Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:College admissions have been unpredictable and sometimes shocking. But Sidwell students have been well prepared to succeed wherever they go. College isn't the end goal. It's just another step. They will all be fine.
This may all be true, but it’s also a distraction in the context of this discussion. This is the kind of nonsense that Mamadou and the school trots out, consistent with its arrogant and dismissive tone towards parents. It is a very convenient way to deflect any scrutiny of the school.
“Shocking” results are not OK just because the kids are well prepared. Saying that they will all be fine in this context suggests that college placement doesn’t matter.
Why is it Sidwell's fault that COVID prompted colleges to go test optional causing a steep decline in acceptance rates everywhere? All they can do is advise families of the landscape, which they did. The kids who were realistic about their options and chose a variety of schools that would make them happy, did fine. I have yet to hear about a senior who had no options.
IMO they did not advise families of the landscape or actually counsel families. “They will all be fine” is their crutch for not doing any meaningful, real advising or advocacy.
They absolutely did. Lauren was very clear from the beginning of junior year how COVID was changing things, how the then current class (2021) had to adjust and how it was very important not to focus on the reach+ schools but rather the targets and safeties. Sorry you didn't get the message. It was pretty clear at the time.
No need for the snarky response. And why are you making assumptions about my kid, who actually got in ED? That was no thanks to the school or its crappy counseling; everything I said above is 100% accurate, and I am pissed for my kid’s friends and classmates.
And I don’t know what you are talking about when you say “Lauren was very clear from the beginning of junior year...” Are you referring to the grade-wide zoom meetings? I attended all of those, and I disagree that any meaningful substantive advice or counseling was shared in those silly PowerPoint-heavy meetings going over checklists. Regardless, the real counseling and advising is supposed to occur in the individual meetings. And in those meetings, based on our experience and discussions with other parents, the counselors absolutely did not provide any real advice or counseling.
Then you weren't paying attention to what she was saying. She was very clear.
Congrats to your kid.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:College admissions have been unpredictable and sometimes shocking. But Sidwell students have been well prepared to succeed wherever they go. College isn't the end goal. It's just another step. They will all be fine.
This may all be true, but it’s also a distraction in the context of this discussion. This is the kind of nonsense that Mamadou and the school trots out, consistent with its arrogant and dismissive tone towards parents. It is a very convenient way to deflect any scrutiny of the school.
“Shocking” results are not OK just because the kids are well prepared. Saying that they will all be fine in this context suggests that college placement doesn’t matter.
Why is it Sidwell's fault that COVID prompted colleges to go test optional causing a steep decline in acceptance rates everywhere? All they can do is advise families of the landscape, which they did. The kids who were realistic about their options and chose a variety of schools that would make them happy, did fine. I have yet to hear about a senior who had no options.
IMO they did not advise families of the landscape or actually counsel families. “They will all be fine” is their crutch for not doing any meaningful, real advising or advocacy.
They absolutely did. Lauren was very clear from the beginning of junior year how COVID was changing things, how the then current class (2021) had to adjust and how it was very important not to focus on the reach+ schools but rather the targets and safeties. Sorry you didn't get the message. It was pretty clear at the time.
Sure, but this puts the burden onto the students entirely, rather than to say how the school will maximize opportunities in this situation.
The burden is on the students. That is who is getting to these places. A high school can't change that. A high school can make a kid into an athletic recruit? A development case? A published author or researcher? A musical virtuoso? Look at who these elite college admit? Great stats from a great high school is not enough.
The great high school education is to prepare the student to excel at the ultimate college destination. It cannot engineer that destination.
DP. I believe what pp was saying is that the school should provide real and meaningful individual counseling advice to students, and the school shouldn’t act as if it has no obligation to help engineer the best outcomes—which a school can still do. Partly by providing good advice, and partly through its advocacy for each student. Sidwell’s CCO appears not to believe it has a responsibility to play such a role. And if it does try, it clearly does not do a very good job at it.
This is what the pps were getting at with the “turbocharged” comments (also not mine). A good CCO can still do much more than just provide information and push paper to make sure deadlines are met. Sidwell’s CCO is not good.
The CCO's CANNOT call colleges and advocate for kids. The colleges can and do call the CCOs to ask about applicants.
