Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Just announced a plea deal with minimal consequences on the girls. What a joke. Welcome to San Francisco everyone. Soon we will look as devastated as the Bronx in the 1970s.

Where are you reading this? I have done a search online (wtop, nbc4, WaPo) and can’t find anything.

The Daily Mail story that's going around is just a rehash of last week's WaPo story where they said a plea deal was in the works but not completed yet. There has been nothing new in this case. Next hearing isn't for another couple of weeks.

Because they need you to stop paying attention.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Just announced a plea deal with minimal consequences on the girls. What a joke. Welcome to San Francisco everyone. Soon we will look as devastated as the Bronx in the 1970s.

Where are you reading this? I have done a search online (wtop, nbc4, WaPo) and can’t find anything.

The Daily Mail story that's going around is just a rehash of last week's WaPo story where they said a plea deal was in the works but not completed yet. There has been nothing new in this case. Next hearing isn't for another couple of weeks.

Anonymous wrote:Just announced a plea deal with minimal consequences on the girls. What a joke. Welcome to San Francisco everyone. Soon we will look as devastated as the Bronx in the 1970s.

Where are you reading this? I have done a search online (wtop, nbc4, WaPo) and can’t find anything.

We have the whole action recorded. There is not a single doubt about what happened. Those girls clearly showed they are very dangerous and they have not a single drop of compassion on their blood. It was not the first time. WHAT ELSE DOES THE JUDGE NEED? Isn't anybody responsible for this crime? Where are their guardians? Will they be punished at least?

Are we living in a Western movie?

If this is the kind of example the criminals will get, I am buying a gun right now! If the law will only protect criminals, who will protect us?

What kind of judge is that? Apparently, the lack of feelings is not exclusive to the girls.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Birth control must be free and actively offered to families in crisis levels of poverty. How different things would be.

Uhhh... you don't know much about birth control, do you? It is free for poor people.

Many want babies because babies come with benefits, and screw the babies

We agree, I was just telling the person that poor people already have access to free birth control in the United States through a variety of mechanisms.

Yes but I also agree with the social worker who posted about section 8 people - BC needs to be VERY easily accessible. Lack of planning capabilities, poor impulse control - many people won’t go and renew prescriptions or fill out paperwork.

Are you going to force people to use it? Are we going to place social workers in every bedroom?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Birth control must be free and actively offered to families in crisis levels of poverty. How different things would be.

Uhhh... you don't know much about birth control, do you? It is free for poor people.

Many want babies because babies come with benefits, and screw the babies

We agree, I was just telling the person that poor people already have access to free birth control in the United States through a variety of mechanisms.

Yes but I also agree with the social worker who posted about section 8 people - BC needs to be VERY easily accessible. Lack of planning capabilities, poor impulse control - many people won’t go and renew prescriptions or fill out paperwork.

Anonymous wrote:I can't believe they let them walk... thats bad even by DC standards. They don't even get a "jail like setting" for the few years they will be away from society...


Wow. Just wow.

What matters is that they are away and people are a little safer for a few years.

Anonymous wrote:Actually, what is wrong with making by pills available to all people? White, black green or purple?

Actually not a bad idea. Mailing them to every female 9-55. Adding an extra medications bin for disposed medications to each household/apartment complex.
Gives USPS a boost too.

I can't believe they let them walk... thats bad even by DC standards. They don't even get a "jail like setting" for the few years they will be away from society...


Wow. Just wow.

Just announced a plea deal with minimal consequences on the girls. What a joke. Welcome to San Francisco everyone. Soon we will look as devastated as the Bronx in the 1970s.

Anonymous wrote:Love the liberal elites that want to defund the police AND take away your gun.

AND let the girls walk

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:When I was a sophomore at Georgetown in the mid 90s I was arrested with a little less than a half pound of weed in my backpack.

My family spent close to $30,000 keeping me from going to jail. And I still plead guilty and was on probation for 2 years. This was a nonviolent crime and the search that turned up the pot was 100% illegal, though allowed anyway.

I'm a white male. Tell me about privilege. These pieces of sh*t will walk.

If you were black you might still be in jail for that crime.

Not if $30k was spent on an attorney. You might still be in jail for this crime if you couldn't afford an competent lawyer (public defenders).

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why did they stop the GoFundme campaign? Seemed like lots of people still wanted to donate to it.

Didn't they get a million bucks out of it? That is more than enough money to cover funeral expenses and tying up whatever his remaining financial obligations are.

He has a huge family he waa taking care of. What is the value of a life?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why did they stop the GoFundme campaign? Seemed like lots of people still wanted to donate to it.

Didn't they get a million bucks out of it? That is more than enough money to cover funeral expenses and tying up whatever his remaining financial obligations are.

But tort limits are a problem.