So say you were shopping for some snacks or pumping some gas at said gas station/convienence store... Four muscular guys who had been drinking show up, it's what 5/6am and they wander around the back of the store, walk around to the front, pee on a wall or two and possibly break some items in the restroom ... Do you get into your car after pumping your gas or buying your snacks or do you go in and complain? Do you feel safe while you are there because they are what only 6'2-6'4 and not bothering anyone or anything right? You're ok with that, so you just mind your business or do you intervene and say something?

Whoops....should be "Feigen"

And Fiegen has to pay $11,000 to a charity to get his passport back...as if the first extortion to cover the damage (and then some I imagine) wasn't enough. Way to go brazil, remind me to never go.

Now I know why Casey Anthony is free... Just look at the Ryan is innocent!!123 F$&@ you Brazil!! gang...

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Just because it's the way it happens in Rio, doesn't mean that it's right or ok.

Yes, other countries have different laws and different judicial systems but I think that most rational people can agree that two civiilian men pointing guns at you and demanding that you pay for something is extreme and outrageous.

American laws etc. don't apply in Rio. Don't like it? Don't go to Rio and act like an ass.

The demand wasn't paying for "something". It wasn't a case of "I want this and don't have money, you pay for it." The demand was for damages the athletes caused.

And this is why a corrupt country should not be allowed to host the Olympics. If you don't want to be allowed to shakedown people, you don't get to host countries from all over.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Would any of YOU engage in questionable behavior in Rio and not expect to have a negative encounter with the police? Their laws and law enforcement are not the same as they are here. A shakedown is normal. They were not forced upon threat of injury to give money over (armed robbery), they were coerced through the power of persuasion that authority has to give the storeowner the money they owed him for damages. They should have left well enough alone and shut up about it. Only because Lochte wanted to be some kind of devil may care American hero with his "I didn't get down" story did this even blow up.

+1

We get it is normal. It still isn't ok. And is still robbery.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I get it that Lochte is widely despised and an embarrassment to the US Olympic team. But three things about this story keep my outrage firmly on the side of Brazil:

- Officials have investigated but brought forth no evidence of the damage supposedly done.
- There really can't be a legitimate legal system that allows on-the-spot demand for restitution.
- A five-figure fine for false allegations against the police - again with flimsy "investigation" and no evidence produced, sounds like a very good way to make abusive practices a normal and lucrative racket.

They 're not obligated to provide it to the whole flipping interwebs. They are police in a different country. This would be a little bit more st
Pathetic of a story of these dummies had inadvertently broken Brazilian law while feeding baby animals at a petting zoo or something, but they tore up a gas station then made a false police report.

And peed outside the store! I don't think they made a police report though. Lochte bragged about the robbery on twitter or facebook, and that's how it came to the attention of the police. He made up the robbery story to impress people with how he stood up to the robbers while his fellow teammates supposively cowered on the ground. Douche.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Would any of YOU engage in questionable behavior in Rio and not expect to have a negative encounter with the police? Their laws and law enforcement are not the same as they are here. A shakedown is normal. They were not forced upon threat of injury to give money over (armed robbery), they were coerced through the power of persuasion that authority has to give the storeowner the money they owed him for damages. They should have left well enough alone and shut up about it. Only because Lochte wanted to be some kind of devil may care American hero with his "I didn't get down" story did this even blow up.

They didn't have a negative encounter with police. Two civilians pointed guns at them and made them give them money to fix what they broke BEFORE police could get there.

They were absolutely forced upon threat of injury to give money over - that's what the guns were for!

Oh please they were never going to be shot

"What are you going to do, shoot me?" said shooting victim.

Anonymous wrote:I get it that Lochte is widely despised and an embarrassment to the US Olympic team. But three things about this story keep my outrage firmly on the side of Brazil:

- Officials have investigated but brought forth no evidence of the damage supposedly done.
- There really can't be a legitimate legal system that allows on-the-spot demand for restitution.
- A five-figure fine for false allegations against the police - again with flimsy "investigation" and no evidence produced, sounds like a very good way to make abusive practices a normal and lucrative racket.

They 're not obligated to provide it to the whole flipping interwebs. They are police in a different country. This would be a little bit more st
Pathetic of a story of these dummies had inadvertently broken Brazilian law while feeding baby animals at a petting zoo or something, but they tore up a gas station then made a false police report.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Would any of YOU engage in questionable behavior in Rio and not expect to have a negative encounter with the police? Their laws and law enforcement are not the same as they are here. A shakedown is normal. They were not forced upon threat of injury to give money over (armed robbery), they were coerced through the power of persuasion that authority has to give the storeowner the money they owed him for damages. They should have left well enough alone and shut up about it. Only because Lochte wanted to be some kind of devil may care American hero with his "I didn't get down" story did this even blow up.

They didn't have a negative encounter with police. Two civilians pointed guns at them and made them give them money to fix what they broke BEFORE police could get there.

They were absolutely forced upon threat of injury to give money over - that's what the guns were for!

Oh please they were never going to be shot

You couldn't possibly know that....don't kid yourself PP....Brazil is one of the most murderous countries in the world....Fact.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Would any of YOU engage in questionable behavior in Rio and not expect to have a negative encounter with the police? Their laws and law enforcement are not the same as they are here. A shakedown is normal. They were not forced upon threat of injury to give money over (armed robbery), they were coerced through the power of persuasion that authority has to give the storeowner the money they owed him for damages. They should have left well enough alone and shut up about it. Only because Lochte wanted to be some kind of devil may care American hero with his "I didn't get down" story did this even blow up.

They didn't have a negative encounter with police. Two civilians pointed guns at them and made them give them money to fix what they broke BEFORE police could get there.

They were absolutely forced upon threat of injury to give money over - that's what the guns were for!

Oh please they were never going to be shot

Are you really that naive? We're talking about Rio here...

hey Lochte boosters, that Kane Show thread is probably feeling pretty lonely without your attention...

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Would any of YOU engage in questionable behavior in Rio and not expect to have a negative encounter with the police? Their laws and law enforcement are not the same as they are here. A shakedown is normal. They were not forced upon threat of injury to give money over (armed robbery), they were coerced through the power of persuasion that authority has to give the storeowner the money they owed him for damages. They should have left well enough alone and shut up about it. Only because Lochte wanted to be some kind of devil may care American hero with his "I didn't get down" story did this even blow up.

They didn't have a negative encounter with police. Two civilians pointed guns at them and made them give them money to fix what they broke BEFORE police could get there.

They were absolutely forced upon threat of injury to give money over - that's what the guns were for!

Oh please they were never going to be shot

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The problem with this story is that it doesn't even matter....He broke a door handle and was extorted for money at gunpoint to "fix" it, who the f*k cares. Meanwhile crime and murder is rampant throughout Rio even during the games...what a Sh*thole of country if this is what they choose to focus all their energy on.

I think lochte is the one coming out of this looking like shit. This is not a referendum on crime in their country but personally I am impressed that they decided they weren't having it with the swimmers' bs story after they vandalized. Other countries have national pride too, not just the us.

Then they should stop extorting money at gunpoint.

Anonymous wrote:I get it that Lochte is widely despised and an embarrassment to the US Olympic team. But three things about this story keep my outrage firmly on the side of Brazil:

- Officials have investigated but brought forth no evidence of the damage supposedly done.
- There really can't be a legitimate legal system that allows on-the-spot demand for restitution.
- A five-figure fine for false allegations against the police - again with flimsy "investigation" and no evidence produced, sounds like a very good way to make abusive practices a normal and lucrative racket.

Well yes, that's just your random, uninformed and arrogant opinion.