Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Ok.
Say catfish theory is out. CB did invite JR over. He still stabbed her and they both killed JR.
You think JM made all that up? You think JM knew exactly words and timing of when messages were sent by “Christine” if JM wasn’t the one writing them? No.
Calm down. I’m not defending her.
I’m saying that the defense attorney keeps saying that it wasn’t catfish. Even if it wasn’t, they still killed CB and JR so it doesn’t matter.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Ok.
Say catfish theory is out. CB did invite JR over. He still stabbed her and they both killed JR.
What evidence is there that BB stabbed her?
1. Witness testimony
2. Blood spatter pattern on his shoes
Circumstantial evidence - the timing of the 911 calls (ie, if Joe had stabbed her, he would’ve had to have done it before the first call - since by the time that fist call was placed, he was actively dying. If CB had been stabbed before the first call, the Au pair would’ve said so to the operator and stayed on the line. Instead she hung up because her boyfriend BB hadn’t stabbed CB yet.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Ok.
Say catfish theory is out. CB did invite JR over. He still stabbed her and they both killed JR.
What evidence is there that BB stabbed her?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Ok.
Say catfish theory is out. CB did invite JR over. He still stabbed her and they both killed JR.
You think JM made all that up? You think JM knew exactly words and timing of when messages were sent by “Christine” if JM wasn’t the one writing them? No.
Anonymous wrote:Ok.
Say catfish theory is out. CB did invite JR over. He still stabbed her and they both killed JR.
Anonymous wrote:Ok.
Say catfish theory is out. CB did invite JR over. He still stabbed her and they both killed JR.