Anonymous wrote:Campomaggi
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think it’s really sad when women are so obsessed with “ABSOLUTELY NO LOGOS.” It’s really okay for your stuff to be from a brand. I promise.
I think you're misusing the word sad here. This whole thread shows why people would not want logos.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What says “I’m too monied to even care.”? I thought maybe an old New Yorker tote😂
If you mean rich and also old, old school coach bags are common.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Cuyana leather tote?
You can’t afford a designer bag (probably the YSL tote) but you aren’t trying to announce that to the world. You want what’s trendy but you don’t want people to think you do. It was between this and the madewell transport tote.
This one's wrong. Could afford a designer bag but aggressively don't want one, just want something simple, well-constructed, and no logos. Sometimes compliment other people's bags by name so they know that you know, but choose not to engage.
Yup when I see all those 30 something year olds hustling to and from work with a loaded up madewell or cuyana tote on their arm I think “wow, those women must feel very passionately about the quality of their handbags and, despite appearances, must actually be very wealthy”
Anonymous wrote:I think it’s really sad when women are so obsessed with “ABSOLUTELY NO LOGOS.” It’s really okay for your stuff to be from a brand. I promise.
Anonymous wrote:I think it’s really sad when women are so obsessed with “ABSOLUTELY NO LOGOS.” It’s really okay for your stuff to be from a brand. I promise.
Anonymous wrote:Kate Spade: The poor woman's Prada.
Anonymous wrote:What says “I’m too monied to even care.”? I thought maybe an old New Yorker tote😂
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I prefer old school Kate Spade and now like Frances Valentine. I love Spartina totes for beach bags/summer vacations.
Then you must really love Nordstrom rack.