Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Yes Lindsay Graham already lost that battle all the way up to the Supreme Court, although that was for the Speech and Debate clause of the Constitution, not executive privilege.
Pretty sure Meadows already lost on claiming executive privilege for the Jan 6 committee. I can't see what additional grounds he could get it moved to Federal court.
https://www.nytimes.com/2022/11/01/us/politics/supreme-court-lindsey-graham-georgia.html
https://www.cnn.com/2023/03/24/politics/trump-aides-executive-privilege-meadows/index.html
This is not an executive privilege claim. It’s federal officer removal. It is based on a statute (28 USC 1442) and requires the defendant be a federal officer “acting under color of” federal office, and have a plausible federal defense.
He is charged for participating in the phone calls and text messages to Georgia officials pressuring them to throw out the election results and declare Trump the winner and for sending them all the crazy election fraud theories with no supporting evidence or law in an attempt to justify the demand to blow up democracy.
None of that is remotely related to his official government duties. They are fraudulent campaign activities that he is supposed to be barred from doing while working in the White House.
Thank you for posting this. Hallelujah.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
What dumb move? This isn't a political trial. It's a criminal trial. They take as long as they take.
Except it won’t ever happen if he gets elected again.
That is uncharted waters. No one really seems to know the answer to whether a sitting president can be tried in state court for crimes committed prior to becoming the president.
Anonymous wrote:
What dumb move? This isn't a political trial. It's a criminal trial. They take as long as they take.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
What dumb move? This isn't a political trial. It's a criminal trial. They take as long as they take.
Except it won’t ever happen if he gets elected again.
Anonymous wrote:
What dumb move? This isn't a political trial. It's a criminal trial. They take as long as they take.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What happens is a lot of the MAGAs realize they have been duped, get mad at the "system" and never vote again. Combined with abortion hopefully getting settled by a pro-choice house and senate so as to never be an issue again, leaves the GOP without a voting base until it figures out a new platform.
Oh, hey, they have a new platform: Anti-Trans Hate!! Trans folk overrunning schools and kidnapping your children!! You read it here first, folks!!
Yeah, this seems to be the next big "issue" for the right.
Hopefully, Covid has killed off more or their voters than the GOP thought.
Aren't you a gem?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The Fulton County, Georgia, court's website briefly posted a document appearing to detail several criminal charges against Donald Trump this morning before taking the document down without explanation.
The document was dated Aug. 14 and named Trump, citing the case as "open."
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What happens is a lot of the MAGAs realize they have been duped, get mad at the "system" and never vote again. Combined with abortion hopefully getting settled by a pro-choice house and senate so as to never be an issue again, leaves the GOP without a voting base until it figures out a new platform.
Oh, hey, they have a new platform: Anti-Trans Hate!! Trans folk overrunning schools and kidnapping your children!! You read it here first, folks!!
Yeah, this seems to be the next big "issue" for the right.
Hopefully, Covid has killed off more or their voters than the GOP thought.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Meadows is trying to get the case moved to federal court. https://www.cnn.com/2023/08/15/politics/mark-meadows-fulton-case-federal-court/index.html
There is no legal basis for granting this.
Well, Meadows actually was a federal officer at the time of the alleged activity. It's not a slam dunk, but he does have grounds.
However, not sure it would even make a difference. The Atlanta federal courthouse still pulls from the Atlanta metro.
I think it's a stretch to say that conspiring to overthrow an election was part of his official duties.