Anonymous wrote:Would work IF DC had a magnet option in every school or a cluster of schools....see MOCO...
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Maybe if this happened resources would be spread more evenly and result in real equity. More diversity would exist racially and economically. Families with greater political influence would advocate and all students would benefit. Children and families within walking distance would build relationships.
Think of the potential!!
Oh OP, I haven't had such a good laugh in quite a while. You made my day. You want to know what would happen? Take a guess what year charter schools and OOB lotteries started becoming widely available:
![]()
NP. I am not sure what you mean by “widely available.” Are you referring to the centralized lottery system, which started in 2014? Or something else? DC has had charter schools since the 1990s.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Maybe if this happened resources would be spread more evenly and result in real equity. More diversity would exist racially and economically. Families with greater political influence would advocate and all students would benefit. Children and families within walking distance would build relationships.
Think of the potential!!
Oh OP, I haven't had such a good laugh in quite a while. You made my day. You want to know what would happen? Take a guess what year charter schools and OOB lotteries started becoming widely available:
![]()
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Without charter schools, one would be able to buy a rowhouse for $250K in Petworth, Brightwood Park, etc.
But nobody would.
Sure they would. People without kids.
Anonymous wrote:Without charter schools, one would be able to buy a rowhouse for $250K in Petworth, Brightwood Park, etc.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Without charter schools, one would be able to buy a rowhouse for $250K in Petworth, Brightwood Park, etc.
But nobody would.
Sure they would. People without kids.
Why do people without kids need a house? I would stay in an apartment.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Without charter schools, one would be able to buy a rowhouse for $250K in Petworth, Brightwood Park, etc.
But nobody would.
Sure they would. People without kids.
Why do people without kids need a house? I would stay in an apartment.
Anonymous wrote:It's amazing that folks with privilege still don't get their privilege follows them. If everyone went to their neighborhood schools, the schools' success would be based on the same factor they are now - socioeconomic status of the kids in it.
I'm also talking about myself as a solidly middle class black mom. We would simply invest our time and money in the school and then all of sudden...this "poor performing" school would be wonderful.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Without charter schools, one would be able to buy a rowhouse for $250K in Petworth, Brightwood Park, etc.
But nobody would.
Sure they would. People without kids.
Anonymous wrote:Can we stop pretending that all gentrification is done by white people and that it’s a black/ white issue? It’s far more a class issue than anyone gives voice to. Most folks with money also don’t send their kids to the low achieving schools in rural poor predominantly white areas. It’s not so much about race (though in we can acknowledge that institutional racism does impact class mobility), but to simply blame DCPS issues on “white parents” not wanting to send their kids to school with “Black kids”, is actually code for middle/ upper middle class college educated parents (of all races) don’t want to send their kids to school with children who come from and continue to live in generational poverty and deal with the issues that brings. And it seems like in this constant conversation on DCUM the presumption is that all brown kids are poor. Which is simply not true.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Without charter schools, one would be able to buy a rowhouse for $250K in Petworth, Brightwood Park, etc.
But nobody would.