Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Dcum is pretty spot on the demographic to hate this popular move.
The UMC are the only fiscally conservative demographic left in the US and it's going to be interesting watching them be taxed but excluded from benefits flowing to the poor, MC, and rich.
That's why the only option for Dems is to demonize the opponent the more the better, so that those fiscally responsible/ independent folks don't cross-over and start voting GOP as a group.
The road Biden chose is not going to be pretty.
Anonymous wrote:
It's quite a shame no Dem Governors signed such a letter.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Governors pen letter to Biden asking he withdraw the loan forgiveness. https://www.npr.org/2022/09/13/1122613813/student-loan-forgiveness-biden-states
"The governors, all Republicans,"
Anonymous wrote:Governors pen letter to Biden asking he withdraw the loan forgiveness. https://www.npr.org/2022/09/13/1122613813/student-loan-forgiveness-biden-states
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Dcum is pretty spot on the demographic to hate this popular move.
The UMC are the only fiscally conservative demographic left in the US and it's going to be interesting watching them be taxed but excluded from benefits flowing to the poor, MC, and rich.
Anonymous wrote:Dcum is pretty spot on the demographic to hate this popular move.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Wait - after waiting 18 months for this announcement before the mid-terms, are people saying they are against buying votes?
Yea, we thought sanity would prevail. Sadly, we were mistaken. Biden is moving ahead with something even his own party acknowledges is illegal. Just like using CDC to stop evictions. So much for the rule of law.
Long live the king!
Anonymous wrote:Wait - after waiting 18 months for this announcement before the mid-terms, are people saying they are against buying votes?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Would folks have an issue with loan repayment for police academy? Do they have an issue with US military receiving tuition benefits? It shouldn't be an issue to extend that concept to service professions such as nursing, teachers, etc.
Wouldn't it make more sense to let the free market do its thing, and allow pay rates to rise for those professions if there are not enough people with the needed qualifications to do the work?
Totally agree for services that aren't essential, but for essential services, the lapse in waiting for that to happen comes at the expense of the American people. I didn't agree with loan forgiveness for all, but I could absolutely support improved loan forgiveness for certain professions.
This is ridiculous logic. If it was essential and in short supply, it would be well paying.
Daycare teachers?
Nursing assistants?
Teachers?
Elder care?
Also, while customer service jobs don’t require higher ed, many management positions in the service economy do, and people don’t get rich that way. Restaurant managers, hotel managers, grocery store managers— these people are essential.