Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It is still early to tell with the younger age groups. It will be more clear in Jan at the DA ID sessions. Many of the 07s are still deciding where to focus trying out.
Agree.
in Virginia FCV 07s will stay for DA. They are ranked 154 in region 1, but a better team then that. The 2 big power clubs with very strong 07 girls are Loudoun (ranked #8) and Mclean (#26), but they are the ECNL, so any DA shift may not occur unless say top 3-5 at each club defect. The other 2 DAs, WS and arlington (#102) are either non-existent or a weaker group, so if everyone stays home, it will all be spread out and diluted again with 2 strong ECNL clubs at that age . . . . . Loudoun + Mclean.
braddock (#110) is the ECNL but probably lower on chain.
All speculation but a lot may be about the DAs trying to get commits before the ECNLdoes . . . . . why doesn't the ECNL change that approch and go earlier?
Anonymous wrote:It is still early to tell with the younger age groups. It will be more clear in Jan at the DA ID sessions. Many of the 07s are still deciding where to focus trying out.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:based on what i've seen with my own eyes, no. There are strong younger players in both DA and ECNL as of now. The move may be starting, but it's not a total shift. It may take a few years to get to that point, in my opinion.
I tend to lean with this asssment. But kids tend to follow their friends so there may be some pockets where a shift happens more dramatically and others where none occurs as some teams may prefer to stay together.
Anonymous wrote:based on what i've seen with my own eyes, no. There are strong younger players in both DA and ECNL as of now. The move may be starting, but it's not a total shift. It may take a few years to get to that point, in my opinion.
Anonymous wrote:There are too many DAs in our area within short distance of each other. There's simply not enough talent to go around.
Awarding Arlington older age groups DA status will only further dilute the talent in the DAs.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The pro- and anti- Washington Spirit crazy trainers on this board have convinced me that staying for girls DA in Arlington was probably DDs best soccer decision to date!
What formation does Arlington use? If there is no U16 official DA team, what is Arlington's plans for its 04s?
This has also been covered waaaaaay back. The likely plan for Arlington DA is the age groups will be added as the 04’s progress. The concern was that their 03 on up age groups may have been to thin to support a competitive DA. This allows Arlington to grow and scale the program properly.
How much guarantee Arlingon got from US soccer that it will indeed happen? Does it depend on the 04 team performing?
They have no idea how the 04's would perform this year when they were awarded a DA so why would it matter next year? Arlington is big club that is better to have in DA than not. I don't think it is so much of a guarantee as much as it is the likely the plan.
100% agree. Arlington makes sense as a Girls DA team. I can't imagine that the plan by US Soccer isn't to continue adding to the program much like it often does on the boys side.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The pro- and anti- Washington Spirit crazy trainers on this board have convinced me that staying for girls DA in Arlington was probably DDs best soccer decision to date!
What formation does Arlington use? If there is no U16 official DA team, what is Arlington's plans for its 04s?
This has also been covered waaaaaay back. The likely plan for Arlington DA is the age groups will be added as the 04’s progress. The concern was that their 03 on up age groups may have been to thin to support a competitive DA. This allows Arlington to grow and scale the program properly.
How much guarantee Arlingon got from US soccer that it will indeed happen? Does it depend on the 04 team performing?
They have no idea how the 04's would perform this year when they were awarded a DA so why would it matter next year? Arlington is big club that is better to have in DA than not. I don't think it is so much of a guarantee as much as it is the likely the plan.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The pro- and anti- Washington Spirit crazy trainers on this board have convinced me that staying for girls DA in Arlington was probably DDs best soccer decision to date!
What formation does Arlington use? If there is no U16 official DA team, what is Arlington's plans for its 04s?
This has also been covered waaaaaay back. The likely plan for Arlington DA is the age groups will be added as the 04’s progress. The concern was that their 03 on up age groups may have been to thin to support a competitive DA. This allows Arlington to grow and scale the program properly.
How much guarantee Arlingon got from US soccer that it will indeed happen? Does it depend on the 04 team performing?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The pro- and anti- Washington Spirit crazy trainers on this board have convinced me that staying for girls DA in Arlington was probably DDs best soccer decision to date!
What formation does Arlington use? If there is no U16 official DA team, what is Arlington's plans for its 04s?
This has also been covered waaaaaay back. The likely plan for Arlington DA is the age groups will be added as the 04’s progress. The concern was that their 03 on up age groups may have been to thin to support a competitive DA. This allows Arlington to grow and scale the program properly.