Anonymous wrote:My kid is a summer birthday and I'm sending him although I get the feeling he will be the youngest and the only summer birthday. I'm pretty sure he will not be a gifted athlete and he is average height. I have no doubt he will look a year younger than everyone but I'm trying to prepare him socially and academically. He is a tough little kid so if there is no bullying then we are hoping he will be okay. I do feel that because of the redshirting and the expectations that the school is forcing most of us not to send our summer birthdays.
I hope we are doing the right thing and that it will not impact his self-esteem. If it does not work out we will move him to public, catholic school or have him repeat. I would rather have him repeat in a k curriculum than have him redshirted an repeat in pre-k. At least he will have a more challenging academic experience.
Anonymous wrote:Except there are Jan, Feb, Mar and April 2005 for this year. Really, many here are not complaining or expressing angst over summer birthdays, but this Jan-May hold-back is ridiculous.
.Anonymous wrote:Fine, whatever. Could we just stop calling it predominately summer birthdays? Kind of like claiming the age range is only 18 months. Do the math.
Anonymous wrote:Now April is counted as a summer birthday? There's a lot of high priced spin being thrown back and forth on this thread...
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Yes, and except for summer bday boys and others with developmental issues, it is rare.
Except that the Jan-May redshit ISN'T that rare.
If it were, most of this discussion wouldn't be an issue.
To 9:15 and 15:57, I'm sorry for the bad experience you obviously suffered at the hands of an older boy or on Wall Street.
Anonymous wrote:
I won't even touch the issue of how this affects the gender dynamics. In middle school and high school, when half the boys are older than all of the girls, how do you think that affects those girls?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Confidence, high self-esteem, leadership tendencies, and extrovert characteristics, however, are all qualities that lead to success in business, and are all characteristics that are born at a young age. If you think that this redshirting trend does not change the classroom dynamics enough to affect the growth of these characteristics in "on-time" children, you are WRONG. Bigger and older boys change the classroom dynamics. Of course they do. All of you taking a narrow view at this are doing this only because such a simplistic approach serves your interests. What if you had a March boy? What if he was small? Or shy? But ready for K from an intellect prespective? I think you would feel differently.
I have one DC in middle school and one DC in high school and this has not been the case at all for either of them and their classes. And I should add that the middle schooler is an August birthday, and was held back, and the high schooler is May birthday and has been in school with kids a year older. It hasn't made a bit of a difference. Not one bit.
Anonymous wrote:
Yes, and except for summer bday boys and others with developmental issues, it is rare.