The CCO CAN advise kids about realistic lists. They cannot fill out the forms, produce videos or write the essays.
they CAN put your applicant in the best light possible with their official school letter of recommendation.
I am not sure what else you think the CCO is supposed to do.
Whats the CCO supposed to do?
See Dalton School (NY) outcomes (scroll to bottom of page): https://www.dalton.org/programs/high-school/college-counseling
Approximately 40 percent into HYPS + MIT. 40 percent!
It gets to 60 percent when you add top LACs and other major schools like Duke, NorthWestern and JHU..
That's what a CCO is supposed to do.
Note: SAT/ACT scores are identical for both schools.
Anonymous wrote:Except colleges no longer want kids from "elite" private schools. There is no advantage and it can actually hurt.
At this point all you can expect from your CCO office is that they offer useful info in selecting colleges, write a coherent letter and keep students on track in the application process. Colleges don't want them to call and advocate on behalf of a student anymore.
Anonymous wrote:Your logic is that is the identical students had attended Dalton instead of sidwell, the college list would be identical. That is not sound logic.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Except colleges no longer want kids from "elite" private schools. There is no advantage and it can actually hurt.
At this point all you can expect from your CCO office is that they offer useful info in selecting colleges, write a coherent letter and keep students on track in the application process. Colleges don't want them to call and advocate on behalf of a student anymore.
CCO writes the school profile. CCO writes the school letter for each student. CCO does develop relationships with admissions officers and can advocate for the school and its general excellence, without talking about any specific student. These are all things that a good CCO can do strategically that can help each and every student, depending on how the office approaches this role.
The Sidwell CCO - the Director and the staff, all do this.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:College admissions have been unpredictable and sometimes shocking. But Sidwell students have been well prepared to succeed wherever they go. College isn't the end goal. It's just another step. They will all be fine.
This may all be true, but it’s also a distraction in the context of this discussion. This is the kind of nonsense that Mamadou and the school trots out, consistent with its arrogant and dismissive tone towards parents. It is a very convenient way to deflect any scrutiny of the school.
“Shocking” results are not OK just because the kids are well prepared. Saying that they will all be fine in this context suggests that college placement doesn’t matter.
Why is it Sidwell's fault that COVID prompted colleges to go test optional causing a steep decline in acceptance rates everywhere? All they can do is advise families of the landscape, which they did. The kids who were realistic about their options and chose a variety of schools that would make them happy, did fine. I have yet to hear about a senior who had no options.
Sidwell senior parent here. Completely agree with what you said. I was in every zoom meeting. Also the Lauren sent all the outside contract seminars , and received all Ads after listening to the seminars.
IMO they did not advise families of the landscape or actually counsel families. “They will all be fine” is their crutch for not doing any meaningful, real advising or advocacy.
They absolutely did. Lauren was very clear from the beginning of junior year how COVID was changing things, how the then current class (2021) had to adjust and how it was very important not to focus on the reach+ schools but rather the targets and safeties. Sorry you didn't get the message. It was pretty clear at the time.
No need for the snarky response. And why are you making assumptions about my kid, who actually got in ED? That was no thanks to the school or its crappy counseling; everything I said above is 100% accurate, and I am pissed for my kid’s friends and classmates.
And I don’t know what you are talking about when you say “Lauren was very clear from the beginning of junior year...” Are you referring to the grade-wide zoom meetings? I attended all of those, and I disagree that any meaningful substantive advice or counseling was shared in those silly PowerPoint-heavy meetings going over checklists. Regardless, the real counseling and advising is supposed to occur in the individual meetings. And in those meetings, based on our experience and discussions with other parents, the counselors absolutely did not provide any real advice or counseling.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:College admissions have been unpredictable and sometimes shocking. But Sidwell students have been well prepared to succeed wherever they go. College isn't the end goal. It's just another step. They will all be fine.
This may all be true, but it’s also a distraction in the context of this discussion. This is the kind of nonsense that Mamadou and the school trots out, consistent with its arrogant and dismissive tone towards parents. It is a very convenient way to deflect any scrutiny of the school.
“Shocking” results are not OK just because the kids are well prepared. Saying that they will all be fine in this context suggests that college placement doesn’t matter.
Why is it Sidwell's fault that COVID prompted colleges to go test optional causing a steep decline in acceptance rates everywhere? All they can do is advise families of the landscape, which they did. The kids who were realistic about their options and chose a variety of schools that would make them happy, did fine. I have yet to hear about a senior who had no options.
