Anonymous
Post 04/18/2025 10:27     Subject: Re:Van Hollen in El Salvador

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:This whole thing is about due process. He was sent to a prison in El Salvador without being given due process. He needs to return here so that he can go through the due process. The Supreme Court voted 9-0 that he needs to be returned for God's sake. Do you think that the SCOTUS does not understand the laws of this country? Every single one of them voted the same way. Let that sink in.

People can make all kinds of conjectures about his gang membership or whatever, but the fact remains that he was ILLEGALLY sent to El Salvador. He was not "deported". He was merely sent there based on no evidence. This is ILLEGAL. It is FAR more important to hold our government to account than any details of this case. If we let our government do this, we are looking at a government that can do whatever it wants with people. No day in court folks. You are just sent into a black hole somewhere.


Ok. Then they should correct the paperwork errors that made this illegal and send his no good, violent, ugly, gangster self back to the country where he is an actual citizen.


Have you ever stopped to think about *why* Trump is refusing to bring him back to follow proper procedure/fix the paperwork??
snafu.

Yes. I am aware it is because the sovereign government of El Salvador said no. What do you want, Trump to invade them and kidnap Kilmar?


And so the next time Trump ignores the Supreme court, that will be ok? And when a future Dem leader does, that will be ok?

(note that MAGAs were up in arms over Biden possibly ignoring the Supreme court on student loans but he did adapt approach within existing law so do not even try and say Biden did, as he did not)


Explain to me how you propose that Trump get Kilmar back from a sovereign nation who is refusing to comply, given that he's a citizen. We cant even get US citizens back from Hamas or Russia.

Spitball some solutions. Should we trade Justin Bieber for him? Pay for his release? And to what end? To reprocess his deportation?
Anonymous
Post 04/18/2025 10:26     Subject: Re:Van Hollen in El Salvador

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:This whole thing is about due process. He was sent to a prison in El Salvador without being given due process. He needs to return here so that he can go through the due process. The Supreme Court voted 9-0 that he needs to be returned for God's sake. Do you think that the SCOTUS does not understand the laws of this country? Every single one of them voted the same way. Let that sink in.

People can make all kinds of conjectures about his gang membership or whatever, but the fact remains that he was ILLEGALLY sent to El Salvador. He was not "deported". He was merely sent there based on no evidence. This is ILLEGAL. It is FAR more important to hold our government to account than any details of this case. If we let our government do this, we are looking at a government that can do whatever it wants with people. No day in court folks. You are just sent into a black hole somewhere.


Ok. Then they should correct the paperwork errors that made this illegal and send his no good, violent, ugly, gangster self back to the country where he is an actual citizen.


Have you ever stopped to think about *why* Trump is refusing to bring him back to follow proper procedure/fix the paperwork??
snafu.

Yes. I am aware it is because the sovereign government of El Salvador said no. What do you want, Trump to invade them and kidnap Kilmar?


Trump has said he is not even going to *ask*. Considering the fact there is a contract for the U.S. to pay El Salvador for imprisoning people I imagine there may be financial incentive to cooperate with this request.

Also Republicans have been allowed into the prison while Democrats have been denied access. You are being disingenuous if you think MAGA isn’t controlling what is going on there.
Anonymous
Post 04/18/2025 10:26     Subject: Re:Van Hollen in El Salvador

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:This whole thing is about due process. He was sent to a prison in El Salvador without being given due process. He needs to return here so that he can go through the due process. The Supreme Court voted 9-0 that he needs to be returned for God's sake. Do you think that the SCOTUS does not understand the laws of this country? Every single one of them voted the same way. Let that sink in.

People can make all kinds of conjectures about his gang membership or whatever, but the fact remains that he was ILLEGALLY sent to El Salvador. He was not "deported". He was merely sent there based on no evidence. This is ILLEGAL. It is FAR more important to hold our government to account than any details of this case. If we let our government do this, we are looking at a government that can do whatever it wants with people. No day in court folks. You are just sent into a black hole somewhere.


