Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don’t know how we endure another 3 years of this.

We don't have to. ICE is but a few thousand thugs.

Get your guns while you still can. Train to use them if you don't already know how. Start open carrying when ICE comes to town -- in most places this is allowed with long guns, but even some states allow handguns to be openly carried.

Be prepared to use them when necessary.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:He was a nurse at a VA hospital.

Helping someone get up out of the road. And ICE executed him.

How many nurses do you know who carry a 9mm with two magazines?

Many.

Why, are nurses not allowed to use their 2A right?

My friend of forty years is a doctor, and she carries a handgun in her purse. I tease her and say, "how are you going to get to the gun with all that other stuff in that bag", but she she CCW approved. She's been carrying for years. And she has a shotgun for the home. I have no clue what PPP lives on to ask such an inane question.

She's probably safe enough because a street punk will be scared off by the gun, but I hope she never looks at a law enforcement officer the wrong way.

Anonymous wrote:It's time to abolish the Department of Homeland Security.

It was created after 9/11 to protect Americans from terrorism. Now it's just terrorizing Americans.

Anonymous wrote:First six burly, overweight, under trained thugs tackled him to the ground. Then they started beating him, including beating him directly to the head, then they shoot him, and finally not one person render any medical assistance. And we talk about Iran. How are we any different

Anonymous wrote:The suspect was armed with a gun which the federal agents recovered.

Anonymous wrote:This is who is governing us now

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Footage of an agent removing the gun BEFORE the man was executed.

https://www.reddit.com/r/law/s/JuQyeHXPCY

Yep. Wonder what Schumer and other democrats will say?

They'll of course be very concerned and Schumer will look over his glasses at us very sternly while explaining why he's not going to do anything about it until it's politically beneficial to him.

https://www.axios.com/2026/01/24/ice-cbp-shooting-minneapolis-democrats-reaction


The bill passed the House but needs support from at least seven Senate Democrats, who are now under more pressure than ever to block it.

"The Senate should reject the DHS funding bill next week until significant reforms are added to the bill. We need a complete overhaul," Rep. Seth Magaziner (D-R.I.) said in a post on X.


"The Senate must vote against funding CBP and ICE. The House must immediately take steps to impeach Kristi Noem," Rep. Bennie Thompson (D-Miss.), the ranking member of the Homeland Security Committee, said in a statement.


The DHS bill is expected to come packaged together with legislation funding several other agencies, including the Departments of Defense and Health and Human Services, meaning Democrats would have to shut down a large portion of the government in order to block it.

Still, that's exactly what some Senate Democrats are pushing for, with Sen. Chris Murphy (D-Conn.) writing on X: "Congress should not fund this version of ICE"

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:But Rittenhouse can walk around with an automatic weapon?

See the hypocrisy here?

Yes, but he’s on the “right side” so it’s okay for him to be armed.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don't know the Tim Pool guy but I went to his Twitter account to try to understand what he meant in his tweet.

I think I see the new talking points to defend the ICE murder of this man.

They are going to say it was a mistake but justifiable self-defense. Someone yelled "gun gun!!" and an agent thought his life was in danger and so shot the victim in self defense.

One of the agents, took the gun before the guy was beaten and shot. There i literally NO justification for what happened.

Here is a synced up, two angle video: https://bsky.app/profile/dominicervolina.com/post/3md6wetpavk2q

And yet Republican politicians continue to justify it. I've come to believe there is literally nothing that will lead them to say anything different.

But why are they compelled to do this? Is it fear? Peer pressure? Just stupidity?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don't know the Tim Pool guy but I went to his Twitter account to try to understand what he meant in his tweet.

I think I see the new talking points to defend the ICE murder of this man.

They are going to say it was a mistake but justifiable self-defense. Someone yelled "gun gun!!" and an agent thought his life was in danger and so shot the victim in self defense.

One of the agents, took the gun before the guy was beaten and shot. There i literally NO justification for what happened.

Here is a synced up, two angle video: https://bsky.app/profile/dominicervolina.com/post/3md6wetpavk2q

And yet Republican politicians continue to justify it. I've come to believe there is literally nothing that will lead them to say anything different.

But why are they compelled to do this? Is it fear? Peer pressure? Just stupidity?

Anonymous wrote:But Rittenhouse can walk around with an automatic weapon?

See the hypocrisy here?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don't know the Tim Pool guy but I went to his Twitter account to try to understand what he meant in his tweet.

I think I see the new talking points to defend the ICE murder of this man.

They are going to say it was a mistake but justifiable self-defense. Someone yelled "gun gun!!" and an agent thought his life was in danger and so shot the victim in self defense.

One of the agents, took the gun before the guy was beaten and shot. There i literally NO justification for what happened.

Here is a synced up, two angle video: https://bsky.app/profile/dominicervolina.com/post/3md6wetpavk2q

And yet Republican politicians continue to justify it. I've come to believe there is literally nothing that will lead them to say anything different.

They’re going with the “rioter who came armed to kill an army” angle now. What’s truly baffling is that there is a segment of low information Trump t@rds that continue to believe it.

Anonymous wrote:It's time to abolish the Department of Homeland Security.

It was created after 9/11 to protect Americans from terrorism. Now it's just terrorizing Americans.