Anonymous
11/15/2025 15:52
Subject: Re:Epstein Files
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
There is a difference between 8 yr olds and 15 yr olds.
8 yr olds have neither developed bodies nor developed brains.
15 yr olds have developed bodies but *not* developed brains. This inconsistency creates a lot of risks, which is why the law still protects these teenagers!
Despite being an adult, Megyn Kelly has a developed body but not yet a developed brain.
🎯 A 50-something guy can find a 15-year-old hot. This is already super-obvious, and it's not the stunning revelation gross pp/former prosecutor thinks it is.
But that 15-year-old (or even 17-year-old, which Virginia Giuffre was) does not have the mental or emotional maturity to weigh "wow, this billionaire/Prince Andrew likes my body" against "wow, this billionaire/Prince Andrew just wants a trafficked sex slave they can use and discard."
We need to keep protecting young teen girls and prosecuting their traffickers. Enough with inventing grand classifications ("epobophilia") to rationalize trafficking immature teens.
Nobody rationalized trafficking teens, the former sex crimes prosecutor spoke strongly against that in fact.
They merely pointed out that it is not pedophilia to be attracted to sexually mature teenaged bodies, as fact you and others have conceded.
Some of the people posting here are just plain childish. Perhaps none of them should be having sex with anyone.
Sorry, but no way. That former prosecutor only looks at the male perspective. "I can certainly see a beautiful young sexual mature body and see the appeal. And I know it’s not sickness for other adults to feel the same." Then the former prosecutor says she doesn't get it... but only because she's a sapiosexual and for her it's not just about physicality--but as this quote shows, she accepts that some men are all about the physicality.
Again, the girls' POV is completely ignored. They're being groomed and trafficked, and they're too immature psychologically to understand what's happening to them. But it's OK because it's normal for me to like young girls? Again, GMAFB.
She never, ever said that. Not even a little bit.
She said pedophilia is a specific paraphilia set forth in the DSM which is defined by a primary sexual attraction to VERY young children, children who exhibit ZERO sexual maturity.
The attraction of adult men and adult women to sexually mature teenaged bodies is not a mental disorder of any kind whatsoever.
Acting on that attraction is an entirely different thing, and she spoke strongly against trafficking which she has prosecuted for pity’s sake.
You can stamp your feet and get red in the face all you want, but it doesn’t change biology or psychology or the law.
Finis.
That is exactly what she said. Go back and read. She posted a very long defense of age gaps, citing her own made-up historical data and Celine Dion as examples. Coming from a former prosecutor, it’s unsettling to read “yeah, trafficking is bad and older creeps are gross, but also I think they have a valid point”.
If teenagers are sexually mature enough for adult men to pair up with, then why are they not treated as adults in any other way? Why aren’t they allowed to vote, carry arms, or buy liquor? And on a related note, why are 30 year old Republican males referred to as “kids” the moment they do anything wrong?
We seem to be dealing with Schrodinger’s Adult here.
+1 That post was whack
+2. The supposed "child trafficking prosecutor" is just parroting whack MAGA talking points. See: Megyn Kelly for similar talking points.
Strongly suspect that pp is doing what MAGA always does here: pretend to be someone with liberal creds on an issue, while parroting MAGA tps. Usually it's "I'm a dem but I really hate Biden and DEI" or whatever. In this case it's "I'm a former child trafficking prosecutor who thinks it's normal for adult men to like tweens, and here's five paras why."
Anonymous
11/15/2025 15:49
Subject: Re:Epstein Files
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Any mention of Clinton?
Yes. The quote was “Clinton was NEVER EVER there, never,” Epstein wrote."
Anonymous
11/15/2025 15:37
Subject: Re:Epstein Files
Anonymous wrote:
Any mention of Clinton?
Anonymous
11/15/2025 15:27
Subject: Re:Epstein Files
Anonymous wrote:
Not a Trump supporter, but frequency needs to take into account unique mentions, quoted email responses, and public and private references. Maybe the governor has a member of his staff who can help him with this.
Anonymous
11/15/2025 15:15
Subject: Epstein Files
Anonymous
11/15/2025 15:11
Subject: Epstein Files
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:BREAKING
Trump direct justice department to look into Epstein’s ties to Democrats.
https://x.com/nytimes/status/1989422227658313845?s=46
I literally laughed out loud. He’s so stupid.
Didn’t Bondi and her team go through all the files and say there was nothing there. No list, etc. Trump is spinning so far out of control over this.
Didn’t Bondi declare back in the summer there were no files? Or maybe I am not recalling correctly.
In my defense, it’s hard to keep up with their lies.
Trump promised on campaign to release them and when bonds wore in she said it was top priority, they are on my desk right now!! She clearly hadn’t seen them. She had been misled.
then radio silence.
Then many people assigned to redacting and removing any mention of trump with sharpies, so much so that sharpies were scarce and they ran out. When reporters asked bondi at this time about files, she just stopped talking and left. She knew. It was bad.
Thank you.
