Anonymous
Post 01/23/2023 11:10     Subject: Re:2023 Boys HS lacrosse outlook
Anonymous wrote:How is it spreading false information when its common knowledge about the reclass at Hill and Bullis? Isn't sunlight the best disinfectant?


If you are this obsessed about one player and it is not your kid you have issues. There are many re-classed kids and a few double re-classed. Get over it this is not the HOCO league.
Anonymous
Post 01/23/2023 10:36     Subject: Re:2023 Boys HS lacrosse outlook
How is it spreading false information when its common knowledge about the reclass at Hill and Bullis? Isn't sunlight the best disinfectant?
Anonymous
Post 01/23/2023 10:29     Subject: Re:2023 Boys HS lacrosse outlook
Please stop spreading false information. The player in question went to Hill Academy as an 8th grader and entered Bullis as a 9th grader in the fall of 2019.
The player meets all requirements to play in the IAC and will be attending Princeton in the Fall.
Anonymous
Post 01/23/2023 09:52     Subject: Re:2023 Boys HS lacrosse outlook
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Hasn't the Bullis kid been in high school for 6 years?


No it has been 5 years.




6. One at Hill Academy and five at Bullis. He has been taking semesters off to stay within the IAC 8 semesters max rule. He was not at Bullis in the fall. Literally a grown man at this point.


that's pathetic. must feel special to beat up on 15 - 17-year-olds when he should be a freshman or sophomore in college.



It's 5. Would have been 6 if he had gone to Mater Dei.
Anonymous
Post 01/23/2023 09:09     Subject: Re:2023 Boys HS lacrosse outlook
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Hasn't the Bullis kid been in high school for 6 years?


No it has been 5 years.




6. One at Hill Academy and five at Bullis. He has been taking semesters off to stay within the IAC 8 semesters max rule. He was not at Bullis in the fall. Literally a grown man at this point.


that's pathetic. must feel special to beat up on 15 - 17-year-olds when he should be a freshman or sophomore in college.

Anonymous
Post 01/23/2023 07:58     Subject: Re:2023 Boys HS lacrosse outlook
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Hasn't the Bullis kid been in high school for 6 years?


No it has been 5 years.




6. One at Hill Academy and five at Bullis. He has been taking semesters off to stay within the IAC 8 semesters max rule. He was not at Bullis in the fall. Literally a grown man at this point.



pretty sure he did his freshman year at the Lab Schoo and then transferred to the Hill Academy and reclassified and did his freshman year again in Canada.

He at one point was considered a 2020 graduation year.
Anonymous
Post 01/23/2023 06:32     Subject: Re:2023 Boys HS lacrosse outlook
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Hasn't the Bullis kid been in high school for 6 years?


No it has been 5 years.




6. One at Hill Academy and five at Bullis. He has been taking semesters off to stay within the IAC 8 semesters max rule. He was not at Bullis in the fall. Literally a grown man at this point.
Anonymous
Post 01/22/2023 22:44     Subject: Re:2023 Boys HS lacrosse outlook
Anonymous wrote:Hasn't the Bullis kid been in high school for 6 years?


No it has been 5 years.
Anonymous
Post 01/22/2023 21:11     Subject: Re:2023 Boys HS lacrosse outlook
Hasn't the Bullis kid been in high school for 6 years?
Anonymous
Post 01/22/2023 18:38     Subject: Re:2023 Boys HS lacrosse outlook
So he is going to graduate HS at age 20? What a joke
Anonymous
Post 01/22/2023 12:56     Subject: Re:2023 Boys HS lacrosse outlook
Anonymous wrote:Historically Top 8 DC Team (in any given year)

Bullis
Gonzaga
Landon
Prep
SJC
PVI
Saint Stephens
Episcopal

Historically Top 8 MIAA A Teams (in any given year)

Boys Latin
McDonogh
Saint Mary's
Calvert Hall
St Pauls
Loyola Blakefield
Severn
Gilman

Trying to be objective here but the top 8 from each region look to be on par. (I deliberately left STA and Spalding off this list as both programs recently became relevant)

What hurts the DC area teams is the bottom half of the WCAC are really really ordinary programs (O'Connell, Ireton, Carroll, Bishop MacNamare) Whereas the bottom team in the MIAA A conference, John Carroll, is very solid (they beat Calvert Hall, and Gilman last year). Top to bottom, you can make the argument, the MIAA is the deeper conference when it comes to parity. But you are foolish if you don't think the top teams in DC are on equal footing with the top privates from Baltimore / Annapolis.







The MIAA overall is a better conference. The bottom-tier teams in the MIAA A division (John Carroll and Mt Saint Joseph's) would run over the middle-tier teams in the WCAC (the Heights, Good Counsel).
Anonymous
Post 01/22/2023 08:53     Subject: 2023 Boys HS lacrosse outlook
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Can’t play in miaa conference games

Why?



IAC doesn't allow any varsity play for students turning 19 before 9/1. MIAA allows non-conference play.
Anonymous
Post 01/22/2023 01:31     Subject: 2023 Boys HS lacrosse outlook
Anonymous wrote:Can’t play in miaa conference games

Why?
Anonymous
Post 01/21/2023 21:11     Subject: 2023 Boys HS lacrosse outlook
Can’t play in miaa conference games
Anonymous
Post 01/21/2023 12:21     Subject: Re:2023 Boys HS lacrosse outlook
Well we know McDonogh does.