Anonymous wrote:He is part of the Gang of 8. He knows what is coming. Strap in.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This committee is unconstitutional due to the following:
The Select Committee, however, is not an authorized congressional committee because it fails to comport with its own authorizing resolution, House Resolution 503. Congress’ failure to act in accordance with its own rules is judicially cognizable. Yellin v. United States, 374 U.S. 109, 114 (1963). This is particularly significant where a person’s fundamental rights are involved
sure, that's why McConnell is saying the committee should investigate.![]()
![]()
Why haven't they raised this as an issue if it was real?
Are you smarter than all the Rs in Congress ? Or are the rest of the Rs just dumb?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This committee is unconstitutional due to the following:
The Select Committee, however, is not an authorized congressional committee because it fails to comport with its own authorizing resolution, House Resolution 503. Congress’ failure to act in accordance with its own rules is judicially cognizable. Yellin v. United States, 374 U.S. 109, 114 (1963). This is particularly significant where a person’s fundamental rights are involved
LOL, no, they are within the rules. Stop listening to =right wing crap. They give you bad information and then you look stupid repeating it.
(hint, a few have tried to challenge on this argument in court and none of the judges have bought it)
Anonymous wrote:This committee is unconstitutional due to the following:
The Select Committee, however, is not an authorized congressional committee because it fails to comport with its own authorizing resolution, House Resolution 503. Congress’ failure to act in accordance with its own rules is judicially cognizable. Yellin v. United States, 374 U.S. 109, 114 (1963). This is particularly significant where a person’s fundamental rights are involved
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Where are the serious people at DOJ?
Time to replace Garland with someone with the stones to do the job. He needs to retire from public service.
If you think the DOJ isn't working through this as efficiently and quickly as it can, I don't know what to tell you. Stop buying the "Garland isn't doing anything" BS - it undermines what is really happening, which is quite a lot, if you are paying attention.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This committee is unconstitutional due to the following:
The Select Committee, however, is not an authorized congressional committee because it fails to comport with its own authorizing resolution, House Resolution 503. Congress’ failure to act in accordance with its own rules is judicially cognizable. Yellin v. United States, 374 U.S. 109, 114 (1963). This is particularly significant where a person’s fundamental rights are involved
Again, House Resolution 503 called for Pelosi to nominate Republicans after consultation with the minority leader. “Consultation” doesn't mean “agreement” or “approval.” It just means Pelosi had to discuss it with McCarthy, which she did. And there are Republicans on the committee. Fewer than called for by the resolution, but the committee is also smaller than the resolution called for and the ratio of Democrats to Republicans is similar. Get a better argument.
Anonymous wrote:This committee is unconstitutional due to the following:
The Select Committee, however, is not an authorized congressional committee because it fails to comport with its own authorizing resolution, House Resolution 503. Congress’ failure to act in accordance with its own rules is judicially cognizable. Yellin v. United States, 374 U.S. 109, 114 (1963). This is particularly significant where a person’s fundamental rights are involved
Anonymous wrote:This committee is unconstitutional due to the following:
The Select Committee, however, is not an authorized congressional committee because it fails to comport with its own authorizing resolution, House Resolution 503. Congress’ failure to act in accordance with its own rules is judicially cognizable. Yellin v. United States, 374 U.S. 109, 114 (1963). This is particularly significant where a person’s fundamental rights are involved
The Select Committee, however, is not an authorized congressional committee because it fails to comport with its own authorizing resolution, House Resolution 503. Congress’ failure to act in accordance with its own rules is judicially cognizable. Yellin v. United States, 374 U.S. 109, 114 (1963). This is particularly significant where a person’s fundamental rights are involved
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Where are the serious people at DOJ?
Time to replace Garland with someone with the stones to do the job. He needs to retire from public service.
If you think the DOJ isn't working through this as efficiently and quickly as it can, I don't know what to tell you. Stop buying the "Garland isn't doing anything" BS - it undermines what is really happening, which is quite a lot, if you are paying attention.
Yeah. He’ll get to it after they indict Gaetz. Too many investigations are piling up with no action by the DOJ.