Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

CPS should investigate Megyn Kelly. Are her children being molested?

There is a difference between 8 yr olds and 15 yr olds.

8 yr olds have neither developed bodies nor developed brains.

15 yr olds have developed bodies but *not* developed brains. This inconsistency creates a lot of risks, which is why the law still protects these teenagers!

Despite being an adult, Megyn Kelly has a developed body but not yet a developed brain.

🎯 A 50-something guy can find a 15-year-old hot. This is already super-obvious, and it's not the stunning revelation gross pp/former prosecutor thinks it is.

But that 15-year-old (or even 17-year-old, which Virginia Giuffre was) does not have the mental or emotional maturity to weigh "wow, this billionaire/Prince Andrew likes my body" against "wow, this billionaire/Prince Andrew just wants a trafficked sex slave they can use and discard."

We need to keep protecting young teen girls and prosecuting their traffickers. Enough with inventing grand classifications ("epobophilia") to rationalize trafficking immature teens.

Nobody rationalized trafficking teens, the former sex crimes prosecutor spoke strongly against that in fact.

They merely pointed out that it is not pedophilia to be attracted to sexually mature teenaged bodies, as fact you and others have conceded.

Some of the people posting here are just plain childish. Perhaps none of them should be having sex with anyone.

Sorry, but no way. That former prosecutor only looks at the male perspective. "I can certainly see a beautiful young sexual mature body and see the appeal. And I know it’s not sickness for other adults to feel the same." Then the former prosecutor says she doesn't get it... but only because she's a sapiosexual and for her it's not just about physicality--but as this quote shows, she accepts that some men are all about the physicality.

Again, the girls' POV is completely ignored. They're being groomed and trafficked, and they're too immature psychologically to understand what's happening to them. But it's OK because it's normal for me to like young girls? Again, GMAFB.

She never, ever said that. Not even a little bit.

She said pedophilia is a specific paraphilia set forth in the DSM which is defined by a primary sexual attraction to VERY young children, children who exhibit ZERO sexual maturity.

The attraction of adult men and adult women to sexually mature teenaged bodies is not a mental disorder of any kind whatsoever.

Acting on that attraction is an entirely different thing, and she spoke strongly against trafficking which she has prosecuted for pity’s sake.

You can stamp your feet and get red in the face all you want, but it doesn’t change biology or psychology or the law.

Finis.

That is exactly what she said. Go back and read. She posted a very long defense of age gaps, citing her own made-up historical data and Celine Dion as examples. Coming from a former prosecutor, it’s unsettling to read “yeah, trafficking is bad and older creeps are gross, but also I think they have a valid point”.

If teenagers are sexually mature enough for adult men to pair up with, then why are they not treated as adults in any other way? Why aren’t they allowed to vote, carry arms, or buy liquor? And on a related note, why are 30 year old Republican males referred to as “kids” the moment they do anything wrong?

We seem to be dealing with Schrodinger’s Adult here.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

CPS should investigate Megyn Kelly. Are her children being molested?

There is a difference between 8 yr olds and 15 yr olds.

8 yr olds have neither developed bodies nor developed brains.

15 yr olds have developed bodies but *not* developed brains. This inconsistency creates a lot of risks, which is why the law still protects these teenagers!

Despite being an adult, Megyn Kelly has a developed body but not yet a developed brain.

🎯 A 50-something guy can find a 15-year-old hot. This is already super-obvious, and it's not the stunning revelation gross pp/former prosecutor thinks it is.

But that 15-year-old (or even 17-year-old, which Virginia Giuffre was) does not have the mental or emotional maturity to weigh "wow, this billionaire/Prince Andrew likes my body" against "wow, this billionaire/Prince Andrew just wants a trafficked sex slave they can use and discard."

We need to keep protecting young teen girls and prosecuting their traffickers. Enough with inventing grand classifications ("epobophilia") to rationalize trafficking immature teens.

Nobody rationalized trafficking teens, the former sex crimes prosecutor spoke strongly against that in fact.

They merely pointed out that it is not pedophilia to be attracted to sexually mature teenaged bodies, as fact you and others have conceded.

Some of the people posting here are just plain childish. Perhaps none of them should be having sex with anyone.

Sorry, but no way. That former prosecutor only looks at the male perspective. "I can certainly see a beautiful young sexual mature body and see the appeal. And I know it’s not sickness for other adults to feel the same." Then the former prosecutor says she doesn't get it... but only because she's a sapiosexual and for her it's not just about physicality--but as this quote shows, she accepts that some men are all about the physicality.

Again, the girls' POV is completely ignored. They're being groomed and trafficked, and they're too immature psychologically to understand what's happening to them. But it's OK because it's normal for me to like young girls? Again, GMAFB.

She never, ever said that. Not even a little bit.

She said pedophilia is a specific paraphilia set forth in the DSM which is defined by a primary sexual attraction to VERY young children, children who exhibit ZERO sexual maturity.

The attraction of adult men and adult women to sexually mature teenaged bodies is not a mental disorder of any kind whatsoever.

Acting on that attraction is an entirely different thing, and she spoke strongly against trafficking which she has prosecuted for pity’s sake.

You can stamp your feet and get red in the face all you want, but it doesn’t change biology or psychology or the law.

Finis.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:BREAKING

Trump direct justice department to look into Epstein’s ties to Democrats.

https://x.com/nytimes/status/1989422227658313845?s=46

I literally laughed out loud. He’s so stupid.

Didn’t Bondi and her team go through all the files and say there was nothing there. No list, etc. Trump is spinning so far out of control over this.

Didn’t Bondi declare back in the summer there were no files? Or maybe I am not recalling correctly.

In my defense, it’s hard to keep up with their lies.

Anonymous wrote:One thing I fear is that, all the Trump going down on Bubba and spending hours alone with the 9th graders is going to distract us from the multimillion dollar tax fraud Trump committed.

Trump bought a property for $40m, listed it for $125m, and sold it for $100m. Anybody want to bet on whether he claimed a $60m profit or a $25m loss on his taxes?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:BREAKING

Trump direct justice department to look into Epstein’s ties to Democrats.

https://x.com/nytimes/status/1989422227658313845?s=46

I literally laughed out loud. He’s so stupid.

But what if this gives the DOJ an excuse not to release any files because they are now part of an active investigation?

Anonymous wrote:
I'm just over here wondering when Trump is going to have a stroke from the stress of all of this.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:lol

I saw something about this earlier. From where did this story about a bl**jo* originate?

The Epstein emails released by the House oversight committee yesterday and owned by the Epstein estate.

Thanks. I just haven’t seen anything about the particular email.

It in the other Epstein thread (very South Park but appears to be real):
https://www.dcurbanmom.com/jforum/posts/list/510/1301133.page#31145812

Anonymous wrote:
I'm just over here wondering when Trump is going to have a stroke from the stress of all of this.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
I'm just over here wondering when Trump is going to have a stroke from the stress of all of this.

In the next short period of time.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:lol

I saw something about this earlier. From where did this story about a bl**jo* originate?

The Epstein emails released by the House oversight committee yesterday and owned by the Epstein estate.

Thanks. I just haven’t seen anything about the particular email.

Anonymous wrote:
I'm just over here wondering when Trump is going to have a stroke from the stress of all of this.