Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:To suppress free speech is a double wrong. It violates the rights of the hearer as well as those of the speaker.

Differences of opinion were not suppressed. Disinformation, threats, bullying, hoaxes, and fraud are not protected manners of speech. Learn how to persuade someone with a fact-based argument. Of course, if you could do that you wouldn’t be conservative.

Who decides what disinformation is?

How about NOT some far right incel making conspiracy videos in his mom's basement.
How about NOT some nutjob like Bannon who wants an armed re-do of the J6 insurrection.
How about NOT some guy named Sergei in Moscow telling you Ukraine is the most evil corrupt Nazi nation in existence.
How about NOT some person who barely finished high school who insists they "did their research" on COVID and know more than the experts.
How about NOT some fossil-fuel-industry shill from Heartland who insists climate change is a hoax.

I think you should watch Bannon - that’s not what he’s dishing out

Oh?

Who is Phillip Bump?

A Washington Post reporter.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:To suppress free speech is a double wrong. It violates the rights of the hearer as well as those of the speaker.

Differences of opinion were not suppressed. Disinformation, threats, bullying, hoaxes, and fraud are not protected manners of speech. Learn how to persuade someone with a fact-based argument. Of course, if you could do that you wouldn’t be conservative.

Who decides what disinformation is?

How about NOT some far right incel making conspiracy videos in his mom's basement.
How about NOT some nutjob like Bannon who wants an armed re-do of the J6 insurrection.
How about NOT some guy named Sergei in Moscow telling you Ukraine is the most evil corrupt Nazi nation in existence.
How about NOT some person who barely finished high school who insists they "did their research" on COVID and know more than the experts.
How about NOT some fossil-fuel-industry shill from Heartland who insists climate change is a hoax.

I think you should watch Bannon - that’s not what he’s dishing out

Oh?

That is the most ridiculously slanted article I've ever read.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:To suppress free speech is a double wrong. It violates the rights of the hearer as well as those of the speaker.

Differences of opinion were not suppressed. Disinformation, threats, bullying, hoaxes, and fraud are not protected manners of speech. Learn how to persuade someone with a fact-based argument. Of course, if you could do that you wouldn’t be conservative.

Who decides what disinformation is?

How about NOT some far right incel making conspiracy videos in his mom's basement.
How about NOT some nutjob like Bannon who wants an armed re-do of the J6 insurrection.
How about NOT some guy named Sergei in Moscow telling you Ukraine is the most evil corrupt Nazi nation in existence.
How about NOT some person who barely finished high school who insists they "did their research" on COVID and know more than the experts.
How about NOT some fossil-fuel-industry shill from Heartland who insists climate change is a hoax.

I think you should watch Bannon - that’s not what he’s dishing out

Oh?

Who is Phillip Bump?

Is your Google broken?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:To suppress free speech is a double wrong. It violates the rights of the hearer as well as those of the speaker.

Differences of opinion were not suppressed. Disinformation, threats, bullying, hoaxes, and fraud are not protected manners of speech. Learn how to persuade someone with a fact-based argument. Of course, if you could do that you wouldn’t be conservative.

Who decides what disinformation is?

How about NOT some far right incel making conspiracy videos in his mom's basement.
How about NOT some nutjob like Bannon who wants an armed re-do of the J6 insurrection.
How about NOT some guy named Sergei in Moscow telling you Ukraine is the most evil corrupt Nazi nation in existence.
How about NOT some person who barely finished high school who insists they "did their research" on COVID and know more than the experts.
How about NOT some fossil-fuel-industry shill from Heartland who insists climate change is a hoax.

I think you should watch Bannon - that’s not what he’s dishing out

Oh?

Who is Phillip Bump?

Bari Weiss just finished another installment of The Twitter Files. This one seems to be free of gross misrepresentations or significant errors. But, it is very boring. Essentially, lots of Twitter staff wanted Trump to be banned. A few Twitter staffers opposed banning him. There was also lots of external pressure on Twitter to ban him. Twitter executives could not identify a specific policy violation that could justify banning Trump, but they decided that taken in the aggregate, his tweets violated the spirit of the rules. Once he was banned, Twitter staff was happy and a bunch of world leaders expressed disappointment.

