Anonymous wrote:Why is he going off on Chris Christie?
Anonymous wrote:Why is he going off on Chris Christie?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
I guess you've never sat in a jury for a jury trial, huh? When I sat, we had some long days. We had one day when the jury had to report to the courthouse at 9:00 AM and were brought into the court room at 9:30 AM. The trail continued from the previous day from about 9:40 PM until lunch and then we were there until 4:30 PM. We were in session for 6 hours and then we had to go to the jury room and we deliberated until almost 6:00 PM when they asked us to return at 9:00 AM to continue deliberation.
6+ hours is longer than average, but not some unreasonably long day.
Of course I have. It was sarcasm. Trump whines about everything and backs it up with "all the best [unnamed] legal scholars" agreeing they've never seen such treatment. I'll post something in a second where he actually named one of these scholars this time, Sean Hannity.
Oh, the Sean Hannity one was just posted. He put out a TON of material yesterday for this thread. Enough for an article to be written about it.
https://www.yahoo.com/news/trump-slurs-words-struggles-gain-023422305.html
“Slurring his words at a Waukesha, Wisconsin rally, Trump referred to Biden’s “fake infrastrucker, ershure para,” before settling on “a package of infrastructure.” Minutes later, the 77-year-old launched into a rant about Master Lock, again slipping into incoherence.”
Master Lock:
somehow this is the guy they're giving it all away for
I chaperoned my kid's field trip yesterday, part of which involved a re-enactment of the debate leading up to the Patrick Henry "Give me liberty or give me death" speech in the church it occurred. It was an enthralling experience all around (what was said, where it was said, what it led to, etc.) Then I come back to this thread/board, and it's just striking to take in that Trump's corruption, insurrection, and incoherence is where the GOP and this country has landed.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
I guess you've never sat in a jury for a jury trial, huh? When I sat, we had some long days. We had one day when the jury had to report to the courthouse at 9:00 AM and were brought into the court room at 9:30 AM. The trail continued from the previous day from about 9:40 PM until lunch and then we were there until 4:30 PM. We were in session for 6 hours and then we had to go to the jury room and we deliberated until almost 6:00 PM when they asked us to return at 9:00 AM to continue deliberation.
6+ hours is longer than average, but not some unreasonably long day.
Of course I have. It was sarcasm. Trump whines about everything and backs it up with "all the best [unnamed] legal scholars" agreeing they've never seen such treatment. I'll post something in a second where he actually named one of these scholars this time, Sean Hannity.
Oh, the Sean Hannity one was just posted. He put out a TON of material yesterday for this thread. Enough for an article to be written about it.
https://www.yahoo.com/news/trump-slurs-words-struggles-gain-023422305.html
“Slurring his words at a Waukesha, Wisconsin rally, Trump referred to Biden’s “fake infrastrucker, ershure para,” before settling on “a package of infrastructure.” Minutes later, the 77-year-old launched into a rant about Master Lock, again slipping into incoherence.”
Master Lock:
somehow this is the guy they're giving it all away for
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
I guess you've never sat in a jury for a jury trial, huh? When I sat, we had some long days. We had one day when the jury had to report to the courthouse at 9:00 AM and were brought into the court room at 9:30 AM. The trail continued from the previous day from about 9:40 PM until lunch and then we were there until 4:30 PM. We were in session for 6 hours and then we had to go to the jury room and we deliberated until almost 6:00 PM when they asked us to return at 9:00 AM to continue deliberation.
6+ hours is longer than average, but not some unreasonably long day.
Of course I have. It was sarcasm. Trump whines about everything and backs it up with "all the best [unnamed] legal scholars" agreeing they've never seen such treatment. I'll post something in a second where he actually named one of these scholars this time, Sean Hannity.
Oh, the Sean Hannity one was just posted. He put out a TON of material yesterday for this thread. Enough for an article to be written about it.
https://www.yahoo.com/news/trump-slurs-words-struggles-gain-023422305.html
“Slurring his words at a Waukesha, Wisconsin rally, Trump referred to Biden’s “fake infrastrucker, ershure para,” before settling on “a package of infrastructure.” Minutes later, the 77-year-old launched into a rant about Master Lock, again slipping into incoherence.”