IMO they did not advise families of the landscape or actually counsel families. “They will all be fine” is their crutch for not doing any meaningful, real advising or advocacy.
They absolutely did. Lauren was very clear from the beginning of junior year how COVID was changing things, how the then current class (2021) had to adjust and how it was very important not to focus on the reach+ schools but rather the targets and safeties. Sorry you didn't get the message. It was pretty clear at the time.
Sure, but this puts the burden onto the students entirely, rather than to say how the school will maximize opportunities in this situation.
The burden is on the students. That is who is getting to these places. A high school can't change that. A high school can make a kid into an athletic recruit? A development case? A published author or researcher? A musical virtuoso? Look at who these elite college admit? Great stats from a great high school is not enough.
The great high school education is to prepare the student to excel at the ultimate college destination. It cannot engineer that destination.
DP. I believe what pp was saying is that the school should provide real and meaningful individual counseling advice to students, and the school shouldn’t act as if it has no obligation to help engineer the best outcomes—which a school can still do. Partly by providing good advice, and partly through its advocacy for each student. Sidwell’s CCO appears not to believe it has a responsibility to play such a role. And if it does try, it clearly does not do a very good job at it.
This is what the pps were getting at with the “turbocharged” comments (also not mine). A good CCO can still do much more than just provide information and push paper to make sure deadlines are met. Sidwell’s CCO is not good.
The CCO's CANNOT call colleges and advocate for kids. The colleges can and do call the CCOs to ask about applicants.
The CCO CAN advise kids about realistic lists. They cannot fill out the forms, produce videos or write the essays.
they CAN put your applicant in the best light possible with their official school letter of recommendation.
I am not sure what else you think the CCO is supposed to do.
Whats the CCO supposed to do?
See Dalton School (NY) outcomes (scroll to bottom of page): https://www.dalton.org/programs/high-school/college-counseling
Approximately 40 percent into HYPS + MIT. 40 percent!
It gets to 60 percent when you add top LACs and other major schools like Duke, NorthWestern and JHU..
That's what a CCO is supposed to do.
Note: SAT/ACT scores are identical for both schools.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:College admissions have been unpredictable and sometimes shocking. But Sidwell students have been well prepared to succeed wherever they go. College isn't the end goal. It's just another step. They will all be fine.
This may all be true, but it’s also a distraction in the context of this discussion. This is the kind of nonsense that Mamadou and the school trots out, consistent with its arrogant and dismissive tone towards parents. It is a very convenient way to deflect any scrutiny of the school.
“Shocking” results are not OK just because the kids are well prepared. Saying that they will all be fine in this context suggests that college placement doesn’t matter.
Why is it Sidwell's fault that COVID prompted colleges to go test optional causing a steep decline in acceptance rates everywhere? All they can do is advise families of the landscape, which they did. The kids who were realistic about their options and chose a variety of schools that would make them happy, did fine. I have yet to hear about a senior who had no options.
IMO they did not advise families of the landscape or actually counsel families. “They will all be fine” is their crutch for not doing any meaningful, real advising or advocacy.
They absolutely did. Lauren was very clear from the beginning of junior year how COVID was changing things, how the then current class (2021) had to adjust and how it was very important not to focus on the reach+ schools but rather the targets and safeties. Sorry you didn't get the message. It was pretty clear at the time.
Sure, but this puts the burden onto the students entirely, rather than to say how the school will maximize opportunities in this situation.
The burden is on the students. That is who is getting to these places. A high school can't change that. A high school can make a kid into an athletic recruit? A development case? A published author or researcher? A musical virtuoso? Look at who these elite college admit? Great stats from a great high school is not enough.
The great high school education is to prepare the student to excel at the ultimate college destination. It cannot engineer that destination.
DP. I believe what pp was saying is that the school should provide real and meaningful individual counseling advice to students, and the school shouldn’t act as if it has no obligation to help engineer the best outcomes—which a school can still do. Partly by providing good advice, and partly through its advocacy for each student. Sidwell’s CCO appears not to believe it has a responsibility to play such a role. And if it does try, it clearly does not do a very good job at it.
This is what the pps were getting at with the “turbocharged” comments (also not mine). A good CCO can still do much more than just provide information and push paper to make sure deadlines are met. Sidwell’s CCO is not good.