Weiss's view is that Trumps banning was inconsistent and capricious. That is a perfectly justifiable opinion. However, it is fully within Twitter's rights to do.

Very few people are paying attention to this in the real world.

Anonymous wrote:So this is it. Once a week or every other week there will be some new big scandal from Musk. Sounds like Fox News.

People are going to tune him out. Even Trump has reached his limit.

So this is it. Once a week or every other week there will be some new big scandal from Musk. Sounds like Fox News.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:When is Elon going to release the emails on how he is colluding with the communist Chinese government to suppress criticism and protests of China's COVID policies?

I suppose the GOP could add that to the list of matters it will be investigating.

It is very interesting that the GOP's latest hero is so willing to do the bidding of Chinese communists.

Like I said, when the House GOP brings in twitter officials to testify, he could be included.

If you think that's going to happen, I have a bridge to sell you.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:When is Elon going to release the emails on how he is colluding with the communist Chinese government to suppress criticism and protests of China's COVID policies?

I suppose the GOP could add that to the list of matters it will be investigating.

It is very interesting that the GOP's latest hero is so willing to do the bidding of Chinese communists.

Like I said, when the House GOP brings in twitter officials to testify, he could be included.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:When is Elon going to release the emails on how he is colluding with the communist Chinese government to suppress criticism and protests of China's COVID policies?

I suppose the GOP could add that to the list of matters it will be investigating.

It is very interesting that the GOP's latest hero is so willing to do the bidding of Chinese communists.

Anonymous wrote:When is Elon going to release the emails on how he is colluding with the communist Chinese government to suppress criticism and protests of China's COVID policies?

I suppose the GOP could add that to the list of matters it will be investigating.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:To suppress free speech is a double wrong. It violates the rights of the hearer as well as those of the speaker.

Differences of opinion were not suppressed. Disinformation, threats, bullying, hoaxes, and fraud are not protected manners of speech. Learn how to persuade someone with a fact-based argument. Of course, if you could do that you wouldn’t be conservative.

Who decides what disinformation is?

How about NOT some far right incel making conspiracy videos in his mom's basement.
How about NOT some nutjob like Bannon who wants an armed re-do of the J6 insurrection.
How about NOT some guy named Sergei in Moscow telling you Ukraine is the most evil corrupt Nazi nation in existence.
How about NOT some person who barely finished high school who insists they "did their research" on COVID and know more than the experts.
How about NOT some fossil-fuel-industry shill from Heartland who insists climate change is a hoax.

I think you should watch Bannon - that’s not what he’s dishing out

I'm not interested in any of the lies and bloviations that greasy-haired overgrown wart is dishing out.

Then your points are moot

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:To suppress free speech is a double wrong. It violates the rights of the hearer as well as those of the speaker.

Differences of opinion were not suppressed. Disinformation, threats, bullying, hoaxes, and fraud are not protected manners of speech. Learn how to persuade someone with a fact-based argument. Of course, if you could do that you wouldn’t be conservative.

Who decides what disinformation is?

How about NOT some far right incel making conspiracy videos in his mom's basement.
How about NOT some nutjob like Bannon who wants an armed re-do of the J6 insurrection.
How about NOT some guy named Sergei in Moscow telling you Ukraine is the most evil corrupt Nazi nation in existence.
How about NOT some person who barely finished high school who insists they "did their research" on COVID and know more than the experts.
How about NOT some fossil-fuel-industry shill from Heartland who insists climate change is a hoax.

I think you should watch Bannon - that’s not what he’s dishing out

I'm not interested in any of the lies and bloviations that greasy-haired overgrown wart is dishing out.

When is Elon going to release the emails on how he is colluding with the communist Chinese government to suppress criticism and protests of China's COVID policies?