Ok. Then they should correct the paperwork errors that made this illegal and send his no good, violent, ugly, gangster self back to the country where he is an actual citizen.


You don't have to be so nasty about someone you don't even know. Says some things about you as a person.

But yes, if we keep our noses clean by following due process, that's all we ask.


Are you at all familar with MS-13? They kill babies. I personally know one family whose daughter got wrapped up in MS-13 and they sent her back to El Salvador to keep her safe. But the gang made some calls back to the Homeland. They kidnapped her and cut her in half in the middle. Made her parents pay for each part of her.

And I'm nasty for calling evil what it is. You're naive as hell.


Are you familiar with the Supreme Court and 9 justices ruling against Trump? Do you want to establish precedent where a future president who is not your chosen party can do so, rinse and repeat?
Anonymous
Post 04/18/2025 10:25     Subject: Re:Van Hollen in El Salvador

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:This whole thing is about due process. He was sent to a prison in El Salvador without being given due process. He needs to return here so that he can go through the due process. The Supreme Court voted 9-0 that he needs to be returned for God's sake. Do you think that the SCOTUS does not understand the laws of this country? Every single one of them voted the same way. Let that sink in.

People can make all kinds of conjectures about his gang membership or whatever, but the fact remains that he was ILLEGALLY sent to El Salvador. He was not "deported". He was merely sent there based on no evidence. This is ILLEGAL. It is FAR more important to hold our government to account than any details of this case. If we let our government do this, we are looking at a government that can do whatever it wants with people. No day in court folks. You are just sent into a black hole somewhere.


Ok. Then they should correct the paperwork errors that made this illegal and send his no good, violent, ugly, gangster self back to the country where he is an actual citizen.


Have you ever stopped to think about *why* Trump is refusing to bring him back to follow proper procedure/fix the paperwork??
snafu.

Yes. I am aware it is because the sovereign government of El Salvador said no. What do you want, Trump to invade them and kidnap Kilmar?


And so the next time Trump ignores the Supreme court, that will be ok? And when a future Dem leader does, that will be ok?

(note that MAGAs were up in arms over Biden possibly ignoring the Supreme court on student loans but he did adapt approach within existing law so do not even try and say Biden did, as he did not)
Anonymous
Post 04/18/2025 10:23     Subject: Re:Van Hollen in El Salvador

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:This whole thing is about due process. He was sent to a prison in El Salvador without being given due process. He needs to return here so that he can go through the due process. The Supreme Court voted 9-0 that he needs to be returned for God's sake. Do you think that the SCOTUS does not understand the laws of this country? Every single one of them voted the same way. Let that sink in.

People can make all kinds of conjectures about his gang membership or whatever, but the fact remains that he was ILLEGALLY sent to El Salvador. He was not "deported". He was merely sent there based on no evidence. This is ILLEGAL. It is FAR more important to hold our government to account than any details of this case. If we let our government do this, we are looking at a government that can do whatever it wants with people. No day in court folks. You are just sent into a black hole somewhere.


Even accepting all you claim, let’s address the part in bold:

How?

How exactly must Trump “return” him, when El Salvador has refused to release him?

Do you want Trump to send in The Marines to get him back?

Moreover: Garcia is a citizen of El Salvador and he has no legal status whatsoever here. He has no visa to travel here.

Before you mention TPS (which expires 9/2026), TPS is ONLY for aliens who are present in the USA; TPS cannot be substituted for a visa and TPS is not available for aliens outside the USA.

Practically: in what legal manner can Garcia be brought into the USA? (even assuming his country lets him go).


Oh please. No one believes that El Salvador has “refused” to return him. Bukele is doing exactly what Trump wants him to do because he is being paid $8 million and it’s obvious that if the US really asked for him back we could easily get him back.

As the right wing judge on the 4th circuit put it, this case is just about the principle that you don’t get to illegally kidnap people from the US and then claim they lack any rights because they are outside the US.

