Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:She apparently was OK enough with being in the public limelight that she signed enough endorsement deals to make her the highest-paid female athlete. But if engaging with the press is too stressful for her she can find another job, or perhaps just live off her current earnings, and the tour will go on.
Hmm... Thank goodness she has you to tell her what to do.
Maybe this will start a change eventually, but someone has to be first. Though things don't often go well for the first one, like Kaepernick.
Anonymous wrote:Remember when Michael Jordan tried this at the All Star Game? Never. Happened. Again. So she’s fine with the media when they cover her Black Lives Matter stance she made at the US Open last year and used her clelebrity to get out that message. But not to talk to as is required by the WTA? She’s on wrong side of this. If her mental health was so fragile as talking to the press was too much, she shouldn’t have played. She here we are. But she will not be able to opt out of the part of the tournament that generates fan interest and therefore the $$$.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Quite frankly, assuming she hasn’t done anything crazy to deplete her winnings and has a decent financial advisor, she can retire today and live a very comfortable life. I am assuming that those of you who are critical of her actions this week don’t have kids. If my DD took this stance I would be incredibly proud of her.
If you read her posts, she also indicated that she would be available for interviews after the tournament. Why does anyone need more than that?!
You’d be proud your child thought she could pick and choose what part of her work contractual obligations she would do? Interesting.
Anonymous wrote:Quite frankly, assuming she hasn’t done anything crazy to deplete her winnings and has a decent financial advisor, she can retire today and live a very comfortable life. I am assuming that those of you who are critical of her actions this week don’t have kids. If my DD took this stance I would be incredibly proud of her.
If you read her posts, she also indicated that she would be available for interviews after the tournament. Why does anyone need more than that?!
Anonymous wrote:Sounds like a typical Millennial—I feel “uncomfortable“ therefore it must be a mental illness. I should not have to interact with people if I don’t wanna! Even if they are paying me millions of dollars which they get from selling not only my game but who I am. Boo-hoo! The millions I’m making are not enough if I have to talk to people.
Seriously, enough already. People should interact with each other. It’s part of our humanity. Not everyone loves it but get over yourself.
Everyone is a professional victim -- even A-list mollycoddled filthy rich athletes. Oh the stresses of flying on private jets and everyone bathing in praise and luxury.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I really wish she hadn't felt like she should withdraw. There should NOT be a rule that athletes have to speak with press, either before or after competing, in any competition.
Again, this is how the prize money gets determined. It's how much the media & advertisers are willing to pay. We could probably have sports with no interviews, but the prize money will be less. If someone wants to start a tournament with that set-up, they should feel free. Saying there should not be requirements is crazy. All jobs have requirements.
I’m saying this shouldn’t be a requirement of the job.
+1 It should not be a requirement. The press can report on the details of the actual matches. There will also always be extroverts happy to be interviewed. Why force it as a demand on the likely small number of athletes who aren’t up for it? And why push it to the point where spectators and players will now miss the chance to see and experience a truly gifted player — because she’s not also comfortable with the way the press is handled?
Because hearing from the athletes is part of what drives interest in the sport which translates into money for the winner.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
I find it so interesting when people show such hostility toward other people taking care of their mental health, especially when it has no effect on the hostile person. It makes me wonder what they’re so defensive about.
She herself said that the Slams are "intense". To compete at that level not only do you have to be physically tough, but mentally tough. She can't just pick and choose when she wants to interact with the media. Isn't she active on social media? I always wondered why the USTA did not choose to support her through her developmental years. She must not have done well on their mental assessments.
Anonymous wrote:
I find it so interesting when people show such hostility toward other people taking care of their mental health, especially when it has no effect on the hostile person. It makes me wonder what they’re so defensive about.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:She apparently was OK enough with being in the public limelight that she signed enough endorsement deals to make her the highest-paid female athlete. But if engaging with the press is too stressful for her she can find another job, or perhaps just live off her current earnings, and the tour will go on.
Hmm... Thank goodness she has you to tell her what to do.
Maybe this will start a change eventually, but someone has to be first. Though things don't often go well for the first one, like Kaepernick.