Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Yes? Because normal people recognize that Trump and Vance are both weird.
But weird is good, right? We’ve been pre-programmed to respect and recognise outliers and weird creeps for so many years that now weird have a positive connotation.
Anonymous wrote:Yes? Because normal people recognize that Trump and Vance are both weird.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:NP. Both parties need to understand how different the online echo chamber is versus the average swing state voter. For the purposes of this discussion, the left-leaning terminally online crowd loves the “weird” narrative. But I don’t think it will resonate as well with the non-terminally online swing state voters, especially coming from some of the unquestionably weird Democrats. I think it’s actually likely to fall a little flat. This is red meat for the already-committed Democrat voters, but that’s not who the Democrats need to reach.
The same is true in reverse for other messaging from the Republicans, but that’s not the subject of this thread.
Polling disagrees with you.
Polling is notoriously bad at capturing swing state voters.
Per ABC News/IPSOS poll, JD's favorability rating, which was -6 coming out of the convention, is now -15. But I'm sure that's bad polling, and he's being well received by the general public.
He is indeed unpopular. But this is a presidential election.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:NP. Both parties need to understand how different the online echo chamber is versus the average swing state voter. For the purposes of this discussion, the left-leaning terminally online crowd loves the “weird” narrative. But I don’t think it will resonate as well with the non-terminally online swing state voters, especially coming from some of the unquestionably weird Democrats. I think it’s actually likely to fall a little flat. This is red meat for the already-committed Democrat voters, but that’s not who the Democrats need to reach.
The same is true in reverse for other messaging from the Republicans, but that’s not the subject of this thread.
Polling disagrees with you.
Polling is notoriously bad at capturing swing state voters.
Per ABC News/IPSOS poll, JD's favorability rating, which was -6 coming out of the convention, is now -15. But I'm sure that's bad polling, and he's being well received by the general public.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:NP. Both parties need to understand how different the online echo chamber is versus the average swing state voter. For the purposes of this discussion, the left-leaning terminally online crowd loves the “weird” narrative. But I don’t think it will resonate as well with the non-terminally online swing state voters, especially coming from some of the unquestionably weird Democrats. I think it’s actually likely to fall a little flat. This is red meat for the already-committed Democrat voters, but that’s not who the Democrats need to reach.
The same is true in reverse for other messaging from the Republicans, but that’s not the subject of this thread.
Polling disagrees with you.
Polling is notoriously bad at capturing swing state voters.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:NP. Both parties need to understand how different the online echo chamber is versus the average swing state voter. For the purposes of this discussion, the left-leaning terminally online crowd loves the “weird” narrative. But I don’t think it will resonate as well with the non-terminally online swing state voters, especially coming from some of the unquestionably weird Democrats. I think it’s actually likely to fall a little flat. This is red meat for the already-committed Democrat voters, but that’s not who the Democrats need to reach.
The same is true in reverse for other messaging from the Republicans, but that’s not the subject of this thread.
Polling disagrees with you.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Exactly. There is nothing about this guy that doesn't come off as creepy.
There's a lot of weird going on in politics in general.
That said, it's definitely weird that someone would think that Republicans would be fazed at being called creepy by the party that ran Joe Biden as their candidate. "Creepy Joe" was literally one of their nicknames for him.
And projection is core to the GOP playbooks, so...