Anonymous
Post 08/05/2021 20:30     Subject: Re:Muriel Bowser violating her own mask mandate on the first day it is in effect

Fitness and gym owners asking Bowser to reconsider mask mandate:

https://mobile.twitter.com/EvanLambertTV/status/1423385277834448901

Anonymous
Post 08/05/2021 14:26     Subject: Re:Muriel Bowser violating her own mask mandate on the first day it is in effect

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:She partied for her birthday on Friday night (before the order went into effect)

Then she partied at a wedding of hundreds of people last night (Saturday) after the order was in effect

So: hypocrisy in the extreme


Asked and answered. She followed the rules. The rules say you can unmask to eat and drink. She was photographed with her mask off while she was eating a meal at the wedding. I'm wagering you're anti-mask, yourself.


DP. She is on video going maskless while not eating or drinking.
Anonymous
Post 08/05/2021 10:48     Subject: Re:Muriel Bowser violating her own mask mandate on the first day it is in effect

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:She partied for her birthday on Friday night (before the order went into effect)

Then she partied at a wedding of hundreds of people last night (Saturday) after the order was in effect

So: hypocrisy in the extreme


Asked and answered. She followed the rules. The rules say you can unmask to eat and drink. She was photographed with her mask off while she was eating a meal at the wedding. I'm wagering you're anti-mask, yourself.


Wrong. Try again.
Anonymous
Post 08/05/2021 10:48     Subject: Muriel Bowser violating her own mask mandate on the first day it is in effect

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:The government can only so much to protect the citizens from covid. If an individual doesn’t want to get vaccine or wear a mask, there isn’t much can be done. The major didn't think she was in danger to contract or transmit the virus so she did what she did. If there is no fine or jail time, people should move on.


"People" can't move on because the mayor didn't merely do "what she did." She used emergency powers to demand that everyone do something that she herself refuses to do. And she has placed both the enforcement and financial burden for that order not on herself, but on the business owners in the city who must now follow it. Business owners can't risk fines or being shut down, so they must comply, even though there is no scientific evidence that this policy is going to do much and even though they are struggling after a year+ of mandated closures and distancing requirements. You might be able to glibly say it's no big deal, but that's not the case for many DC residents, particularly small business owners. She should stop being such an entitled hypocrite and start talking about the real public health problem in DC: the people in her party who refuse vaccination and put everyone else at risk. (Hint: they are not Trump voters).


The people of DC keep electing “community activists” to the council. These are people who would be literally unemployable but for elected office and influence peddling rackets. They have never owned a business or had to make a payroll. Can we at least give a moderate Republican or actual independent a chance sometime?


Too many takers, not enough makers.
Anonymous
Post 08/05/2021 09:44     Subject: Re:Muriel Bowser violating her own mask mandate on the first day it is in effect

Anonymous wrote:She partied for her birthday on Friday night (before the order went into effect)

Then she partied at a wedding of hundreds of people last night (Saturday) after the order was in effect

So: hypocrisy in the extreme


Asked and answered. She followed the rules. The rules say you can unmask to eat and drink. She was photographed with her mask off while she was eating a meal at the wedding. I'm wagering you're anti-mask, yourself.
Anonymous
Post 08/05/2021 07:52     Subject: Muriel Bowser violating her own mask mandate on the first day it is in effect

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:The government can only so much to protect the citizens from covid. If an individual doesn’t want to get vaccine or wear a mask, there isn’t much can be done. The major didn't think she was in danger to contract or transmit the virus so she did what she did. If there is no fine or jail time, people should move on.


"People" can't move on because the mayor didn't merely do "what she did." She used emergency powers to demand that everyone do something that she herself refuses to do. And she has placed both the enforcement and financial burden for that order not on herself, but on the business owners in the city who must now follow it. Business owners can't risk fines or being shut down, so they must comply, even though there is no scientific evidence that this policy is going to do much and even though they are struggling after a year+ of mandated closures and distancing requirements. You might be able to glibly say it's no big deal, but that's not the case for many DC residents, particularly small business owners. She should stop being such an entitled hypocrite and start talking about the real public health problem in DC: the people in her party who refuse vaccination and put everyone else at risk. (Hint: they are not Trump voters).


The people of DC keep electing “community activists” to the council. These are people who would be literally unemployable but for elected office and influence peddling rackets. They have never owned a business or had to make a payroll. Can we at least give a moderate Republican or actual independent a chance sometime?
Anonymous
Post 08/05/2021 00:09     Subject: Muriel Bowser violating her own mask mandate on the first day it is in effect

Anonymous wrote:The government can only so much to protect the citizens from covid. If an individual doesn’t want to get vaccine or wear a mask, there isn’t much can be done. The major didn't think she was in danger to contract or transmit the virus so she did what she did. If there is no fine or jail time, people should move on.


"People" can't move on because the mayor didn't merely do "what she did." She used emergency powers to demand that everyone do something that she herself refuses to do. And she has placed both the enforcement and financial burden for that order not on herself, but on the business owners in the city who must now follow it. Business owners can't risk fines or being shut down, so they must comply, even though there is no scientific evidence that this policy is going to do much and even though they are struggling after a year+ of mandated closures and distancing requirements. You might be able to glibly say it's no big deal, but that's not the case for many DC residents, particularly small business owners. She should stop being such an entitled hypocrite and start talking about the real public health problem in DC: the people in her party who refuse vaccination and put everyone else at risk. (Hint: they are not Trump voters).
Anonymous
Post 08/04/2021 17:22     Subject: Muriel Bowser violating her own mask mandate on the first day it is in effect

The government can only so much to protect the citizens from covid. If an individual doesn’t want to get vaccine or wear a mask, there isn’t much can be done. The major didn't think she was in danger to contract or transmit the virus so she did what she did. If there is no fine or jail time, people should move on.
Anonymous
Post 08/04/2021 10:34     Subject: Muriel Bowser violating her own mask mandate on the first day it is in effect

The problem that will haunt her is the lack of humility for not admitting she did something she shouldn't have.
Anonymous
Post 08/04/2021 09:25     Subject: Re:Muriel Bowser violating her own mask mandate on the first day it is in effect

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
?????







THIS is the “smoking mask???” She’s at a reception where it’s clear there are drinks on the table. And here’s one lone photo. For all we know, she could’ve just finished taking a sip or was about to. All this biased news source has is one photo. Show me a series of photos at different times or her walking or dancing at this reception without a mask. But just one photo with drinks??? Yeah, no.


I agree. This is just silly. If she had closed indoor dining or large gatherings she'd have been a hypocrite. But not this.
The title is completely misleading.
"Breaking! Bowser sat at a table during dinner!"


If the rule is that one must wear a mask indoors unless one is eating or drinking - she violated that mandate. Her mandate.
Did you see the video from which the picture was taken? She was not eating nor drinking. She was sitting. Indoors. Unmasked.
Anonymous
Post 08/04/2021 08:31     Subject: Re:Muriel Bowser violating her own mask mandate on the first day it is in effect

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
?????







THIS is the “smoking mask???” She’s at a reception where it’s clear there are drinks on the table. And here’s one lone photo. For all we know, she could’ve just finished taking a sip or was about to. All this biased news source has is one photo. Show me a series of photos at different times or her walking or dancing at this reception without a mask. But just one photo with drinks??? Yeah, no.


I agree. This is just silly. If she had closed indoor dining or large gatherings she'd have been a hypocrite. But not this.
The title is completely misleading.
"Breaking! Bowser sat at a table during dinner!"