If you disagree with that you are an unAmerican Fascist.


That is quite the unfounded conspiracy theory you have there!
Anonymous
Post 04/18/2025 10:23     Subject: Re:Van Hollen in El Salvador

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:This whole thing is about due process. He was sent to a prison in El Salvador without being given due process. He needs to return here so that he can go through the due process. The Supreme Court voted 9-0 that he needs to be returned for God's sake. Do you think that the SCOTUS does not understand the laws of this country? Every single one of them voted the same way. Let that sink in.

People can make all kinds of conjectures about his gang membership or whatever, but the fact remains that he was ILLEGALLY sent to El Salvador. He was not "deported". He was merely sent there based on no evidence. This is ILLEGAL. It is FAR more important to hold our government to account than any details of this case. If we let our government do this, we are looking at a government that can do whatever it wants with people. No day in court folks. You are just sent into a black hole somewhere.


Ok. Then they should correct the paperwork errors that made this illegal and send his no good, violent, ugly, gangster self back to the country where he is an actual citizen.


You don't have to be so nasty about someone you don't even know. Says some things about you as a person.

But yes, if we keep our noses clean by following due process, that's all we ask.


Are you at all familar with MS-13? They kill babies. I personally know one family whose daughter got wrapped up in MS-13 and they sent her back to El Salvador to keep her safe. But the gang made some calls back to the Homeland. They kidnapped her and cut her in half in the middle. Made her parents pay for each part of her.

And I'm nasty for calling evil what it is. You're naive as hell.
Anonymous
Post 04/18/2025 10:22     Subject: Re:Van Hollen in El Salvador

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:This whole thing is about due process. He was sent to a prison in El Salvador without being given due process. He needs to return here so that he can go through the due process. The Supreme Court voted 9-0 that he needs to be returned for God's sake. Do you think that the SCOTUS does not understand the laws of this country? Every single one of them voted the same way. Let that sink in.

People can make all kinds of conjectures about his gang membership or whatever, but the fact remains that he was ILLEGALLY sent to El Salvador. He was not "deported". He was merely sent there based on no evidence. This is ILLEGAL. It is FAR more important to hold our government to account than any details of this case. If we let our government do this, we are looking at a government that can do whatever it wants with people. No day in court folks. You are just sent into a black hole somewhere.


Ok. Then they should correct the paperwork errors that made this illegal and send his no good, violent, ugly, gangster self back to the country where he is an actual citizen.


Have you ever stopped to think about *why* Trump is refusing to bring him back to follow proper procedure/fix the paperwork??


So that he can set precedent that he can ignore future Supreme court rulings, obv.
Anonymous
Post 04/18/2025 10:22     Subject: Van Hollen in El Salvador

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:^ Wihtholding removal order to El Salvador--where is he now?

He was denied bail at first, and later asylum because the allowable time to claim was passed.

Between 2019 and 2025

The info in rollingstone has been reported everywhere

https://thehill.com/homenews/administration/5252884-deportation-legal-battle/

Further, "Since 2019, when he was released with the protective order, Mr Abrego Garcia's lawyers say he has had yearly check-ins with immigration officials, which he has attended "without fail and without incident"."

So he could be deported theoretically, but not to El SAlvador.

ANd again, WHERE IS HE?

Get it now?


He had check ins because he is DEPORTABLE! That’s the whole point. Citizens don’t check in with immigration. He was not permanently authorized to stay and he knew it.


The check ins were required while he pursued citizenship. If there was a point where he should have been deported, they would have. And again, there was an order that he could not be sent to El Salvador.

Look, just give it up. You are so losing on the facts here.


That’s a laughable claim. He was never eligible for citizenship and that’s why his wife never tried to get him a green card. You can’t get citizenship when you enter illegally and he had already been denied asylum. Citizenship was never on the table.


