Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I know a kid who had all 4 years at MIT paid in full by the Gates Foundation. He is a prodigy from a working class house, African American. I am not sure what you are looking for but it was an academic scholarship (not sure if need had any role maybe it did) and MIT is certainly elite.
MIT Is need-blind and meet-full-need, so need was the first factor in determining financial aid.
I’ve posted a number of times on this point, and I want to clarify: this isn’t to suggest that students who get need-based FA don’t earn it or don’t have merit. Quite the opposite: the reason schools choose to be need-blind and meet-full-need is to ensure that high-achieving students without financial resources are able to attend elite schools. The schools are saying that if you are able to get admitted, we’re going to make sure you can attend. This applies to middle-class students, as well; they just don’t get as much aid, as (again) the amount of aid awarded is based on need.
Anonymous wrote:I know a kid who had all 4 years at MIT paid in full by the Gates Foundation. He is a prodigy from a working class house, African American. I am not sure what you are looking for but it was an academic scholarship (not sure if need had any role maybe it did) and MIT is certainly elite.
Anonymous wrote:I'm not talking about Banneker-Key. I mean the biggies, like to Duke, Hamilton, Johns Hopkins, U Chicago, UNC Chapel Hill, etc. as well as the foundations (Stamp?) that offer four-year full rides.
I'll start. I know one kid who got a full ride a few years back to U Chicago. I can't remember the name of the scholarship. He played an instrument at a near-professional level and was studying an unusual language (like Serbo-Croation?) which he'd learned in high school, had lived in the country and did some other community service like starting a food pantry in a poor neighborhood which he stocked by getting donations from his private school friends' parents. Top grades and scores of course from a private school.
I'm curious if any kids who are not so accomplished on paper ever win these awards? Good grades are a given, but does ingenuity or intellectual curiosity or creativity count? Do any geniuses who sit in a corner and solve math problems in their heads ever win? Or kids who create amazing art (or science projects) in their basement studio or on their computer ever win?