Anonymous wrote:Not only is she a threat to the Supreme Court, she is a threat to the country.

https://www.politico.com/news/2023/09/10/ginni-thomas-leonard-leo-citizens-united-00108082

Why is she not being charged? Why are the Federalist Society allowed to corrupt our country like this?

It's called the almighty dollar.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:New Supreme Court photo - Clarence isn't looking too happy

Does he ever?

A bitter, surly man with a porn problem married to a far right nut job. Sounds great. Along with Leonard Leo, fascists who are extremely dangerous and would love a theocratic plutocracy, if we're not already there.

Not only is she a threat to the Supreme Court, she is a threat to the country.

https://www.politico.com/news/2023/09/10/ginni-thomas-leonard-leo-citizens-united-00108082

Why is she not being charged? Why are the Federalist Society allowed to corrupt our country like this?

Anonymous wrote:Graceless traitor barf bucket Ginni Thomas still walks free, friends, and her traitor husband still sits on the religious tribunal that was once our highest court.

Not a peep from Republicans. So disgusting.

Graceless traitor barf bucket Ginni Thomas still walks free, friends, and her traitor husband still sits on the religious tribunal that was once our highest court.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Explain what threat you believe Ginni poses to scotus.

Her husband refuses to refuse himself with any case before the court that she is involved with.

More than that - in any advanced democracy (spare me the "we are not a democracy" canard) Clarence Thomas would have already been forced to resign. Transparency would demand it.

If the GOP were a decent party, he would have been long gone.

Actually he wouldn’t ever have been nominated.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Explain what threat you believe Ginni poses to scotus.

Her husband refuses to refuse himself with any case before the court that she is involved with.

More than that - in any advanced democracy (spare me the "we are not a democracy" canard) Clarence Thomas would have already been forced to resign. Transparency would demand it.

Yes. But so his husband. The fact is that Ginni earned millions of dollars during her husband's time on the Court, mostly from highly partisan activities. And, no doubt, she was "overpaid" as a means to influence the Justice. And, since the Justice and Ginni regularly describe themselves as best friends (normally, a good thing), the idea that she did not discuss her partisan activities with the Justice is absurd. Both are corrupt.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Explain what threat you believe Ginni poses to scotus.

Her husband refuses to refuse himself with any case before the court that she is involved with.

That’s because he is a key part of the coup.

Anonymous wrote:

If only someone has to balls!

Anonymous wrote:Explain what threat you believe Ginni poses to scotus.

Her husband refuses to refuse himself with any case before the court that she is involved with.

Anonymous wrote:yes, she is a threat

Sounds like a credible threat. Most people don’t get to say that kind of stuff and get away with it. Kathy Griffin posed with a ketchup covered head and got the whole works for doing so.

yes, she is a threat

This is just embarrassing.