Anonymous wrote:I will add nobody would care but for the obnoxious attitude of parents who left other schools (loudly) thinking they were above it all. Trying something new and progressive!! Look at me! Well, fraud isn’t new. Nor are the profiles of the fools who bought in - superior and full of self. It’s a shame that children are ultimate victims of parents’ ego.

Goes for the leadership as well, including Bisgaard. It was like any good judgement flew out of the window when a few $$$ were offered to them. Have any of those leaders involved actually apologized for being a part of the fraud and sham?

I will add nobody would care but for the obnoxious attitude of parents who left other schools (loudly) thinking they were above it all. Trying something new and progressive!! Look at me! Well, fraud isn’t new. Nor are the profiles of the fools who bought in - superior and full of self. It’s a shame that children are ultimate victims of parents’ ego.

+1

I’d add, people without a firsthand connection who are aghast at all that occurred

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:In the original announcement to the parents the fact that he was at Whittle was omitted. It is great it is on the website so that people can associate such a terrible school with Maret (that is sarcasm, btw)

And the reason he was interim head three times is because he was untouchable, until Maret made the horrible decision to hire him

The original announcement had a link to the website with his resume. There’s no there there.

I am a current Maret parent. In the original email to the school community they left off mention of Whittle when they announced about Bisgaard and everyone noticed it so NICE TRY

Look, this thread is about:
- People who are upset with Whittle
- People who are upset that someone from Whittle is Maret’s new HoS

The enemy of your enemy is your friend. Whittle and people trying to leave Whittle like they were all innocent are the enemy, let’s be clear.

+1

It’s very interesting to me that someone keeps trying (obviously and unsuccessfully) to poor cold water all over this story. It seems pretty clear even to an untrained eye that lots of people are culpable and may end up being named in the coming lawsuits (I think people have 3 years to file consumer protection lawsuits in DC). That’s not even under question.

What astounds me is that anyone thinks it’s acceptable to have no comment on what’s occurred at Whittle. The entire parent committee declined to comment as recently as a couple of weeks ago. Including Bisgaard who has a moral duty to address what happened, particularly if he’d like to be entrusted with leading a proper school.

Looking back through this thread, people said WSS was a mess from the set up onwards.

Give it a rest loser

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:In the original announcement to the parents the fact that he was at Whittle was omitted. It is great it is on the website so that people can associate such a terrible school with Maret (that is sarcasm, btw)

And the reason he was interim head three times is because he was untouchable, until Maret made the horrible decision to hire him

The original announcement had a link to the website with his resume. There’s no there there.

There is so much there there for anyone willing to look. There are facts and there are observations all pretty damning about the Bisgaards and the other families on the parents’ committee, not to mention Whittle and various board members (not all).

I’m not talking about the larger discussion. I’m choosing to stay out of it. I was simply talking about poster saying school intentionally left it off the announcement. They literally said “click the link to learn more about him” or something like that and link had resume with Whittle on it. Still does. Something tells me the PP is not a parent.

And the main letter on the website leaves off any specific mention of Whittle while talking about two other previous positions. That is certainly intentional. Click to see more, sure, but they left off any mention of whittle on the landing page. Because it’s embarrassing.

Oh, totally. Just like if you overlay the fibonacci sequence onto the words in the announcement, reverse it and then read it upside down, it spells out "I am Vecna and I have come to destroy Maret."

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:In the original announcement to the parents the fact that he was at Whittle was omitted. It is great it is on the website so that people can associate such a terrible school with Maret (that is sarcasm, btw)

And the reason he was interim head three times is because he was untouchable, until Maret made the horrible decision to hire him

The original announcement had a link to the website with his resume. There’s no there there.

There is so much there there for anyone willing to look. There are facts and there are observations all pretty damning about the Bisgaards and the other families on the parents’ committee, not to mention Whittle and various board members (not all).

I’m not talking about the larger discussion. I’m choosing to stay out of it. I was simply talking about poster saying school intentionally left it off the announcement. They literally said “click the link to learn more about him” or something like that and link had resume with Whittle on it. Still does. Something tells me the PP is not a parent.

And the main letter on the website leaves off any specific mention of Whittle while talking about two other previous positions. That is certainly intentional. Click to see more, sure, but they left off any mention of whittle on the landing page. Because it’s embarrassing.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:In the original announcement to the parents the fact that he was at Whittle was omitted. It is great it is on the website so that people can associate such a terrible school with Maret (that is sarcasm, btw)

And the reason he was interim head three times is because he was untouchable, until Maret made the horrible decision to hire him

The original announcement had a link to the website with his resume. There’s no there there.

There is so much there there for anyone willing to look. There are facts and there are observations all pretty damning about the Bisgaards and the other families on the parents’ committee, not to mention Whittle and various board members (not all).

I’m not talking about the larger discussion. I’m choosing to stay out of it. I was simply talking about poster saying school intentionally left it off the announcement. They literally said “click the link to learn more about him” or something like that and link had resume with Whittle on it. Still does. Something tells me the PP is not a parent.

Says Mrs Bisgard in an attempt to deflect from the real concern here?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:In the original announcement to the parents the fact that he was at Whittle was omitted. It is great it is on the website so that people can associate such a terrible school with Maret (that is sarcasm, btw)

And the reason he was interim head three times is because he was untouchable, until Maret made the horrible decision to hire him

The original announcement had a link to the website with his resume. There’s no there there.

It’s just another made up conspiracy theory by the folks on here desperate to turn a truly terrible situation into a completely manufactured sideshow about the new HoS.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:In the original announcement to the parents the fact that he was at Whittle was omitted. It is great it is on the website so that people can associate such a terrible school with Maret (that is sarcasm, btw)

And the reason he was interim head three times is because he was untouchable, until Maret made the horrible decision to hire him

The original announcement had a link to the website with his resume. There’s no there there.

There is so much there there for anyone willing to look. There are facts and there are observations all pretty damning about the Bisgaards and the other families on the parents’ committee, not to mention Whittle and various board members (not all).

Anonymous wrote:In the original announcement to the parents the fact that he was at Whittle was omitted. It is great it is on the website so that people can associate such a terrible school with Maret (that is sarcasm, btw)

And the reason he was interim head three times is because he was untouchable, until Maret made the horrible decision to hire him

The original announcement had a link to the website with his resume. There’s no there there.

Anonymous wrote:Hi- former Whittle parent. Anyone here able to receive transcripts from the school? Radio silence for us.

Did you find a school to transfer to? Are you in US? If you are, why don’t you try asking the College Coaches? They were contracted, but later stiffed by Whittle. They might have the contact info for who can provide official transcripts. I assume none of the @whittleschool.org addresses would respond anymore.