Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think the problem PPs are trying to identify is it's passive-aggressive for a school to link antiracism with virtual learning.

Our charter has done this throughout the pandemic---in the same messages gauging interest for IPL through surveys, they've constantly reminded us that any hybrid program means the school can't continue to provide CARES-like classes to kids in need. It's like they're trying to make parents who want ILP feel like garbage about that stance.

I'm a charter school teacher, and I think it's an important reminder for people like yourselves. And good on the school for creating a survey in such a way that it makes you think about how inequitable it is for you to try to put your kids back in classrooms.

omg. the inequity is YOUR fault.

Right? Isn’t it just a little unfair to the African American bus driver that he can’t go back to work because you won’t teach? I get you don’t want to go back to school because it’s super chill at home, but I feel like once people are vaccinated they should go and teach.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think the problem PPs are trying to identify is it's passive-aggressive for a school to link antiracism with virtual learning.

Our charter has done this throughout the pandemic---in the same messages gauging interest for IPL through surveys, they've constantly reminded us that any hybrid program means the school can't continue to provide CARES-like classes to kids in need. It's like they're trying to make parents who want ILP feel like garbage about that stance.

I'm a charter school teacher, and I think it's an important reminder for people like yourselves. And good on the school for creating a survey in such a way that it makes you think about how inequitable it is for you to try to put your kids back in classrooms.

omg. the inequity is YOUR fault.

Right? Isn’t it just a little unfair to the African American bus driver that he can’t go back to work because you won’t teach? I get you don’t want to go back to school because it’s super chill at home, but I feel like once people are vaccinated they should go and teach.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’m ok with my kids going back for IPL but am also ok with ABAR. Is this wrong, Charter School Teacher?

Yes, obviously.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think the problem PPs are trying to identify is it's passive-aggressive for a school to link antiracism with virtual learning.

Our charter has done this throughout the pandemic---in the same messages gauging interest for IPL through surveys, they've constantly reminded us that any hybrid program means the school can't continue to provide CARES-like classes to kids in need. It's like they're trying to make parents who want ILP feel like garbage about that stance.

I'm a charter school teacher, and I think it's an important reminder for people like yourselves. And good on the school for creating a survey in such a way that it makes you think about how inequitable it is for you to try to put your kids back in classrooms.

omg. the inequity is YOUR fault.

Anonymous wrote:I’m ok with my kids going back for IPL but am also ok with ABAR. Is this wrong, Charter School Teacher?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think the problem PPs are trying to identify is it's passive-aggressive for a school to link antiracism with virtual learning.

Our charter has done this throughout the pandemic---in the same messages gauging interest for IPL through surveys, they've constantly reminded us that any hybrid program means the school can't continue to provide CARES-like classes to kids in need. It's like they're trying to make parents who want ILP feel like garbage about that stance.

I'm a charter school teacher, and I think it's an important reminder for people like yourselves. And good on the school for creating a survey in such a way that it makes you think about how inequitable it is for you to try to put your kids back in classrooms.

But you do see how the way the survey is written and is being conducted makes the results useless, yes? Are they going to try some other way to figure out who wants to come back in person and who supports ABAR?

Do they actually care, though?

No I do not care, if it makes parents think twice about putting their kids back in classes. I hope that was the point of the survey. To influence parent opinion rather than get any information from them

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Can the school legitimately prioritize kids for in person learning opportunities whose parents answer this question a certain way?

How paranoid are you?

Very paranoid - this is a really weird question to have on this survey. Also a weird question to force people to answer in a non-anonymous way. I think schools should not be in the business of this social engineering, but I recognize that that is not a PC position to have in DC and am legitimately concerned that the school will hold this against my family - either directly or indirectly.

Wow. That is paranoid!

It’s actually quite intuitive. It’s also not paranoid if you follow current events, read The NY Times (notably the Smith college article), understand the current climate and trajectory of hot button social issues, understand social justice activism, how critical race theory is becoming mainstream and pervasive, how narrowly institutions must straddle all these issues to placate all sides, and how we basically live in a shame based culture, with the ever present threat of being labeled out of touch, or at worst racially insensitive or racist, on social media and having your life and/or career ended in the public eye if you stray into wrongthink territory.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think the problem PPs are trying to identify is it's passive-aggressive for a school to link antiracism with virtual learning.

Our charter has done this throughout the pandemic---in the same messages gauging interest for IPL through surveys, they've constantly reminded us that any hybrid program means the school can't continue to provide CARES-like classes to kids in need. It's like they're trying to make parents who want ILP feel like garbage about that stance.

I'm a charter school teacher, and I think it's an important reminder for people like yourselves. And good on the school for creating a survey in such a way that it makes you think about how inequitable it is for you to try to put your kids back in classrooms.

But you do see how the way the survey is written and is being conducted makes the results useless, yes? Are they going to try some other way to figure out who wants to come back in person and who supports ABAR?

Do they actually care, though?

Psyops for the junior high set. Awesome.

No I do not care, if it makes parents think twice about putting their kids back in classes. I hope that was the point of the survey. To influence parent opinion rather than get any information from them

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think the problem PPs are trying to identify is it's passive-aggressive for a school to link antiracism with virtual learning.

Our charter has done this throughout the pandemic---in the same messages gauging interest for IPL through surveys, they've constantly reminded us that any hybrid program means the school can't continue to provide CARES-like classes to kids in need. It's like they're trying to make parents who want ILP feel like garbage about that stance.

I'm a charter school teacher, and I think it's an important reminder for people like yourselves. And good on the school for creating a survey in such a way that it makes you think about how inequitable it is for you to try to put your kids back in classrooms.

Who is being hurt by kids coming in to school?

Me

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think the problem PPs are trying to identify is it's passive-aggressive for a school to link antiracism with virtual learning.

Our charter has done this throughout the pandemic---in the same messages gauging interest for IPL through surveys, they've constantly reminded us that any hybrid program means the school can't continue to provide CARES-like classes to kids in need. It's like they're trying to make parents who want ILP feel like garbage about that stance.

I'm a charter school teacher, and I think it's an important reminder for people like yourselves. And good on the school for creating a survey in such a way that it makes you think about how inequitable it is for you to try to put your kids back in classrooms.

Who is being hurt by kids coming in to school?

Me

Anonymous wrote:On the off chance your child ever sets foot in a school building again, the curriculum will be woke wokeness woken.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think the problem PPs are trying to identify is it's passive-aggressive for a school to link antiracism with virtual learning.

Our charter has done this throughout the pandemic---in the same messages gauging interest for IPL through surveys, they've constantly reminded us that any hybrid program means the school can't continue to provide CARES-like classes to kids in need. It's like they're trying to make parents who want ILP feel like garbage about that stance.

I'm a charter school teacher, and I think it's an important reminder for people like yourselves. And good on the school for creating a survey in such a way that it makes you think about how inequitable it is for you to try to put your kids back in classrooms.

But you do see how the way the survey is written and is being conducted makes the results useless, yes? Are they going to try some other way to figure out who wants to come back in person and who supports ABAR?

Do they actually care, though?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think the problem PPs are trying to identify is it's passive-aggressive for a school to link antiracism with virtual learning.

Our charter has done this throughout the pandemic---in the same messages gauging interest for IPL through surveys, they've constantly reminded us that any hybrid program means the school can't continue to provide CARES-like classes to kids in need. It's like they're trying to make parents who want ILP feel like garbage about that stance.

I'm a charter school teacher, and I think it's an important reminder for people like yourselves. And good on the school for creating a survey in such a way that it makes you think about how inequitable it is for you to try to put your kids back in classrooms.

Who is being hurt by kids coming in to school?