Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Most men (high earners in particular) don't care what a woman's job title is, how much she earns, or what she owns. They care that she is attractive and in good physical shape, has a nice, pleasant personality and would make a great mother. Full stop, that's the full list.
That's why professional women are always so confused when the high-status, handsome man they were pursuing goes for the pretty, easy-going barista/daycare worker who loves kids.
This isn't happening. Successful men are more likely to marry successful women. Marriage is becoming a thing for the affluent and elite, people are not crossing socio-economic classes to marry. It's called assortative mating.
Okay, how about the low-paid teacher at an elite private elementary school? She comes from an UMC family and presents well, but she is passionate about kids.
Statistically those women, as a group, marry men with similar incomes. I am sure there are exceptions.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Most men (high earners in particular) don't care what a woman's job title is, how much she earns, or what she owns. They care that she is attractive and in good physical shape, has a nice, pleasant personality and would make a great mother. Full stop, that's the full list.
That's why professional women are always so confused when the high-status, handsome man they were pursuing goes for the pretty, easy-going barista/daycare worker who loves kids.
This is wrong. Well-educated and high earning men marry equally well-educated high-status women. These couples also have lower divorce rates than less well-educated, poorer couples.
This.
You need to read this:
https://www.aei.org/articles/belmont-fishtown/
The author makes the point that way back when -- 60s or 70s -- Doctor married nurse, lawyer married secretary. But now, doctor marries doctor and lawyer marries lawyer.
Point above is also correct. Divorce rate is tiny for those with income over $1 million.
Anonymous wrote:According to my DH a lot of the things women think are attractive on other women are not sexy to men - lots of high fashion, trendy makeup/hair, very thin body shape, more angular/harsh features. He's just one man so take it with a grain of salt but according to him and his friends a sexy woman is athletic with some curves/softness, dresses in clothes that are low maintenance but fitted to show off her body, has natural-looking hair and makeup, and is happy/smiling.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I find high fashion and luxury brands a turn-off. I have plenty of money to buy those things, they just seem so superficial. Also agree with others, I don't care about jobs and titles per se but it can be an interesting topic of conversation..
Most women love fashion and luxury stuff for their own interest or to share with girl friends, I doubt anyone actually buy those to make her more attractive to the opposite sex.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Most men (high earners in particular) don't care what a woman's job title is, how much she earns, or what she owns. They care that she is attractive and in good physical shape, has a nice, pleasant personality and would make a great mother. Full stop, that's the full list.
That's why professional women are always so confused when the high-status, handsome man they were pursuing goes for the pretty, easy-going barista/daycare worker who loves kids.
This is wrong. Well-educated and high earning men marry equally well-educated high-status women. These couples also have lower divorce rates than less well-educated, poorer couples.
Anonymous wrote:Most men (high earners in particular) don't care what a woman's job title is, how much she earns, or what she owns. They care that she is attractive and in good physical shape, has a nice, pleasant personality and would make a great mother. Full stop, that's the full list.
That's why professional women are always so confused when the high-status, handsome man they were pursuing goes for the pretty, easy-going barista/daycare worker who loves kids.
THIS^^^^ is so true! I love a woman with a little belly fat. So soft and cute. I love to kiss it and lay my head on it or just rest my hand on it while we are watching TV.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Flat stomach. Much more interested in great sex.
Absolutely yes on the flat stomach. I'm normal sized (size 6), not real thin, not fat. But I've always been self conscious about my stomach. Because I have a little bit of a belly there. But jesus christ I KNOW in my heart and in my mind that the men I've been with have absolutely love that soft little belly I have. One of them loved to just cup my belly with his hand. Another told me he liked it becuase it was soft and women are "supposed to be soft" ... the obsession with the belly is my own socially constructed issue.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Most men (high earners in particular) don't care what a woman's job title is, how much she earns, or what she owns. They care that she is attractive and in good physical shape, has a nice, pleasant personality and would make a great mother. Full stop, that's the full list.
That's why professional women are always so confused when the high-status, handsome man they were pursuing goes for the pretty, easy-going barista/daycare worker who loves kids.
This isn't happening. Successful men are more likely to marry successful women. Marriage is becoming a thing for the affluent and elite, people are not crossing socio-economic classes to marry. It's called assortative mating.
Agree. The stats back this up, but it is also what I see anecdotally in the DC area.
It's one of the leading factors in income inequality. There will always be outliers, but in general the UMC and UC are closing their ranks not opening them. The chances are lower than ever for a cute high school educated barista from a MC family to hit it out of the park with a high earning educated man.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Most men (high earners in particular) don't care what a woman's job title is, how much she earns, or what she owns. They care that she is attractive and in good physical shape, has a nice, pleasant personality and would make a great mother. Full stop, that's the full list.
That's why professional women are always so confused when the high-status, handsome man they were pursuing goes for the pretty, easy-going barista/daycare worker who loves kids.
This isn't happening. Successful men are more likely to marry successful women. Marriage is becoming a thing for the affluent and elite, people are not crossing socio-economic classes to marry. It's called assortative mating.
Agree. The stats back this up, but it is also what I see anecdotally in the DC area.
Anonymous wrote:I find high fashion and luxury brands a turn-off. I have plenty of money to buy those things, they just seem so superficial. Also agree with others, I don't care about jobs and titles per se but it can be an interesting topic of conversation..
Anonymous wrote:Flat stomach. Much more interested in great sex.