Anonymous wrote:I'll bite and try my hand at reading the tea leaves. All of the above will get in except 3, 8, and 10. My sense is that a weak VCI combined with a low GBRS is a deadly combination. They figure that kid (even with great perceptual skills) can be adequately served by pull-outs in Level III.

What is a good VCI? Here are my child's scores:

VCI-128
PRI-131
WMI-113
PSI-123

FSIQ-132
GAI-135

GBRS-9

13:17 I think you're in.

Respectfully disagree regarding 3 and 13. Look at their respective GBRS scores.

Anonymous wrote:I'll bite and try my hand at reading the tea leaves. All of the above will get in except 3, 8, and 10. My sense is that a weak VCI combined with a low GBRS is a deadly combination. They figure that kid (even with great perceptual skills) can be adequately served by pull-outs in Level III.

What do u think of VCI 126, PRI 145, WMI 132, PSI 138. FSIQ 145. GBRS 8.

Some of the technical reports indicate that the VCI (and to a lesser extent PRI) standing alone can justify gifted placement (without reference to FSIQ) if either marker is 130 or higher. The wild card in Fairfax is still the GBRS.

Anonymous wrote:I'll bite and try my hand at reading the tea leaves. All of the above will get in except 3, 8, and 10. My sense is that a weak VCI combined with a low GBRS is a deadly combination. They figure that kid (even with great perceptual skills) can be adequately served by pull-outs in Level III.

How about 13? I think 3 has better chance than 13.

Thankyou for compiling the list.
Here is mine.

VCI 126, PRI 145, WMI 132, PSI 138. FSIQ 145. GBRS 8.

10 might be okay (on the cusp).

I'll bite and try my hand at reading the tea leaves. All of the above will get in except 3, 8, and 10. My sense is that a weak VCI combined with a low GBRS is a deadly combination. They figure that kid (even with great perceptual skills) can be adequately served by pull-outs in Level III.

Hi, Here's my info:
VCI 132, PRI 131, FSIQ 131, CogAT 138 Nonverbal, 117 Verbal, Quantitative 120, NNAT 132, GBRS 10, DRA2 38

12:36 here. Forgot to add FSIQ 129.

And here's another (my DC): VCI 130, PRI 131, WMI 116, PSI 106. GBRS 12. Thanks for compiling and let's keep adding the scores to this board. Of course, it's only useful if everyone comes back here and posts their results on appeal after the letters arrive. Cheery and warm thoughts to all who are waiting.

Here are the scores from previous posts who are appealing.

1)VCI 127 PRI 149 FSIQ 142 (GAI 146). GBRS 9
NNAT 99% CogAt 98% Mostly O's on report card

2)VCI 148, PRI 145, FSIQ 151. GBRS 7

3) VCI 120, PRI 141, FSIQ 140(GAI 141). GBRS 8. NNAT 140. Cogat 110

4) VCI 129, PRI 130, WMI 112, PSI 110. GBRS 11

5) VCI 136 PRI 145, FSIQ 146 and GBRS 9

6) VCI 129 and PRI 131, FSIQ 132. GBRS 9

7) VCI 135 PRI 130 GBRS of 9

8) VCI 112, PRI 135, WMI 135, PSI 106, FSIQ 129. GBRS 8

9) FSIQ 125, VCI 126, PRI 112, WMI 126, PSI 115 .GBRS 11

10) FSIQ 126, VCI 132, PRI 115, WMI 123, PSI 112 GBRS 8

11) FSIQ 132 and a GBRS of 9

12) FSIQ 138, GBRS 9, cogat 128 and a NNAT 134

13) VCI 128, PRI 106, WMI 120, PSI 112. GBRS 12

14) PRI 145, VCI 138. GBRS 9

15) VCI 136 PRI 125. GBRS 8

16) FSIQ 146, GBRS 9

17) VCI 138, PRI 123, FSIQ 132

Anonymous wrote:can anyone explain a +145 GAI and VCI, very social and motivated kid, mostly O's on report card, more verbal than a quant kid, getting GBRS 8? realistically what might contribute to the GBRS? not being a quant kid?

We are in the same boat here with high scores, excellent report card, pulled out for AAP for reading and math, goes above and beyond at school with teacher comments as evidence of that, but yet a low GBRS. I was shocked when I got the screening file and so were other adults who work with my child. Her 1st grade teacher was completely shocked by the low GBRS and said that is definitely not the same child as in 1st grade. I think the GBRS should be an average from the K, 1st, and 2nd grade teacher.

This is 11:09 again. Here are the data.

NNAT 99%
CogAt 98%
Mostly O's on report card

GBRS 9

VCI 127
PRI 149
FSIQ 142 (GAI 146)