Master Lock:
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
I guess you've never sat in a jury for a jury trial, huh? When I sat, we had some long days. We had one day when the jury had to report to the courthouse at 9:00 AM and were brought into the court room at 9:30 AM. The trail continued from the previous day from about 9:40 PM until lunch and then we were there until 4:30 PM. We were in session for 6 hours and then we had to go to the jury room and we deliberated until almost 6:00 PM when they asked us to return at 9:00 AM to continue deliberation.
6+ hours is longer than average, but not some unreasonably long day.
Of course I have. It was sarcasm. Trump whines about everything and backs it up with "all the best [unnamed] legal scholars" agreeing they've never seen such treatment. I'll post something in a second where he actually named one of these scholars this time, Sean Hannity.
Oh, the Sean Hannity one was just posted. He put out a TON of material yesterday for this thread. Enough for an article to be written about it.
https://www.yahoo.com/news/trump-slurs-words-struggles-gain-023422305.html
“Slurring his words at a Waukesha, Wisconsin rally, Trump referred to Biden’s “fake infrastrucker, ershure para,” before settling on “a package of infrastructure.” Minutes later, the 77-year-old launched into a rant about Master Lock, again slipping into incoherence.”
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
I guess you've never sat in a jury for a jury trial, huh? When I sat, we had some long days. We had one day when the jury had to report to the courthouse at 9:00 AM and were brought into the court room at 9:30 AM. The trail continued from the previous day from about 9:40 PM until lunch and then we were there until 4:30 PM. We were in session for 6 hours and then we had to go to the jury room and we deliberated until almost 6:00 PM when they asked us to return at 9:00 AM to continue deliberation.
6+ hours is longer than average, but not some unreasonably long day.
Of course I have. It was sarcasm. Trump whines about everything and backs it up with "all the best [unnamed] legal scholars" agreeing they've never seen such treatment. I'll post something in a second where he actually named one of these scholars this time, Sean Hannity.
Oh, the Sean Hannity one was just posted. He put out a TON of material yesterday for this thread. Enough for an article to be written about it.
https://www.yahoo.com/news/trump-slurs-words-struggles-gain-023422305.html

Anonymous wrote:
"91 million dollars...hopefully the appeal process works because if it doesn't you just don't have a country." That may be the dumbest thing he's said so far in the 40 pages of this thread.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
I guess you've never sat in a jury for a jury trial, huh? When I sat, we had some long days. We had one day when the jury had to report to the courthouse at 9:00 AM and were brought into the court room at 9:30 AM. The trail continued from the previous day from about 9:40 PM until lunch and then we were there until 4:30 PM. We were in session for 6 hours and then we had to go to the jury room and we deliberated until almost 6:00 PM when they asked us to return at 9:00 AM to continue deliberation.
6+ hours is longer than average, but not some unreasonably long day.
Of course I have. It was sarcasm. Trump whines about everything and backs it up with "all the best [unnamed] legal scholars" agreeing they've never seen such treatment. I'll post something in a second where he actually named one of these scholars this time, Sean Hannity.
Anonymous wrote:
I guess you've never sat in a jury for a jury trial, huh? When I sat, we had some long days. We had one day when the jury had to report to the courthouse at 9:00 AM and were brought into the court room at 9:30 AM. The trail continued from the previous day from about 9:40 PM until lunch and then we were there until 4:30 PM. We were in session for 6 hours and then we had to go to the jury room and we deliberated until almost 6:00 PM when they asked us to return at 9:00 AM to continue deliberation.
6+ hours is longer than average, but not some unreasonably long day.
Anonymous wrote:
"91 million dollars...hopefully the appeal process works because if it doesn't you just don't have a country." That may be the dumbest thing he's said so far in the 40 pages of this thread.