. If violent people were taken out of the community, would be a start.
Why no protests? There were protests for hands up, don't shoot. Why not for the dead this week? Why not for the living who remain?
Anonymous wrote:Downtown restaurants, or Clydes in Chevy Chase > violence breaks out unexpectedly. Was not always like this. Is NOT like this most places. If violent people were taken out of the community, would be a start.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
You have this all so backwards. What about the young gentleman who now stands accused of this so-called crime?
Why wasn’t he provided with wrap around services? Why should his life be ruined now too??
I hope this is sarcasm. Hard to tell on this board.
Lol, that it is.
Wrap around services do not compel participation. They are voluntary. A feature of mental illness and addiction for many is to not understand that you have a problem. For a person who shot one father in the head (still hanging on) and killed another father of 2 young girls WHO HAD HANDED OVER HIS KEYS, which voluntary services would have made him Mr. Rogers, PP. Please enlighten us all. And what if he was not mentally ill but just someone who did not value human life? What services for that issue?
The genuflecting to "services" seems to be part of the new religion, despite the lack of grounding in the reality of the human condition. DC spends a staggering sum on "services" without much of a payoff thus far. Of course the NGOs are all feeding at the trough and making sure problems do not improve, as they have in Baltimore.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Ugh, man assaulted near mall is CRITICAL. Like the man shot in the head picking his wife up from work on K. This city is legit dangerous, any time of day.
People are legit evil. And should be treated as such.
Anonymous wrote:Ugh, man assaulted near mall is CRITICAL. Like the man shot in the head picking his wife up from work on K. This city is legit dangerous, any time of day.
Anonymous wrote:Ugh, man assaulted near mall is CRITICAL. Like the man shot in the head picking his wife up from work on K. This city is legit dangerous, any time of day.
Anonymous wrote:The USAO prosecution rate is not improving
“His office actually charged fewer cases last quarter (October-December 2023) and prosecutions remain significantly below the pre-COVID average,” Joe Friday wrote, adding: “This low prosecution rate is without any known precedent in other major American cities or even DC’s recent past.”
“The fact that prosecutions decreased in Q4 2023 goes against the optimistic narrative that USA Graves spun at his October 2023 press conference,” the anonymous blogger wrote. “While the official narrative boiled down to ‘prosecutions increased because we solved longstanding problems;’ the actual prosecution volumes correspond much more with the media schedule.”
https://washingtoncitypaper.com/article/662602/out-of-ink-the-mysterious-author-of-a-crime-focused-substack-has-upended-d-c-s-crime-debate/
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
You have this all so backwards. What about the young gentleman who now stands accused of this so-called crime?
Why wasn’t he provided with wrap around services? Why should his life be ruined now too??
I hope this is sarcasm. Hard to tell on this board.