You are correct that he was in legal limbo--undeportable to EL Salvador but no path to citizenship here. Not sure to resolve that.
But the fact remains, there was a legal order prohibiting sending him to EL Salvador and the Trump admin violated it.


Why no pass to citizenship? If his wife an American citizen, why would she not petition for him to obtain a green card and citizenship?


Just curious, would he be eligible for a green card if he has a criminal history of domestic abuse? If he gets a green card but then commits a crime, is his green card revoked? If he enters the country illegally, is he eligible for a green card?


No. Considering his record of domestic violence restraining orders, he will not be allowed to adjust his status to greencard holder; either as a matter of law or discretion.

His wife simply needs to move to El Salvador and hope for his release there, where they can live in peace in his country.
Anonymous
Post 04/18/2025 10:22     Subject: Re:Van Hollen in El Salvador

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:This whole thing is about due process. He was sent to a prison in El Salvador without being given due process. He needs to return here so that he can go through the due process. The Supreme Court voted 9-0 that he needs to be returned for God's sake. Do you think that the SCOTUS does not understand the laws of this country? Every single one of them voted the same way. Let that sink in.

People can make all kinds of conjectures about his gang membership or whatever, but the fact remains that he was ILLEGALLY sent to El Salvador. He was not "deported". He was merely sent there based on no evidence. This is ILLEGAL. It is FAR more important to hold our government to account than any details of this case. If we let our government do this, we are looking at a government that can do whatever it wants with people. No day in court folks. You are just sent into a black hole somewhere.


Even accepting all you claim, let’s address the part in bold:

How?

How exactly must Trump “return” him, when El Salvador has refused to release him?

Do you want Trump to send in The Marines to get him back?

Moreover: Garcia is a citizen of El Salvador and he has no legal status whatsoever here. He has no visa to travel here.

Before you mention TPS (which expires 9/2026), TPS is ONLY for aliens who are present in the USA; TPS cannot be substituted for a visa and TPS is not available for aliens outside the USA.

Practically: in what legal manner can Garcia be brought into the USA? (even assuming his country lets him go).


Oh please. No one believes that El Salvador has “refused” to return him. Bukele is doing exactly what Trump wants him to do because he is being paid $8 million and it’s obvious that if the US really asked for him back we could easily get him back.

As the right wing judge on the 4th circuit put it, this case is just about the principle that you don’t get to illegally kidnap people from the US and then claim they lack any rights because they are outside the US.

If you disagree with that you are an unAmerican Fascist.
Anonymous
Post 04/18/2025 10:20     Subject: Van Hollen in El Salvador

On a positive note for the Trump administration, we're not talking about SIGNALGATE anymore. With any luck for Trump, we'll have one of these lack-of-due-process incidents every 1-2 weeks to distract us even more from the s**tshow that is his administration.
Anonymous
Post 04/18/2025 10:20     Subject: Re:Van Hollen in El Salvador

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:This whole thing is about due process. He was sent to a prison in El Salvador without being given due process. He needs to return here so that he can go through the due process. The Supreme Court voted 9-0 that he needs to be returned for God's sake. Do you think that the SCOTUS does not understand the laws of this country? Every single one of them voted the same way. Let that sink in.

People can make all kinds of conjectures about his gang membership or whatever, but the fact remains that he was ILLEGALLY sent to El Salvador. He was not "deported". He was merely sent there based on no evidence. This is ILLEGAL. It is FAR more important to hold our government to account than any details of this case. If we let our government do this, we are looking at a government that can do whatever it wants with people. No day in court folks. You are just sent into a black hole somewhere.


Ok. Then they should correct the paperwork errors that made this illegal and send his no good, violent, ugly, gangster self back to the country where he is an actual citizen.


Have you ever stopped to think about *why* Trump is refusing to bring him back to follow proper procedure/fix the paperwork??
snafu.