Anonymous
11/15/2025 14:28
Subject: Epstein Files
LMAO why, Ben? You do know why, don't you? Because you also think Trump's implicated and you just don't like MTG saying it out loud.
Anonymous
11/15/2025 14:16
Subject: Re:Epstein Files
Republicans now desperately moving the goalposts like "well ackshually it's not pedophilia because the victims were older than 5 years old" - some of them were 13, FFS. They were CHILDREN! And, they were trafficked, taken advantage of, and sexually assaulted by rich, powerful men!
Anonymous
11/15/2025 13:53
Subject: Epstein Files
Anonymous
Anonymous
11/15/2025 09:53
Subject: Epstein Files
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:One thing I fear is that, all the Trump going down on Bubba and spending hours alone with the 9th graders is going to distract us from the multimillion dollar tax fraud Trump committed.
Trump bought a property for $40m, listed it for $125m, and sold it for $100m. Anybody want to bet on whether he claimed a $60m profit or a $25m loss on his taxes?
Beyond that is the issue of the $100 million sale price itself. Epstein’s email said no one was buying the property at the original price. But Trump magically found a Russian buyer willing to give him more than 2x the original overpriced list price. Any claim of tax loss is just the cherry on top of the tens of millions in (alleged) gift money.
The Russian buyer was in the midst of an ugly divorce and playing their own asset hiding money laundering game. The property was later subdivided into three parcels at $40m each.
Anonymous
11/15/2025 09:42
Subject: Re:Epstein Files
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
There is a difference between 8 yr olds and 15 yr olds.
8 yr olds have neither developed bodies nor developed brains.
15 yr olds have developed bodies but *not* developed brains. This inconsistency creates a lot of risks, which is why the law still protects these teenagers!
Despite being an adult, Megyn Kelly has a developed body but not yet a developed brain.
🎯 A 50-something guy can find a 15-year-old hot. This is already super-obvious, and it's not the stunning revelation gross pp/former prosecutor thinks it is.
But that 15-year-old (or even 17-year-old, which Virginia Giuffre was) does not have the mental or emotional maturity to weigh "wow, this billionaire/Prince Andrew likes my body" against "wow, this billionaire/Prince Andrew just wants a trafficked sex slave they can use and discard."
We need to keep protecting young teen girls and prosecuting their traffickers. Enough with inventing grand classifications ("epobophilia") to rationalize trafficking immature teens.
Nobody rationalized trafficking teens, the former sex crimes prosecutor spoke strongly against that in fact.
They merely pointed out that it is not pedophilia to be attracted to sexually mature teenaged bodies, as fact you and others have conceded.
Some of the people posting here are just plain childish. Perhaps none of them should be having sex with anyone.
Sorry, but no way. That former prosecutor only looks at the male perspective. "I can certainly see a beautiful young sexual mature body and see the appeal. And I know it’s not sickness for other adults to feel the same." Then the former prosecutor says she doesn't get it... but only because she's a sapiosexual and for her it's not just about physicality--but as this quote shows, she accepts that some men are all about the physicality.
Again, the girls' POV is completely ignored. They're being groomed and trafficked, and they're too immature psychologically to understand what's happening to them. But it's OK because it's normal for me to like young girls? Again, GMAFB.
She never, ever said that. Not even a little bit.
She said pedophilia is a specific paraphilia set forth in the DSM which is defined by a primary sexual attraction to VERY young children, children who exhibit ZERO sexual maturity.
The attraction of adult men and adult women to sexually mature teenaged bodies is not a mental disorder of any kind whatsoever.
Acting on that attraction is an entirely different thing, and she spoke strongly against trafficking which she has prosecuted for pity’s sake.
You can stamp your feet and get red in the face all you want, but it doesn’t change biology or psychology or the law.
Finis.
That is exactly what she said. Go back and read. She posted a very long defense of age gaps, citing her own made-up historical data and Celine Dion as examples. Coming from a former prosecutor, it’s unsettling to read “yeah, trafficking is bad and older creeps are gross, but also I think they have a valid point”.
If teenagers are sexually mature enough for adult men to pair up with, then why are they not treated as adults in any other way? Why aren’t they allowed to vote, carry arms, or buy liquor? And on a related note, why are 30 year old Republican males referred to as “kids” the moment they do anything wrong?
We seem to be dealing with Schrodinger’s Adult here.
+1 That post was whack
Anonymous
11/15/2025 09:39
Subject: Re:Epstein Files
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
I'm just over here wondering when Trump is going to have a stroke from the stress of all of this.
Washington DC Probs shared info that music is blasting from the White House.
“Uptown Girl” and “The Phantom of the Opera” were heard.
Is someone trying to calm him down?
I’m loving all this for him.
Anonymous
11/15/2025 09:01
Subject: Epstein Files
And Congress needs to vote so that we get the REST of the files, and can crosswalk between what Bondi and the FBI likely redacted to hide the references to Trump.
Anonymous
11/15/2025 09:00
Subject: Re:Epstein Files
