Anonymous
11/05/2022 14:01
Subject: Fetterman - Oz Debate — anyone keeping tabs on this?
Curious. Are in PA? And, what do you like about Oz? I simply can't imagine a snake oil salesman as my chosen representative in the Senate. We watched him screw over chubby America to make a buck for years. Why do you think he won't screw over you for the same? He doesn't even have any real values of his own. It's NUTTY.
Anonymous
11/05/2022 10:52
Subject: Fetterman - Oz Debate — anyone keeping tabs on this?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think it’s hilarious that nobody can point to a single accomplishment that qualifies fetterman for the office……not one.
Plenty of posts have pointed to plenty of qualifications. You are laughing in denial.
Actually laughing at useless posters like you who continue to provide no evidence of accomplishment
There have been plenty of posts. You don’t want a serious discussion, so why bother with buffoons like you?
What has your hero Oz done by the way, other than serve in the Turkish armed forces and shop at Wegner’s?
Well, Oz did teach Pennsylvanians the meaning of crudités. Does that count for something?
Anonymous
11/05/2022 09:29
Subject: Fetterman - Oz Debate — anyone keeping tabs on this?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think it’s hilarious that nobody can point to a single accomplishment that qualifies fetterman for the office……not one.
Plenty of posts have pointed to plenty of qualifications. You are laughing in denial.
Actually laughing at useless posters like you who continue to provide no evidence of accomplishment
There have been plenty of posts. You don’t want a serious discussion, so why bother with buffoons like you?
What has your hero Oz done by the way, other than serve in the Turkish armed forces and shop at Wegner’s?
Anonymous
11/05/2022 09:09
Subject: Fetterman - Oz Debate — anyone keeping tabs on this?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think it’s hilarious that nobody can point to a single accomplishment that qualifies fetterman for the office……not one.
Plenty of posts have pointed to plenty of qualifications. You are laughing in denial.
Actually laughing at useless posters like you who continue to provide no evidence of accomplishment
Anonymous
11/05/2022 09:03
Subject: Fetterman - Oz Debate — anyone keeping tabs on this?
Anonymous wrote:I think it’s hilarious that nobody can point to a single accomplishment that qualifies fetterman for the office……not one.
Fetterman was unimpressive at his peak and now has health issues that further reduce his ability to do the job. Oz is sketchy. Pennsylvania doesnt have good choices.
Anonymous
11/05/2022 08:36
Subject: Fetterman - Oz Debate — anyone keeping tabs on this?
Anonymous wrote:I think it’s hilarious that nobody can point to a single accomplishment that qualifies fetterman for the office……not one.
Plenty of posts have pointed to plenty of qualifications. You are laughing in denial.
Anonymous
11/05/2022 08:27
Subject: Fetterman - Oz Debate — anyone keeping tabs on this?
I think it’s hilarious that nobody can point to a single accomplishment that qualifies fetterman for the office……not one.
Anonymous
11/03/2022 17:11
Subject: Fetterman - Oz Debate — anyone keeping tabs on this?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
And 2018 and 2020 taught you what?
Polls in 2020 had democrats comfortably taking the senate. Gideon is still wondering what happened.
And they did in fact take control of the Senate.
comfortably is the key word. None of their policy goals ever even got a vote, instead we got a bloated infrastructure bill that required the coal industry's best friend to sign off
The 538 forecast pegged 51-49 and 52-48 as the most likely outcomes, with 50-50 as pretty close. Anything above 52 was pretty unlikely. Seems like they did a good job to me.
50-50 meant voting rights never happened.
Wouldn't have happened at 51-49 either.
it might have with 52. We'll never know now
Possibly, but that was at the outer edge of what was likely per the polls. The polls were pretty good overall for 2020 senate races.
Anonymous
11/03/2022 17:09
Subject: Fetterman - Oz Debate — anyone keeping tabs on this?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
And 2018 and 2020 taught you what?
Polls in 2020 had democrats comfortably taking the senate. Gideon is still wondering what happened.
And they did in fact take control of the Senate.
comfortably is the key word. None of their policy goals ever even got a vote, instead we got a bloated infrastructure bill that required the coal industry's best friend to sign off
The 538 forecast pegged 51-49 and 52-48 as the most likely outcomes, with 50-50 as pretty close. Anything above 52 was pretty unlikely. Seems like they did a good job to me.
50-50 meant voting rights never happened.
Wouldn't have happened at 51-49 either.
it might have with 52. We'll never know now
Anonymous
11/03/2022 17:08
Subject: Fetterman - Oz Debate — anyone keeping tabs on this?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
And 2018 and 2020 taught you what?
Polls in 2020 had democrats comfortably taking the senate. Gideon is still wondering what happened.
And they did in fact take control of the Senate.
comfortably is the key word. None of their policy goals ever even got a vote, instead we got a bloated infrastructure bill that required the coal industry's best friend to sign off
The 538 forecast pegged 51-49 and 52-48 as the most likely outcomes, with 50-50 as pretty close. Anything above 52 was pretty unlikely. Seems like they did a good job to me.
50-50 meant voting rights never happened.
Wouldn't have happened at 51-49 either.
Anonymous
11/03/2022 15:54
Subject: Fetterman - Oz Debate — anyone keeping tabs on this?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
And 2018 and 2020 taught you what?
Polls in 2020 had democrats comfortably taking the senate. Gideon is still wondering what happened.
And they did in fact take control of the Senate.
comfortably is the key word. None of their policy goals ever even got a vote, instead we got a bloated infrastructure bill that required the coal industry's best friend to sign off
The 538 forecast pegged 51-49 and 52-48 as the most likely outcomes, with 50-50 as pretty close. Anything above 52 was pretty unlikely. Seems like they did a good job to me.
50-50 meant voting rights never happened.
Anonymous
11/03/2022 15:45
Subject: Fetterman - Oz Debate — anyone keeping tabs on this?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
And 2018 and 2020 taught you what?
Polls in 2020 had democrats comfortably taking the senate. Gideon is still wondering what happened.
And they did in fact take control of the Senate.
comfortably is the key word. None of their policy goals ever even got a vote, instead we got a bloated infrastructure bill that required the coal industry's best friend to sign off
The 538 forecast pegged 51-49 and 52-48 as the most likely outcomes, with 50-50 as pretty close. Anything above 52 was pretty unlikely. Seems like they did a good job to me.
Anonymous
11/03/2022 14:59
Subject: Fetterman - Oz Debate — anyone keeping tabs on this?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
And 2018 and 2020 taught you what?
Polls in 2020 had democrats comfortably taking the senate. Gideon is still wondering what happened.
And they did in fact take control of the Senate.
comfortably is the key word. None of their policy goals ever even got a vote, instead we got a bloated infrastructure bill that required the coal industry's best friend to sign off
Anonymous
11/03/2022 14:52
Subject: Fetterman - Oz Debate — anyone keeping tabs on this?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
And 2018 and 2020 taught you what?
Polls in 2020 had democrats comfortably taking the senate. Gideon is still wondering what happened.
And they did in fact take control of the Senate.