Yes. I am aware it is because the sovereign government of El Salvador said no. What do you want, Trump to invade them and kidnap Kilmar?
Anonymous
Post 04/18/2025 10:19     Subject: Re:Van Hollen in El Salvador

Anonymous wrote:This whole thing is about due process. He was sent to a prison in El Salvador without being given due process. He needs to return here so that he can go through the due process. The Supreme Court voted 9-0 that he needs to be returned for God's sake. Do you think that the SCOTUS does not understand the laws of this country? Every single one of them voted the same way. Let that sink in.

People can make all kinds of conjectures about his gang membership or whatever, but the fact remains that he was ILLEGALLY sent to El Salvador. He was not "deported". He was merely sent there based on no evidence. This is ILLEGAL. It is FAR more important to hold our government to account than any details of this case. If we let our government do this, we are looking at a government that can do whatever it wants with people. No day in court folks. You are just sent into a black hole somewhere.


I have to wonder why you think it is a politically winning argument to demand that the US bring Kilmar back for *a third time* to be processed and deported again. SCOTUS made their ruling based on the literal paperwork being wrong, not the substance of the deportation.

Besides. Kilmar is a citizen of Salvador and currently being held there on domestic charges. Seriously, who do we think we are to tell another nation they must give up a citizen of their nation to us?

People care about secure borders and reduced crime. They do not care about paperwork snafus.
Anonymous
Post 04/18/2025 10:18     Subject: Van Hollen in El Salvador

I love how whenever MAGA tries to justify deporting brown people it’s always “they didn’t follow the law, they should have done the right paperwork, etc.” But when the president of the United States does it then it’s totally fine and the libs are stupid for being upset.
Anonymous
Post 04/18/2025 10:17     Subject: Re:Van Hollen in El Salvador

Anonymous wrote:This whole thing is about due process. He was sent to a prison in El Salvador without being given due process. He needs to return here so that he can go through the due process. The Supreme Court voted 9-0 that he needs to be returned for God's sake. Do you think that the SCOTUS does not understand the laws of this country? Every single one of them voted the same way. Let that sink in.

People can make all kinds of conjectures about his gang membership or whatever, but the fact remains that he was ILLEGALLY sent to El Salvador. He was not "deported". He was merely sent there based on no evidence. This is ILLEGAL. It is FAR more important to hold our government to account than any details of this case. If we let our government do this, we are looking at a government that can do whatever it wants with people. No day in court folks. You are just sent into a black hole somewhere.


Even accepting all you claim, let’s address the part in bold:

How?

How exactly must Trump “return” him, when El Salvador has refused to release him?

Do you want Trump to send in The Marines to get him back?

Moreover: Garcia is a citizen of El Salvador and he has no legal status whatsoever here. He has no visa to travel here.

Before you mention TPS (which expires 9/2026), TPS is ONLY for aliens who are present in the USA; TPS cannot be substituted for a visa and TPS is not available for aliens outside the USA.

Practically: in what legal manner can Garcia be brought into the USA? (even assuming his country lets him go).
Anonymous
Post 04/18/2025 10:17     Subject: Re:Van Hollen in El Salvador

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:This whole thing is about due process. He was sent to a prison in El Salvador without being given due process. He needs to return here so that he can go through the due process. The Supreme Court voted 9-0 that he needs to be returned for God's sake. Do you think that the SCOTUS does not understand the laws of this country? Every single one of them voted the same way. Let that sink in.

People can make all kinds of conjectures about his gang membership or whatever, but the fact remains that he was ILLEGALLY sent to El Salvador. He was not "deported". He was merely sent there based on no evidence. This is ILLEGAL. It is FAR more important to hold our government to account than any details of this case. If we let our government do this, we are looking at a government that can do whatever it wants with people. No day in court folks. You are just sent into a black hole somewhere.


Ok. Then they should correct the paperwork errors that made this illegal and send his no good, violent, ugly, gangster self back to the country where he is an actual citizen.


Have you ever stopped to think about *why* Trump is refusing to bring him back to follow proper procedure/fix the paperwork??