Anonymous wrote:Links do not have to go to other sites, so having a link to VDOE is not proof that the screenshot is not from DOW.
Besides, where do they claim it is from VDOE?
I assumed the arrow was yours, but it is on the original tweet. I doubt the poster thought VDOE was putting giant arrows on their site.
Also, the content was accurate at the time it was posted.
Anonymous wrote:Most of the Loudoun school board is in favor of academic acceleration. As long as the state lets school districts manage it, I’m not as worried.
Anonymous wrote:I actually like the new pathway but there needs to be a track for advancement for it to be truly equitable. I am sure FCPS has been watching from the sidetrack for awhile and thinking about it.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Seem like Terry McAuliffe is quiet about these proposed changes.I take his silence as suppressing gifted kids and high achievers.
You should read up on latest so you don’t sound like a low-info rube.
They are proposing to mix up the course content to blend it together, not removing acceleration or advanced classes.
So you’re telling me the elementary and middle school advanced academic and honors classes will still be around? Advanced academics for gifted kids starts in 3rd where they skip a grade level math. Since you read it all, tell me if that’s true. I don’t see any acceleration until possibly 6th grade.
They have walked it back and said districts are free to do acceleration and honors classes. Their videos say otherwise, and they want to eliminate acceleration, they are just going to do it a little more stealthily, and wait until after the election to walkback their walkback.
Ugh voting R to be safe. The districts may be discouraged to do acceleration. VDOE may not provide them with the resources. The whole thing looks shady.
I don’t trust my school District either, it’s a very liberal
School board. I am pretty sure they love that “equity math” as they call it and offers no acceleration. I will wait until June to decide on my candidate based on what I hear from now till then.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Then you probably are already an R voter. Those of us that were trying to swallow our souls to stomach voting R on this are relieved not to have to do this. I took screen shots of the session and the clear language about not banning advanced classes / acceleration. I frankly doubt McAuliffe wants to court this trouble by reversing the walk back if he’s elected. (Other D candidates might though). I’ll leave my protest vote for the next FCPS SB election...
I don't get a sign that FCPS is changing anything in response to VMPI. Their issue is with TJ and other equity initiatives.
Other districts are changing, and they are still pushing behind the scenes to end acceleration and tracking.
Anonymous wrote:
Then you probably are already an R voter. Those of us that were trying to swallow our souls to stomach voting R on this are relieved not to have to do this. I took screen shots of the session and the clear language about not banning advanced classes / acceleration. I frankly doubt McAuliffe wants to court this trouble by reversing the walk back if he’s elected. (Other D candidates might though). I’ll leave my protest vote for the next FCPS SB election...
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Great example of parents paying attention, reaching out to elected officials and getting answers. I watched earlier webinars. There was definitely reason for concern. The clarity they offered this week is reassuring, but still something to monitor in the coming year or two.
Nice work to everyone who reached out.
+1 originally they were very clear that they wanted to get rid of any tracking/acceleration before 11th grade. they have backed away from that due to political pressure. Good job everyone who reached out.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Seem like Terry McAuliffe is quiet about these proposed changes.I take his silence as suppressing gifted kids and high achievers.
You should read up on latest so you don’t sound like a low-info rube.
They are proposing to mix up the course content to blend it together, not removing acceleration or advanced classes.
So you’re telling me the elementary and middle school advanced academic and honors classes will still be around? Advanced academics for gifted kids starts in 3rd where they skip a grade level math. Since you read it all, tell me if that’s true. I don’t see any acceleration until possibly 6th grade.
They have walked it back and said districts are free to do acceleration and honors classes. Their videos say otherwise, and they want to eliminate acceleration, they are just going to do it a little more stealthily, and wait until after the election to walkback their walkback.
Ugh voting R to be safe. The districts may be discouraged to do acceleration. VDOE may not provide them with the resources. The whole thing looks shady.