The CCO's CANNOT call colleges and advocate for kids. The colleges can and do call the CCOs to ask about applicants.
The CCO CAN advise kids about realistic lists. They cannot fill out the forms, produce videos or write the essays.
they CAN put your applicant in the best light possible with their official school letter of recommendation.
I am not sure what else you think the CCO is supposed to do.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Except colleges no longer want kids from "elite" private schools. There is no advantage and it can actually hurt.
At this point all you can expect from your CCO office is that they offer useful info in selecting colleges, write a coherent letter and keep students on track in the application process. Colleges don't want them to call and advocate on behalf of a student anymore.
CCO writes the school profile. CCO writes the school letter for each student. CCO does develop relationships with admissions officers and can advocate for the school and its general excellence, without talking about any specific student. These are all things that a good CCO can do strategically that can help each and every student, depending on how the office approaches this role.
Anonymous wrote:Except colleges no longer want kids from "elite" private schools. There is no advantage and it can actually hurt.
At this point all you can expect from your CCO office is that they offer useful info in selecting colleges, write a coherent letter and keep students on track in the application process. Colleges don't want them to call and advocate on behalf of a student anymore.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Inside goss easy that this has been a pretty rough year at Sidwell. Some of the "best" students don't have strong options.
Disagree.
What do you consider options that are not strong?
Bumping this bc I think all of this is perspective. I know a Sidwell kid who was disappointed with their “safety,” which was a top 30 school with less than 10% admit rate. That kid has luckily shifted gears and now sees this is a great choice but to listen to parents this is the kind of “bloodbath” they are referencing.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I am confused. Sidwell kids seem to have great choices so far based on the Instagram account, which admittedly doesn’t have a lot of data yet. Are the kids who have not yet posted shut out of all their targets? For those posters who are angry, what outcome would allow you to say that it was a successful year?
Obviously their student was rejected by a top desired school and they are struggling with anger over the rejection.
With due respect, not so interested in speculation but rather from posters with direct knowledge of the situation.
Fair enough but there are lots of upset parents dealing with college rejections at this time of year. I know plenty.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:College admissions have been unpredictable and sometimes shocking. But Sidwell students have been well prepared to succeed wherever they go. College isn't the end goal. It's just another step. They will all be fine.
This may all be true, but it’s also a distraction in the context of this discussion. This is the kind of nonsense that Mamadou and the school trots out, consistent with its arrogant and dismissive tone towards parents. It is a very convenient way to deflect any scrutiny of the school.
“Shocking” results are not OK just because the kids are well prepared. Saying that they will all be fine in this context suggests that college placement doesn’t matter.
Why is it Sidwell's fault that COVID prompted colleges to go test optional causing a steep decline in acceptance rates everywhere? All they can do is advise families of the landscape, which they did. The kids who were realistic about their options and chose a variety of schools that would make them happy, did fine. I have yet to hear about a senior who had no options.
IMO they did not advise families of the landscape or actually counsel families. “They will all be fine” is their crutch for not doing any meaningful, real advising or advocacy.
They absolutely did. Lauren was very clear from the beginning of junior year how COVID was changing things, how the then current class (2021) had to adjust and how it was very important not to focus on the reach+ schools but rather the targets and safeties. Sorry you didn't get the message. It was pretty clear at the time.
Sure, but this puts the burden onto the students entirely, rather than to say how the school will maximize opportunities in this situation.
The burden is on the students. That is who is getting to these places. A high school can't change that. A high school can make a kid into an athletic recruit? A development case? A published author or researcher? A musical virtuoso? Look at who these elite college admit? Great stats from a great high school is not enough.
The great high school education is to prepare the student to excel at the ultimate college destination. It cannot engineer that destination.
DP. I believe what pp was saying is that the school should provide real and meaningful individual counseling advice to students, and the school shouldn’t act as if it has no obligation to help engineer the best outcomes—which a school can still do. Partly by providing good advice, and partly through its advocacy for each student. Sidwell’s CCO appears not to believe it has a responsibility to play such a role. And if it does try, it clearly does not do a very good job at it.
This is what the pps were getting at with the “turbocharged” comments (also not mine). A good CCO can still do much more than just provide information and push paper to make sure deadlines are met. Sidwell’s CCO is not good.