Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:A lot of rentals. Low condo fees.
I wouldn't say "a lot of rentals" is a red flag at all. Low condo fees I agree with.
I wouldn’t say that’s a sure thing. My building charges mid-range condo fees and is a hot mess. We don’t get anything for them.
What do you expect to get?
Managing agent, electricity, heat common areas, cpa, lawyers fees, insurance and building maint and any snow/grass outside plus a little in reserve each month it is nearly all gone.
Plus my condo we discussed storage area, benches, small gym, garden area but each time only few want to use so we have zero amenities in building. Then the older buildings things pop up.
Then if you have a large lobby, elevators, laundry room, garages and large flat roof and building liable outside windows and doors or outside pools ouch
I expect a functioning staff, not managers who steal from the condo association and who the management company refuses to fire. A competent board, not people who've embedded themselves into the power structure 40+ years ago and refuse to leave, who get kickbacks from forced building projects and who reject any opposition votes/concerns. Our voting process makes N. Korea look like a beacon of democracy. People who do attempt to change the power structure are bullied out of the building entirely. We have an unqualified, racist and xenophobic guy who's not qualified to do maintenance, so he refuses to do anything. We have contractors who refuse to work with the building because of him, and the building isn't maintained. We have building-wide issues multiple times a week. We had some great equipment in the gym, but that was completely overhauled and replaced with the cheapest, most unworkable crap imaginable. We have staff who don't show up to work and nothing can be done. Our common areas are saunas in the summer, except where the building manager sits. There, the temperature is regulated perfectly.
So I'd expect the opposite of all of the above.
Sounds like you are the other folks like you are letting this happen. Don’t sit there waiting for someone else to join board to fix it or current board to change go gather up the votes and join. I had a worse building. We went door to door, phone calls hunting folks down to get their proxies weeks before meeting. We did it very low key. We got over 50 percent of proxies pre meeting and just voted ourselves in and fired over next three years landscaper, cpa, lawyer, managing agent and replaced all contractors and put in bidding process in everything.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:A lot of rentals. Low condo fees.
I wouldn't say "a lot of rentals" is a red flag at all. Low condo fees I agree with.
I wouldn’t say that’s a sure thing. My building charges mid-range condo fees and is a hot mess. We don’t get anything for them.
What do you expect to get?
Managing agent, electricity, heat common areas, cpa, lawyers fees, insurance and building maint and any snow/grass outside plus a little in reserve each month it is nearly all gone.
Plus my condo we discussed storage area, benches, small gym, garden area but each time only few want to use so we have zero amenities in building. Then the older buildings things pop up.
Then if you have a large lobby, elevators, laundry room, garages and large flat roof and building liable outside windows and doors or outside pools ouch
I expect a functioning staff, not managers who steal from the condo association and who the management company refuses to fire. A competent board, not people who've embedded themselves into the power structure 40+ years ago and refuse to leave, who get kickbacks from forced building projects and who reject any opposition votes/concerns. Our voting process makes N. Korea look like a beacon of democracy. People who do attempt to change the power structure are bullied out of the building entirely. We have an unqualified, racist and xenophobic guy who's not qualified to do maintenance, so he refuses to do anything. We have contractors who refuse to work with the building because of him, and the building isn't maintained. We have building-wide issues multiple times a week. We had some great equipment in the gym, but that was completely overhauled and replaced with the cheapest, most unworkable crap imaginable. We have staff who don't show up to work and nothing can be done. Our common areas are saunas in the summer, except where the building manager sits. There, the temperature is regulated perfectly.
So I'd expect the opposite of all of the above.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:A lot of rentals. Low condo fees.
I wouldn't say "a lot of rentals" is a red flag at all. Low condo fees I agree with.
I wouldn’t say that’s a sure thing. My building charges mid-range condo fees and is a hot mess. We don’t get anything for them.
What do you expect to get?
Managing agent, electricity, heat common areas, cpa, lawyers fees, insurance and building maint and any snow/grass outside plus a little in reserve each month it is nearly all gone.
Plus my condo we discussed storage area, benches, small gym, garden area but each time only few want to use so we have zero amenities in building. Then the older buildings things pop up.
Then if you have a large lobby, elevators, laundry room, garages and large flat roof and building liable outside windows and doors or outside pools ouch
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:A lot of rentals. Low condo fees.
I wouldn't say "a lot of rentals" is a red flag at all. Low condo fees I agree with.
I wouldn’t say that’s a sure thing. My building charges mid-range condo fees and is a hot mess. We don’t get anything for them.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:A lot of rentals. Low condo fees.
I wouldn't say "a lot of rentals" is a red flag at all. Low condo fees I agree with.
I wouldn’t say that’s a sure thing. My building charges mid-range condo fees and is a hot mess. We don’t get anything for them.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:A lot of rentals. Low condo fees.
I wouldn't say "a lot of rentals" is a red flag at all. Low condo fees I agree with.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:When we bought our condo (six unit building), I was told that having more than 25% rented could make it more difficult to secure a mortgage. We also received data on how many units were behind in their HOA fees. Ours was self-managed and it took forever for any decisions to be made. Also, challenging personalities stand out more in such a small group.
agreed, I live in 5 units TH, last year we got a manager because of multiple personality clashes especially after it became evident that our treasurer is stealing money by paying to his contractors from the association account, However all the difficult people are still here and the building looks neglected... It is ironic that the owners who were against some TLC are now cannot sell their unit for almost 9 months
Anonymous wrote:An easy way to spot dysfunction is ask for a few months of board meeting minutes. A functioning board spends its time discussing and approving capital projects; a dysfunctional board wastes time on meaningless garbage like policing people on minor inconsequential stuff.
Anonymous wrote:The actually rule for a condo to get a conforming loan is at least half of the units must be owner-occupied.
However, Fannie and Freddie will allow in certain cases confirming mortgages to a primary home owner in a building with over 50 percent rentals as that is how you get more primary owners.
This 15 to 25 percent limit in rentals is a total made up thing.
Now add in an extremely large amount of Condos are not conforming on purpose it is meaningless.
Many many condos including my own are not conforming on purpose aa tons of paperwork requirements and often brings i. Riskier people. Meaning low downpayment mortgages more likely to default.
Some buildings allow zero rentals and don’t have conforming mortgages.
Anonymous wrote:Every building should conduct reserve studies. These aren't cheap surveys, but essentially an engineering company will assess the state of the building and identify the state of each of the major systems (roof, plumbing, windows, facade, etc.) and outline the reserve requirements for a 30 year window. That's really the most important thing - if the building does not have a sufficiently detailed reserve study (or does not have reserves to cover the expected costs) then I would say the building is poorly managed. Having intentionally low fees is a pretty slimey thing to do, where basically each owner is hoping to pass the issues on to the next owner.
I would say ask for the most recent reserve study, details of the current state of reserves, and inquire about the dates and details of the most recent renovation projects. Additionally, small details like a well maintained garden, clean trash areas, lack of trash/bulk items in the common areas, and a clean lobby can proxy for a board that at least attempts to care a little bit.
That said, 4-6 units is tough, because one or two people can really throw the building either in one direction or the other. With a building that small, I would hope that there is at least one owner that is there 'long-term' or has been there some time and has knowledge of the history and details of the building.